Long-term rusfertide treatment in polycythemia vera: Initial results from the phase 2 THRIVE extension study

N Naveen Pemmaraju (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States) A Andrew Kuykendall (Moffitt Cancer Cancer and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, United States) E Ellen Ritchie (2Weill Cornell Medical College, Department of Medicine, New York, United States) J Jason Gotlib (15Division of Hematology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA) J Jeanne Palmer (4Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, United States) A Aaron Gerds (3Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, United States) D David Oubre (7Pontchartrain Cancer Center, Covington, United States) P Prof. Uttam Kumar Nath (14Department of Medical Oncology/Haematology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India) G Gregory Vosganian (9Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc., Newark, United States) S Suneel Gupta P Pedro Oyuela (9Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc., Newark, United States) S Sarita Khanna (9Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc., Newark, United States) A Arturo Molina (9Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc., Newark, United States) M Marina Kremyanskaya (Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, The Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY)

Abstract

Abstract Background: Polycythemia vera (PV) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by red blood cell overproduction. In the phase 2 REVIVE study (NCT04057040), rusfertide was superior to placebo in achieving hematocrit (Hct) levels <45% and reducing or eliminating the need for therapeutic phlebotomy (PHL) in patients (pts) with PV who were PHL dependent prior to study entry (Kremyanskaya M, et al. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(8):723-35). During the open-label extension portion of REVIVE (Part 3), combining rusfertide and PHL with or without cytoreductive therapy (CRT) controlled erythrocytosis, provided long-term control of Hct, and was associated with a greater than 8-fold reduction in the estimated annual PHL rate (Gerds AT, et al. Blood. 2024;144(Suppl. 1):4559). Pts who participated in REVIVE Part 3 were eligible to transition to the open-label phase 2 THRIVE extension study (NCT06033586) and receive up to 2 additional years of rusfertide treatment. Our objective is to present initial results describing the long-term durability of response and safety profile of rusfertide in pts with PV who participated in REVIVE and transitioned to THRIVE. Methods Pts with PV who participated in REVIVE, completed ≥12 months of rusfertide therapy, and had an end-of-treatment visit were eligible to transition to THRIVE. Pts who enrolled in THRIVE continued to receive subcutaneous rusfertide once weekly with or without CRT. Median Hct and the number of PHLs each pt received were assessed in all pts who received ≥1 dose of rusfertide and had ≥1 efficacy assessment on study. Safety data were also collected, including treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), non-PV malignancies, and thromboembolic events (TEs). New-onset AEs (ie, AEs that were reported in THRIVE but not REVIVE) were also recorded. Results: Forty-six/58 pts (79%) who enrolled in Part 3 of REVIVE transitioned to THRIVE. At the data cutoff date (27 May 2025), 44 of the 46 pts (96%) who enrolled in THRIVE remained on study. Median (range) age was 58 (27-77), and the majority were male (74%). More than half (57%) had high-risk PV; 54% of pts were on concurrent CRT. Median (range) treatment duration in THRIVE was 48 (22-66) weeks; median (range) treatment duration in REVIVE and THRIVE combined was 198 (154-267) weeks, or 3.8 (3.0-5.1) years. At baseline, mean (standard deviation [SD]) Hct was 42.3% (3.7) in THRIVE. At Week 60, mean (SD) Hct was 43.0% (4.2). In addition, mean hemoglobin and erythrocyte levels remained stable throughout THRIVE. Prior to study entry in REVIVE, the mean (SD) annualized PHL rate (ie, PHL/year) for the 46 pts who eventually rolled over to THRIVE was 9.2 (5.2) PHL/year. The mean (SD) annualized PHL rate during REVIVE Part 3 and THRIVE was 0.6 (0.8) and 0.7 (1.1) PHL/year, respectively. Overall, the most common AEs in the pts who participated in REVIVE and THRIVE were Grade 1-2 injection site reactions (87%), fatigue (59%), COVID-19 (50%), pruritus (44%), arthralgia (39%), dizziness (35%), anemia (30%), paresthesia (28%), headache (26%), abdominal pain and nausea (24% each), and diarrhea, dyspnea, and upper respiratory tract infection (22% each). In THRIVE, the most common new-onset AEs were anemia (20%) and fatigue (15%). Twelve pts (26%) had a prior history of non-PV cancer. Six pts (13%) had a new-onset cancer event, including basal cell carcinoma (n=3; 7%), squamous cell carcinoma (n=2, 4%), non-invasive bladder cancer (n=1, 2%), and multiple myeloma (n=1; 2%). Of these 6 pts, 5 (83%) had a prior history of non-PV cancer. Nine pts (20%) had a history of TEs prior to enrolling in REVIVE. One patient with cardiovascular risk factors and a TE prior to enrollment in REVIVE had a new-onset TE of cerebrovascular accident in THRIVE. Overall, there were no TEs in pts with low-risk PV in either REVIVE or THRIVE. Conclusions: After transitioning to THRIVE, continued treatment with rusfertide with or without CRT demonstrated consistent, long-term Hct control with reduced therapeutic PHLs compared to baseline. With a median of 3.8 years of treatment, rusfertide's safety profile was consistent with prior observations. Support Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 3810-3810
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (14)

N

Naveen Pemmaraju

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States

A

Andrew Kuykendall

Moffitt Cancer Cancer and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, United States

E

Ellen Ritchie

2Weill Cornell Medical College, Department of Medicine, New York, United States

J

Jason Gotlib

15Division of Hematology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA

J

Jeanne Palmer

4Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, United States

A

Aaron Gerds

3Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, United States

D

David Oubre

7Pontchartrain Cancer Center, Covington, United States

P

Prof. Uttam Kumar Nath

14Department of Medical Oncology/Haematology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India

G

Gregory Vosganian

9Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc., Newark, United States

S

Suneel Gupta

P

Pedro Oyuela

9Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc., Newark, United States

S

Sarita Khanna

9Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc., Newark, United States

A

Arturo Molina

9Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc., Newark, United States

M

Marina Kremyanskaya

Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, The Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY