Long term survival outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic melanoma: Later relapse and long-term outcomes beyond 5 years.
Abstract
9556 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have improved survival outcomes in patients with metastatic melanoma, with a subset achieving durable long term survival outcomes. However, the incidence of late relapse and outcomes among patients who are alive but not progression-free at 5 years remain unknown. Methods: This is a multi-institutional retrospective study of patients with metastatic melanoma treated with either single agent anti-PD1 therapy or a combination of anti-PD1/CTLA-4 who started treatment prior to January 1, 2016. We analyzed the following outcomes: progression free survival at 5 years, late relapses (defined as progression > 5 years after ICI initiation), sites of late relapse, and long-term overall survival. Results: 206 patients with metastatic melanoma were included; 65% (n = 135) were male. Most patients 86% (n = 177) had cutaneous melanoma and 29% (n = 59) had BRAF V600E/K mutations. In this cohort, 56% (n = 115) received a single agent anti-PD1, while the remaining 44% (n = 91) of patients received a combination of Ipilimumab (IPI) plus anti-PD1. The median follow-up from treatment initiation was 9.1 years. At 5 years, 68% (n = 140) of patients were progression-free. Late relapse, occurring > 5 years after ICI treatment initiation, was seen in 6% (n = 12) of patients, at a median of 8.2 years from ICI treatment initiation. Among 12 patients with melanoma relapses, site of relapses was most commonly at nodal metastases (50%), followed by visceral (17%), brain (17%), and bone/spine (17%), soft tissue (8%), and unspecified sites (8%). Overall, 50% of patients had oligo progression, 33% had metastasis at multiple sites, and 17% unspecified. Following late relapse, 83% (n = 10) were rechallenged with ICI; 50% were rechallenged with the same ICI, 17% switched from IPI plus anti-PD1 to single agent anti-PD1, 17% unspecified, and the other 17% were not rechallenged with ICI. The disease control rate was 75% among patients rechallenged with anti-PD1, 100% among those rechallenged with IPI plus anti-PD1, and 100% among patients who switched from IPI plus anti-PD1 to single agent anti-PD1. At last follow-up, 75% (n = 9) of patients with late relapse were alive. Additional analyses, including Kaplan Meier estimates of progression-free and overall survival and incidence of long term sequalae from immune related adverse events will be reported. Conclusions: In this multi-institutional cohort of long-term survivors with metastatic melanoma, late relapse occurred uncommonly. And the outcomes following late relapses were generally favorable, with many patients still experiencing ongoing survival. The findings in our study support continued long-term surveillance beyond 5 years and provide clear expectations in daily clinical practice regarding cure and survivorship following anti-PD1 based therapy in metastatic melanoma
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (12)
Chantal Saberian
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
Eleanor Handel
The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead, NSW, Australia
Shahar Hartman
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Nashville, TN
Natalie McFall
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Nashville, TN
Suthee Rapisuwon
Washington Cancer Institute/Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC
Gregory T. Gallanis
Georgetown University; Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC
Inês Pires da Silva
Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Georgina V. Long
Vincent T. Ma
Division of Hematology, Medical Oncology, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
Matteo S. Carlino
From the Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center (J.D.W.) and the Department of Medicine (J.D.W., M.A.P.), Weill Cornell Medicine, and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (M.A.P.) — both in New York; Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua (V.C.-S.), European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (P.Q.), Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, IRCCS, Meldola (M.G.), University of Siena and the Center for Immuno-Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena (M.M.), and Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples (P.A.A.) — all in Italy; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland (P.R.); Texas Oncology–Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas (C.L.C.); University Hospital Essen, the German Cancer Consortium, the National Center for Tumor Diseases–West, the Research Alliance Ruhr, Research Center One Health, and University Duisburg-Essen — all in Essen, Germany (D.S.); the College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea (J.W.), Brist...
Alexander M. Menzies
Douglas Buckner Johnson
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN