Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for far-advanced gastric cancer after preoperative chemotherapy.

L Long Vo Duy (Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, Viet Nam) Q Quang Thong Dang (Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, Viet Nam) D Dat Quang Tran (Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, Viet Nam) V Viet Hai Nguyen (Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, Viet Nam) D Doan Thuy Duy Nguyen (University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, Viet Nam) D Duy Phuoc Tran (School of Life Science and Technology) N Nguyen Hoang Bac (University Medical Center at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam) N Nguyen Vu Tuan Anh (University Medical Center at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam)

Abstract

e16072 Background: Evidence supporting the implementation of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for far-advanced gastric cancer (GC) including T4b, bulky lymph nodes and limited metastasis after preoperative chemotherapy remains inadequate. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy (OG) in patients with far-advanced GC after preoperative chemotherapy. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from patients with far-advanced GC who underwent either LG or OG and lymphadenectomy after preoperative chemotherapy between January 2018 and June 2024 at the Gastro-intestinal Surgical Department of the University Medical Center, a tertiary hospital in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Surgical outcomes, postoperative complications, and long-term oncologic outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and progession-free survival (PFS) were compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 70 patients were included in the study, of whom 33 patients underwent LG and other 65 patients underwent OG. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of operating time, blood loss, the length of proximal and distal resected margin, the number of retrieved lymph nodes, curability, and overall and major postoperative complications. Most postoperative complications were classified as minor according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Time to the first flatus, time to tolerance of oral intake, and the length of postoperative hospital stay were also similar between groups. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were comparable between the two groups (51% and 32% vs. 42% and 32% in the LG and OG groups, respectively). The 3- and 5-year PFS rates were also equivalent between the two groups (41% and 38% vs. 41% and 38%, respectively). Conclusions: LG demonstrated comparable long-term oncologic outcomes to OG in patients with far-advanced GC after preoperative chemotherapy. LG may be considered a safe, effective alternative for selected patients.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (8)

L

Long Vo Duy

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, Viet Nam

Q

Quang Thong Dang

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, Viet Nam

D

Dat Quang Tran

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, Viet Nam

V

Viet Hai Nguyen

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, Viet Nam

D

Doan Thuy Duy Nguyen

University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, Viet Nam

D

Duy Phuoc Tran

School of Life Science and Technology

N

Nguyen Hoang Bac

University Medical Center at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam

N

Nguyen Vu Tuan Anh

University Medical Center at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam