Longitudinal ctDNA monitoring for post-surgical molecular residual disease in patients with stage I-IIIb melanoma.

G George Ansstas K Karam Khaddour (Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) S Sumedha Sudhaman (Natera, Inc., Austin, TX) K Karen Lin G Griffin Budde (Natera, Inc., Austin, TX) A Andrew Stewart Poklepovic (VCU Massey Comprehensive Cancer Center, Richmond, VA) B Bently Patrick Doonan (Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) M Meghan Mooradian (Massachusetts General Hospital, Marblehead, MA) R Ryan J. Sullivan (Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center Boston Massachusetts USA) V Vincent The-Luc Ma (Division of Hematology, Medical Oncology, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI) J Jeremy Rosiecki (Alaska Oncology And Hematology, LLC, Anchorage, AK) S Steven Y. Liu (Alaska Oncology And Hematology, LLC, Anchorage, AK) R Ronald L. Drengler (Start Center for Cancer Care, San Antonio, TX) D Daniel Blake Flora (St Elizabeth Medical Center, Edgewood, KY) G Georgia Beasley (Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC) K Kristen Elizabeth Rhodin (Department of Surgery, Duke Cancer Center, Duke University,, Durham, NC) J John Robert Hyngstrom (Division of Surgical Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL) E Elise Kornreich Brunsgaard (Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL) M Minetta C. Liu A Alan Tan (From the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (A.B.A., N.S., S.N., L.L., L.C.), the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (J.H.-C.), and the Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville (H.S., E.S.) — all in Maryland; the Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (K.V.B., M.O., C.M., G.P.B.); AdventHealth Cancer Institute and the University of Central Florida, Orlando (G.S.); Dana–Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston (S.B., B.M.); UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (W.Y.K.), and Duke University Medical Center and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham (J.H., S.H.) — both in North Carolina; the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood (R.P.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (M.Y.T., M.J.M., J.E.R.), and Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (G.C.) — both in...)

Abstract

9571 Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as an important biomarker for early recurrence detection and monitoring disease status in patients with cancer, including melanoma. Here, we evaluate the prognostic value and utility of post-operative ctDNA detection in patients with stage I-IIIb melanoma using a clinically validated, personalized, tumor-informed ctDNA assay. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of real-world data of patients with stage I-IIIb melanoma (N=197), including ctDNA results using a personalized, tumor-informed, 16-plex mPCR-NGS assay (Signatera, Natera, Inc.). Adjuvant treatment decision and post-surgical plasma (N=1,718) sample collection during treatment for ctDNA analysis was at the provider’s discretion. ctDNA results were correlated with clinical outcomes. Results: Across 197 patients analyzed for ctDNA, a median of 7 tests (range: 2-44) per patient were performed over a median period of 24.7 months (range: 3.7-74.7).ctDNA-positivity at any postoperative timepoint was significantly associated with shorter relapse-free survival (RFS; hazard ratio [HR]: 15.0, 95% CI: 7.3–31.0, P < 0.0001). This finding was pronounced for patients with distant/regional recurrence (HR: 27.0, 95% CI: 10.0–71.0, P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis confirmed ctDNA-positivity to be the most significant prognostic factor associated with RFS when compared with other clinicopathologic factors such as adjuvant treatment, stage, sex, and mitotic rate (N=163, HR: 10.50, 95% CI: 3.891–28.32 P < 0.001). Finally, we explored the utility of ctDNA-positivity and its impact on clinical decision-making and observed that ctDNA-positivity influenced changes in treatment management in 73.7% (N=28/38) of patients, ranging from imaging escalation to treatment initiation, switch, or escalation. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the prognostic value of post-surgical, personalized ctDNA detection and monitoring of molecular residual disease in stage I-IIIb melanoma and provide information on real-world clinical decision practices based on ctDNA changes.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 9571-9571
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

G

George Ansstas

K

Karam Khaddour

Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

S

Sumedha Sudhaman

Natera, Inc., Austin, TX

K

Karen Lin

G

Griffin Budde

Natera, Inc., Austin, TX

A

Andrew Stewart Poklepovic

VCU Massey Comprehensive Cancer Center, Richmond, VA

B

Bently Patrick Doonan

Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

M

Meghan Mooradian

Massachusetts General Hospital, Marblehead, MA

R

Ryan J. Sullivan

Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center Boston Massachusetts USA

V

Vincent The-Luc Ma

Division of Hematology, Medical Oncology, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI

J

Jeremy Rosiecki

Alaska Oncology And Hematology, LLC, Anchorage, AK

S

Steven Y. Liu

Alaska Oncology And Hematology, LLC, Anchorage, AK

R

Ronald L. Drengler

Start Center for Cancer Care, San Antonio, TX

D

Daniel Blake Flora

St Elizabeth Medical Center, Edgewood, KY

G

Georgia Beasley

Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC

K

Kristen Elizabeth Rhodin

Department of Surgery, Duke Cancer Center, Duke University,, Durham, NC

J

John Robert Hyngstrom

Division of Surgical Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL

E

Elise Kornreich Brunsgaard

Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL

M

Minetta C. Liu

A

Alan Tan

From the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (A.B.A., N.S., S.N., L.L., L.C.), the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (J.H.-C.), and the Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville (H.S., E.S.) — all in Maryland; the Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (K.V.B., M.O., C.M., G.P.B.); AdventHealth Cancer Institute and the University of Central Florida, Orlando (G.S.); Dana–Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston (S.B., B.M.); UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (W.Y.K.), and Duke University Medical Center and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham (J.H., S.H.) — both in North Carolina; the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood (R.P.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (M.Y.T., M.J.M., J.E.R.), and Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (G.C.) — both in...