Long term follow up of the response adapted FOLL12 trial for patients with advanced stage follicular lymphoma: A study by the fondazione italiana linfomi (FIL).

M Maria Elena Nizzoli (1Azienda USL IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy) A Antonella Anastasia (6ASST Spedali Civili, Department of Hematology, Brescia, Italy) C Carola Boccomini (Azienda Ospedaliero–Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy) J Jacopo Olivieri (9Azienda Ospedaliera di Udine, Udine, Italy) I Ilaria Del Giudice (Sapienza University of Rome, Rome) S Simone Ferrero (University of Turin, Turin, Italy) P Paolo Corradini (8Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS, Haematology, Milan, Italy) G Gianluca Gaidano (13Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy) A Antonello Pinto (15Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS-Fondazione “G. Pascale”, Naples, Italy) B Benedetta Puccini (10Department of Haematology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy) M Marta Coscia (15Division of Hematology, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi ASST Sette Laghi, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy) M Marco Ladetto (1University of Eastern Piedmont, Department of Translational Medicine, Novara, Italy) C Caterina Cecilia Stelitano (16Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy) F Francesca Ricci S Silvia Anna Maria Bolis (15Hematology, IRCCS San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy) A Alessia Bari (16Smechimai department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy) A Annarita Conconi (10Azienda sanitaria locale, Ematologia, Ospedale degli Infermi, Biella, Italy) A Annalisa Arcari (11Hematology Unit, Ospedale Guglielmo da Saliceto, Piacenza, Italy) G Gerardo Musuraca (7IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori“, Hematology Unit, Meldola, Italy) A Annalisa Chiarenza (20Ospedale Ferrarotto, A.O.U. Policlinico-OVE, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy) D Dondi Alessandra (21Fondazione Italiana Linfomi, Modena, Italy) V Vittoria Tarantino (22Villa Sofia, Ospedale Cervello, Palermo, Italy) G Guido Gini (23Hematology, Ospedai riunint delle Marche, Ancona, Italy) F Filippo Ballerini (24Hematology, San Martino Hospital, GEnova, Italy) S Sabrina Zoli (25Hematology, Ospedale degli infermi di Rimini, RImini, Italy) S Sara Galimberti (14Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy) L Luigi Marcheselli (Fondazione Italiana Linfomi Onlus, Modena, Italy) L Luca Arcaini (Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy) S Stefano Luminari (Azienda Unita Sanitaria Locale IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy)

