Long-term treatment continuation of gecacitinib in myelofibrosis patients after ruxolitinib failure
Abstract
Abstract Introduction To evaluate treatment continuation of gecacitinib in myelofibrosis (MF) patients after ruxolitinib failure, we conducted a post-hoc analysis of pooled data from two phase 2 single-arm studies: ZGJAK006 (ruxolitinib-intolerant MF) and ZGJAK017 (ruxolitinib-refractory/relapsed MF). Methods Study designs were previously published. This analysis included 84 patients (ZGJAK006: n=50; ZGJAK017: n=34) with long-term follow-up for treatment continuation. Results Among the 84 patients, the median age was 60 years (range 25–75), with 50 males (59.5%). Disease subtypes included primary MF (n=70), post-polycythemia vera MF (n=7), and post-essential thrombocythemia MF (n=7). Molecular profiling showed JAK2V617F mutations (n=56), CALR mutations (n=20; Type 1: n=10, Type 2: n=7, uncommon: n=3), MPL mutations (n=6), and triple-negative (n=3). Baseline hematologic parameters included a median hemoglobin level of 87 g/L (range 44–149) and median platelet count of 136×10⁹/L (range 48–951). The median time from initial diagnosis was 24.2 months (range 2.7–352.1), with a median prior ruxolitinib treatment duration of 14.1 months (range 1.5–90.5). Seventy-eight patients started gecacitinib at 100 mg BID, 4 at 150 mg QD, and 1 each at 200 mg QD and 100 mg QD. Thirty-nine patients (46.4%) entered a compassionate use program after study completion. As of June 25, 2025, with a median follow-up of 3.8 years, 31 patients (36.9%) remained on gecacitinib. The median treatment duration was 22.4 months (range 0.1–60.3) for the entire cohort; 23.0 months (range 0.1–53.0) for patients starting at 100 mg BID; 23.0 months (range 0.1–60.3) for ruxolitinib-intolerant patients; and 18.3 months (range 3.2-47.0) for ruxolitinib-refractory/relapsed patients. Additionally, regression analysis demonstrated that treatment duration was significantly positively correlated with the percentage reduction in spleen volume from baseline at week 24. ConclusionsGecacitinib demonstrates durable treatment continuation (median >18 months across subgroups) in MF patients after ruxolitinib failure. These long-term data support its viability as a therapeutic option for ruxolitinib-intolerant or refractory/relapsed MF patients.
Article Details
Authors (25)
Yi Zhang
Hu Zhou
Qike Zhang
Qingchi Liu
Sujun Gao
2The First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
Zhijian Xiao
Minghui Duan
3Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
Liangming Ma
23Shanxi Bethune Hospital, The Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
Wei Wang
Huibing Dang
10The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanyang Medical College, Nanyang, China
Guangsheng He
18The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, China
Hongmei Jing
Junmin Li
Haiping Yang
Huanling Zhu
7West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
Chunkang Chang
1Department of Hematology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China
Yuqing Chen
Zhejiang Engineering Laboratory for Green Syntheses and Applications of Fluorine-Containing Specialty Chemicals, Institute of Advanced Fluorine-Containing Materials
Xin Du
State Key Laboratory of Immune Response and Immunotherapy, Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Center for Advanced Interdisciplinary Science and Biomedicine of IHM, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China
Mei Hong
Xin Li
JiShi Wang
Na Xu
Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Biomedical Functional Materials, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, College of Chemistry and Materials Science
Peng Zhao
Shanshan Suo
1The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Department of Hematology, Hangzhou, China
Jie Jin
School of Emergency Management, School of the Environment and Safety Engineering