Long-term follow-up demonstrates durable clinical benefits of exagamglogene autotemcel for sickle cell disease with recurrent vaso-occlusive crises: Final results of climb SCD-121
Abstract
Abstract Background: Exagamglogene autotemcel (exa-cel) is a one-time, ex vivo CRISPR/Cas9 gene-edited, autologous cell therapy approved for patients ≥12 years old with severe sickle cell disease (SCD). We report results for durable, long-term efficacy and safety for the completed phase 3 CLIMB SCD-121 and ongoing CLIMB-131 trials. Methods: CLIMB SCD-121 is a 2-year, phase 3 trial of a single-infusion of exa-cel in participants (pts) aged 12-35 years with SCD and a history of ≥2 vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs)/year in the 2 years before screening. The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of pts free of severe VOCs for ≥12 consecutive months (VF12); the key secondary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of pts free from inpatient hospitalization for severe VOCs for ≥12 consecutive months (HF12). Secondary endpoints include VOC-free duration, total hemoglobin (Hb), hemoglobin F (HbF), allelic editing, hemolysis measures, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Following completion of CLIMB SCD-121, pts enroll in the long-term follow-up trial CLIMB-131 for up to 15 years after exa-cel. Data are from April 10, 2025; data will be updated to reflect the final analysis of the completed CLIMB SCD-121 trial. Results:46 pts (12 adolescents, 34 adults [≥18 years]; mean age: 21.4 years, range: 12, 34) with mean 4.2 VOCs/year at baseline received exa-cel. The median number of mobilization/apheresis cycles was 2 (range: 1, 6); 92% of adolescents underwent 1-2 cycles. 42 pts completed 2 years of follow-up in CLIMB SCD-121 and enrolled in the ongoing CLIMB-131 trial. The median follow-up was 41.3 months (range: 8.9, 70.3). After exa-cel infusion, all pts engrafted neutrophils and platelets at a median of 27 days (range: 15, 40) and 35 days (range: 23, 126), respectively. 45 pts were evaluable for the primary and key secondary endpoints in CLIMB SCD-121; 41/45 (91.1%) achieved VF12 (95% CI: 78.8%, 97.5%) and 44/45 (97.8%) achieved HF12 (95% CI: 88.2%, 99.9%). In CLIMB SCD-121 and CLIMB-131 combined, 45/45 (100%) of pts achieved VF12 and HF12 with a mean VOC-free duration of 35.3 months (range: 12.9, 67.7). All evaluable pts had durable increases in mean HbF of ≥40% from Month 6 onward with pancellular distribution (~95% RBCs expressing HbF) resulting in normal or near normal total Hb levels. Allelic editing was stable over time in both bone marrow and peripheral blood cells. Clinically meaningful improvements in hemolysis markers (lactate dehydrogenase, haptoglobin, reticulocyte count, indirect bilirubin) and quality of life (QOL) measures were observed compared to baseline and were maintained over time. Exa-cel safety profile was consistent with myeloablative conditioning and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Efficacy and safety were consistent in adults and adolescents and across genotypes. There was one death which occurred 8.9 months after exa-cel infusion, which was previously reported, from respiratory failure due to COVID-19 infection not related to exa-cel; no malignancies occurred.Conclusion: The completedCLIMB SCD-121 trial demonstrates elimination of VOCs after exa-cel in 91.1% of evaluable pts. 100% of pts achieved VOC free in CLIMB SCD-121 and CLIMB-131 combined, which was maintained long-term for up to 5.6 years. All pts had durable increases in Hb and HbF levels and stable allelic editing; clinically meaningful improvements were also seen in hemolysis markers and QOL measures. These results confirm the potential for exa-cel to provide a one-time functional cure for severe SCD.
Article Details
Authors (24)
Stephan Grupp
1Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Division of Oncology, Philadelphia, United States
Franco Locatelli
IRCCS Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù Rome, Rome
Akshay Sharma
Monica Bhatia
6Pediatric Stem Cell Transplant Program, Morgan Stanley Children’s Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY
Markus Mapara
Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cell Therapy Program, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York
Robert Liem
6Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, United States
Laurence Dedeken
7Hopital Universitaire des Enfants Reine Fabiola, Brussels, Belgium
Lyndsay Molinari
8Sarah Cannon Pediatric Transplant and Cellular Therapy Program at Methodist Children's Hospital, San Antonio, United States
Michael Eckrich
9Atrium Health in Charlotte, Charlotte, United States
Kevin Kuo
1University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
Paul Telfer
Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
Ami Shah
Marina Cavazzana
Selim Corbacioglu
University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
Mariane De Montalembert
Stephan Lobitz
Gemeinschaftsklinikum Mittelrhein, Koblenz, Germany
Damiano Rondelli
University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago
Martin Steinberg
18Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, United States
Mark Walters
4UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, Oakland, United States
Kevin Boerner
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston
Tina Liu
Suzan Imren
20Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Boston, United States
William Hobbs
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston
Haydar Frangoul
Sarah Cannon Research Institute at the Children’s Hospital at TriStar Centennial, Nashville