Long-term safety outcomes of pregnancy among young breast cancer survivors: Results from a prospective, multicenter cohort study.

K Kimia Sorouri (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) Y Yue Zheng (State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, College of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University) S Samuel M. Niman (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) K Kate Dibble (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) S Shoshana M. Rosenberg (Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY) G Gregory John Kirkner (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) K Kathryn Jean Ruddy (Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) S Shari I. Gelber (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) R Rulla Tamimi (Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY) J Jeffrey M. Peppercorn (Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA) L Lidia Schapira (Department of Medicine Division of Oncology Stanford University School of Medicine Palo Alto California USA) V Virginia F. Borges (University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO) S Steven E. Come (Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA) E Ellen Warner M Matteo Lambertini E Elizabeth S. Ginsburg (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA) A Ann H. Partridge (Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston)

Abstract

632 Background: Prospective data on the risk of breast cancer (BC) recurrence among young BC survivors who have a subsequent pregnancy are limited. We sought to evaluate the long-term impact of pregnancy and live birth on BC outcomes in the Young Women’s Breast Cancer Study (NCT01468246), a prospective multicenter study of women aged ≤40 years at BC diagnosis. Methods: Women with stage 0-III BC without prior hysterectomy were included. The primary endpoint was breast cancer-free interval (BCFI) between patients with and without a (a) pregnancy and (b) live birth after BC. Secondary endpoints were distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) and overall survival (OS). A time-varying Cox proportional hazards model was performed by estrogen receptor (ER) status, controlling for age at diagnosis, tumor stage, HER2 status, tumor grade, parity at diagnosis, and germline pathogenic variant status. Results: Among 1,016 BC survivors at a median follow-up of 12 (range, 0.5-18.5) years, 198 reported ≥1 pregnancy and 165 reported ≥1 live birth post-diagnosis. Among survivors who reported a post-diagnosis pregnancy, median age at diagnosis was 32 (range, 17-40) years; most had stage I (35%) or II (40%) BC, with 72% hormone receptor (HR)-positive and 25% HER2+; 42% were nulligravid and 60% were nulliparous at diagnosis. Among BC survivors who did not become pregnant post-diagnosis, median age at diagnosis was 37 (range, 21-40) years; most had stage I (35%) or II (43%) BC, with 75% HR-positive and 28% HER2+; 25% were nulligravid and 29% were nulliparous at diagnosis. Among BC survivors with ER-positive tumors (n = 737), pregnancy after BC was not associated with a difference in BCFI (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.60, 95% CI 0.31-1.16, P = 0.130), DRFI (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.35-1.55, P = 0.416), or OS (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.24-1.40, P = 0.227). Similarly, live birth after BC did not impact BCFI (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.45-1.55, P = 0.560), DRFI (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.52-2.06, P = 0.923), or OS (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.34-1.76, P = 0.541). Outcomes among BC survivors with ER-negative tumors (n = 278) were also not affected by post-diagnosis pregnancy (BCFI [HR 1.48, 95% CI 0.70-3.14, P = 0.304], DRFI [HR 1.59, 95% CI 0.68-3.75, P = 0.287], OS [HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.39-2.49, P = 0.975]) or live birth (BCFI [HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.41-2.53, P = 0.974], DRFI [HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.24-2.69, P = 0.722], OS [HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.09-1.69, P = 0.208]). Conclusions: In this multicenter, prospective study with 12 years of median follow-up, pregnancy and live birth after BC did not impact BC events or overall survival, irrespective of ER status. These long-term data from a modern cohort provide reassurance for young BC patients interested in future fertility. Clinical trial information: NCT01468246 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 632-632
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (17)

K

Kimia Sorouri

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Y

Yue Zheng

State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, College of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University

S

Samuel M. Niman

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

K

Kate Dibble

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

S

Shoshana M. Rosenberg

Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY

G

Gregory John Kirkner

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

K

Kathryn Jean Ruddy

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

S

Shari I. Gelber

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

R

Rulla Tamimi

Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY

J

Jeffrey M. Peppercorn

Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

L

Lidia Schapira

Department of Medicine Division of Oncology Stanford University School of Medicine Palo Alto California USA

V

Virginia F. Borges

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO

S

Steven E. Come

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA

E

Ellen Warner

M

Matteo Lambertini

E

Elizabeth S. Ginsburg

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

A

Ann H. Partridge

Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston