Liver-targeted delivery of bioengineered induced tregs via nanoparticles prevents and treats acute gvhd
Abstract
Abstract Induced regulatory T cell (iTregs) therapy holds promise for graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), but clinical translation has been limited by phenotypic instability and insufficient tissue localization to inflamed organs. Recognizing the liver as both a major site of acute GvHD (aGvHD) pathology and a critical immunologic interface where alloantigen presentation and systemic tolerance are orchestrated, we hypothesized that localizing iTregs to the liver could establish a local immune regulatory hub, enabling sustained immunomodulation and thereby altering the systemic trajectory of aGvHD. To enable tissue-specific targeting, we developed a bioorthogonal click chemistry platform using 4-aminophenyl β-D-galactopyranoside-conjugated, lipid-coated nanoparticles loaded with Ac4ManNAz (ALPA NPs). These NPs are selectively taken up by hepatocytes via the asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR), enabling durable azide tagging through metabolic glycoengineering. iTregs were surface-modified with dibenzocyclooctyne (DBCO) generating DBCO-iTregs that retained full suppressive function in vitro compared to unmodified iTregs. Upon adoptive transfer, DBCO-iTregs covalently linked to azide-expressing hepatocytes, leading to significantly enhanced hepatic localization compared to unmodified iTregs (p < 0.0001). We next evaluated therapeutic efficacy of our approach in both parent→F1 and fully MHC-mismatched murine bone marrow transplantation (BMT) models. B6D2 or BALB/c mice were lethally irradiated and transplanted with B6 donor T cells and marrow. For prevention experiments, ALPA NPs were administered on days -3 and -2 (17.5 mg/kg) followed by iTreg or DBCO-iTreg and conventional T cell infusion on day 0. For treatment approaches, ALPA NPs were given on days 4 and 5 followed by iTreg or DBCO-iTreg infusion on day 7 after bone marrow transplant (BMT). In co-transplantation models, DBCO-iTregs + ALPA NPs significantly reduced clinical GvHD scores, serum AST/ALT levels, and improved survival compared to unmodified iTregs (p < 0.05) or DBCO-iTregs delivered with free Ac4ManNAz (p < 0.01). In treatment models initiated after GvHD onset, liver-targeted DBCO-iTregs conferred durable improvements in survival, weight maintenance, and histologic protection of hepatic and intestinal tissues compared to controls. These effects were dependent on NP-mediated targeting, as DBCO-iTregs or free Ac4ManNAz alone showed no benefit. Mechanistically, flow cytometry revealed that liver-targeted DBCO-iTregs reduced the proportion of IFN-γ+ donor iTregs (CD45.1+) in the liver compared to unmodified iTregs (17.3% ± 3.7 vs. 33.2% ± 3.3, p < 0.01), suggesting enhanced phenotypic stability. Furthermore, conventional donor CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (CD45.2+) in the liver and spleen of recipients treated with DBCO-iTregs had significantly reduced percentage of cells expressing IFN-γ compared with BM + T control recipients (CD4+ liver: 32.1 ± 8.0% vs. 48.5 ± 8.4%, p < 0.05; CD8+ liver: 5.9 ± 1.0% vs. 18.7 ± 3.7%, p < 0.001; spleen: 1.9 ± 0.5% vs. 16.7 ± 8.1%, p < 0.0001), highlighting a broad impact on effector T cell responses. Correspondingly, serum and liver IFN-γ levels were significantly reduced in DBCO-iTreg + ALPA NPs-treated mice. Notably, when co-transplanted, DBCO-iTregs isolated from the liver had greater expression of FoxP3 compared to unmodified iTregs (p < 0.05) suggesting improved in vivo stabilization of FoxP3. Finally, liver-targeting DBCO-iTregs + ALPA NPs preserved graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) activity while preventing aGvHD, suggesting potential for combinatorial efficacy. In summary, our findings demonstrate that liver-specific targeting of iTregs via nanoparticle-based glycoengineering enables potent local immunoregulation, preserves iTreg stability, suppresses effector T cell responses, and improves systemic control of aGvHD without compromising GvL activity. This platform offers a novel and translatable strategy for organ-specific immune modulation in allogeneic transplantation and potentially autoimmunity.
Article Details
Authors (9)
Hyesun Hyun
1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, United States
Sonia Laurie
1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, United States
Danny Bruce
1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, United States
Oleg Kolupaev
1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, United States
Mathew Sebastian
3University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Medicine, Chapel Hill, United States
Mostafa Yazdimamaghani
1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, United States
Jeremy Meier
1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, United States
Andrew Wang
Jonathan Serody
1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, United States