Local partisan context and mental health
Abstract
We find that, relative to Republicans residing in more Republican neighborhoods, Republicans in neighborhoods with a higher concentration of Democratic residents report higher levels of anxiety, depression, and loneliness. While Democrats in general report worse mental health than Republicans, Democrats show no sensitivity to partisan context. Using a large-scale national survey and fine-grained data on residential political context, we establish that these patterns persist even when examining partisans who live in the same Zip Codes, and while controlling for other individual and geographic features. The correlation is strongest for the most strongly partisan individuals, suggesting that politics is a significant factor in the relationship. For Republicans, the size of the relationship between partisan context and mental health is comparable to or larger than the correlation between mental health reports and other contextual features of residential areas, such as neighborhood poverty or the way racial minorities respond to changes in the racial or ethnic composition of local geography.
Article Details
Journal Info
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
National Academy of Sciences
Authors (5)
Ryan Baxter-King
Department of Political Science, University of Nevada
Jacob R. Brown
Department of Political Science, Boston University
Ryan D. Enos
Department of Government and Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University
Arash Naeim
Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
Lynn Vavreck
Department of Political Science, University of California, Los Angeles