Local Coordination‐Dependent CO <sub>2</sub> Reduction Activity of Bimetallic Cu─Al Catalysts for Selective Ethylene/Ethanol Electrosynthesis

W Weihua Guo X Xingyu Wang (Eastern Institute for Advanced Study, Ningbo Key Laboratory of All-Solid-State Battery, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of All-Solid-State Battery) Y Yangbo Ma (Department of Chemistry) Y Yun Song L Liang Chang H Haoran Wu G Geng Li (Department of Chemistry, State Key Laboratory of Marine Pollution, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, P. R. China) Z Zhihao Li Y Yinger Xin (Department of Chemistry and State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Health) M Mingming He J Jixun Zhang T Tao Yang M Minghui Zhu H Hanchen Shen (Innovative Centre for Flexible Devices (iFLEX), Max Planck−NTU Joint Laboratory for Artificial Senses, School of Materials Science and Engineering) S Shibo Xi X Xue Wang L Lin Gan Q Qiu Jiang C Chuang Xia (School of Materials and Energy University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Chengdu Sichuan 611731 P.R. China) S Shenlong Zhao (National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, No. 11 ZhongGuanCun BeiYiTiao, Beijing 100190, China) Z Zhengxiao Guo (Department of Chemistry) Z Ziyun Wang B Ben Zhong Tang (School of Science and Engineering, Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Aggregate Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), Longgang, Shenzhen 518172, Guangdong, P. R. China) R Ruquan Ye (Department of Chemistry and State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Health)

Abstract

Abstract The formation of bimetallic catalysts has been widely adopted to improve CO 2 reduction selectivity. However, discrepancies in product distribution in the literature, even among catalysts with identical bimetal compositions, suggest the involvement of distinct reaction pathways. Here, we report that ethylene and ethanol selectivity are strongly influenced by the atomic coordination of metals. We prepared two model catalysts, namely interface‐CuAl (dominated by Cu/CuAlO 2 interfaces) and doping‐CuAl (with Al doped into the Cu lattice). Both catalysts demonstrate excellent C 2+ Faradaic efficiency (FE) of 65%–85%. However, interface‐CuAl primarily produces ethylene with an FE of 67.6%, seven‐fold higher than FE ethanol . Conversely, doping‐CuAl favors ethanol production, reaching a maximum FE ethanol of 43.7%, four times higher than FE ethylene . Extended X‐ray absorption fine structure and in situ Fourier transform infrared spectrometry reveal distinct adsorption abilities of Cu and different intermediate coverages. Complementary theoretical calculation further elucidates the critical role of *CHCOH bifurcation. Specifically, favorable C–O cleavage at interface‐CuAl promotes ethylene production, whereas Cu–C scission at doping‐CuAl favors ethanol production. Beyond CO 2 electroreduction, CuAl catalysts also demonstrate phase‐dependent nitrate reduction activity, underscoring the importance of atomic coordination in catalysis. This study provides fundamental insights into the structure‐selectivity relationship of bimetallic catalysts for selective chemical production.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 65, Issue 2
Published January 09, 2026
ISSN 1433-7851
Publisher Wiley

Journal Info

Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Wiley

ISSN: 1433-7851 Physical Sciences

Authors (24)

W

Weihua Guo

X

Xingyu Wang

Eastern Institute for Advanced Study, Ningbo Key Laboratory of All-Solid-State Battery, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of All-Solid-State Battery

Y

Yangbo Ma

Department of Chemistry

Y

Yun Song

L

Liang Chang

H

Haoran Wu

G

Geng Li

Department of Chemistry, State Key Laboratory of Marine Pollution, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, P. R. China

Z

Zhihao Li

Y

Yinger Xin

Department of Chemistry and State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Health

M

Mingming He

J

Jixun Zhang

T

Tao Yang

M

Minghui Zhu

H

Hanchen Shen

Innovative Centre for Flexible Devices (iFLEX), Max Planck−NTU Joint Laboratory for Artificial Senses, School of Materials Science and Engineering

S

Shibo Xi

X

Xue Wang

L

Lin Gan

Q

Qiu Jiang

C

Chuang Xia

School of Materials and Energy University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Chengdu Sichuan 611731 P.R. China

S

Shenlong Zhao

National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, No. 11 ZhongGuanCun BeiYiTiao, Beijing 100190, China

Z

Zhengxiao Guo

Department of Chemistry

Z

Ziyun Wang

B

Ben Zhong Tang

School of Science and Engineering, Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Aggregate Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), Longgang, Shenzhen 518172, Guangdong, P. R. China

R

Ruquan Ye

Department of Chemistry and State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Health