Abstract

Abstract Background. The FOLL12 study demonstrated that in High tumor burden patients with Follicular lymphoma (FL) treated with immunochemotherapy (ICT), standard rituximab maintenance (RM) was associated with improved Progression Free Survival (PFS) compared with a response-adapted post-induction approachbased on metabolic response and molecular assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD). We here present updated results of study endpoints after a median follow up of 7.9 years. Methods. The FOLL12 study enrolled adult patients with gr1-3a FL, advanced stage and high tumor burden. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive ICT with either R-CHOP or R-Bendamustine followed by standard RM or a response-adapted post-induction approachbased on metabolic response and molecular assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD).End of Induction (EOI) metabolic response was centrally defined applying the 5-point Deauville scale (DS) that defined Complete metabolic response (CMR) in case of DS 1-3. MRD was defined according to nested PCR assessment of IGH::BCL2 rearrangement on bone marrow and peripheral blood and was evaluated only for patients with a molecular marker (MM) at baseline assessment. Post induction therapy in the experimental arm consisted of: CMR and MRD- patients, observation; CMR and MRD+ (EOI or Follow up) 4 weekly rituximab until MRD- for up to 3 courses; no CMR, one dose of ibritumomab tiuxetan followed by standard RM. The primary study endpoint was Progression Free Survival (PFS). Results. A total of 807 patients were randomized and 786 were eligible for this updated analysis. After a median follow-up of 7.9 years (range 0.1 to 12.3 years), median PFS was not achieved and 5 and 10-year PFS rates were 67% (95%IC 63-70%) and 54% (49-58). Also with this updated follow up the standard RM arm was associated with improved PFS rates vs the response adapted arm (Exp. vs STD HR 1.54, 95%CI 1.23-1.93). After first progression 270 patients received a second line therapy mainly represented by an alternative ICT combination. PFS and OS rates after first relapse were 41% and 78% at 5 years respectively without difference comparing the main therapeutic options. Overall, after the induction 85 second malignancies were reported, including 37 hematologic malignancies and 48 solid cancers out of 744 patients. The cumulative risk of 2nd malignancy at 5 year was 13.2%, with a trend for higher risk for patients treated with RB vs R-CHOP (HR adjusted for age, sex, FLIPI2, study arm 1.48 (CI95% 0.96– 2.28). The 5-year cumulative risk of tFL from start of induction was 4.2%. with significant higher risk associated with the use of RB vs R-CHOP (HR adjusted for age, sex, FLIPI2 and Arm 2.26, CI95% 1.10 – 4.63). Overall 15 late infections were reported starting from the end of induction therapy, corresponding to a rate of 1.4% and 2.9% in RCHOP and RB, respectively (logrank p=0.022). Out of 101 deaths, 33 were due to progressive disease, 13 infections, 12 second malignancy 28 for other non lymphoma related causes and 15 for unknown reasons, resulting in 5 and 10-year Overall Survival (OS) rates of 92% (90-94) and 82% (78-86), respectively. Comparing study arms no differences were observed in terms of OS rates (HR 1.20, 95%CI 0.81–1.77). Conclusions. This long term updated analysis of the FOLL12 study demonstrated that high tumor burden FL patients initially treated with ICT are offered excellent outcomes with more than half of the patients who don't relapse after first line therapy and with very high survival rates. Also with the longer follow up standard RM was associated with improved PFS vs the response adapted approach but still no difference in term of OS was observed. While similar excellent results are achieved in terms of long term outcomes the choice of initial ICT may result in different risks in terms of late events mainly represented by second malignancies, tFL and infections.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 1004-1004
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (29)

M

Maria Elena Nizzoli

1Azienda USL IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy

A

Antonella Anastasia

6ASST Spedali Civili, Department of Hematology, Brescia, Italy

C

Carola Boccomini

Azienda Ospedaliero–Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy

J

Jacopo Olivieri

9Azienda Ospedaliera di Udine, Udine, Italy

I

Ilaria Del Giudice

Sapienza University of Rome, Rome

S

Simone Ferrero

University of Turin, Turin, Italy

P

Paolo Corradini

8Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS, Haematology, Milan, Italy

G

Gianluca Gaidano

13Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy

A

Antonello Pinto

15Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS-Fondazione “G. Pascale”, Naples, Italy

B

Benedetta Puccini

10Department of Haematology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

M

Marta Coscia

15Division of Hematology, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi ASST Sette Laghi, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy

M

Marco Ladetto

1University of Eastern Piedmont, Department of Translational Medicine, Novara, Italy

C

Caterina Cecilia Stelitano

16Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy

F

Francesca Ricci

S

Silvia Anna Maria Bolis

15Hematology, IRCCS San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy

A

Alessia Bari

16Smechimai department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy

A

Annarita Conconi

10Azienda sanitaria locale, Ematologia, Ospedale degli Infermi, Biella, Italy

A

Annalisa Arcari

11Hematology Unit, Ospedale Guglielmo da Saliceto, Piacenza, Italy

G

Gerardo Musuraca

7IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori“, Hematology Unit, Meldola, Italy

A

Annalisa Chiarenza

20Ospedale Ferrarotto, A.O.U. Policlinico-OVE, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy

D

Dondi Alessandra

21Fondazione Italiana Linfomi, Modena, Italy

V

Vittoria Tarantino

22Villa Sofia, Ospedale Cervello, Palermo, Italy

G

Guido Gini

23Hematology, Ospedai riunint delle Marche, Ancona, Italy

F

Filippo Ballerini

24Hematology, San Martino Hospital, GEnova, Italy

S

Sabrina Zoli

25Hematology, Ospedale degli infermi di Rimini, RImini, Italy

S

Sara Galimberti

14Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

L

Luigi Marcheselli

Fondazione Italiana Linfomi Onlus, Modena, Italy

L

Luca Arcaini

Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy

S

Stefano Luminari

Azienda Unita Sanitaria Locale IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy