Lineage-specific outcomes and resource utilization associated with antiphospholipid syndrome and thrombotic microangiopathy phenotypes during U.S. cancer hospitalizations: National Inpatient Sample, 2018–2022.
Abstract
e19110 Background: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) phenotypes are rare, high-acuity thrombotic syndromes observed during cancer hospitalizations; whether their inpatient impact differs between hematologic and solid malignancies at a national level remains unclear. Methods: A serial cross-sectional, hospitalization-level analysis was performed using the 2018–2022 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Adult hospitalizations with a principal malignancy were identified (ICD-10-CM C00–C97; D45–D47) and classified as hematologic malignancies versus solid tumors. APS/TMA phenotypes were defined using any-diagnosis ICD-10-CM proxies for APS/TMA (including TTP/HUS) and combined as an APS/TMA phenotype. Because the NIS lacks laboratory and medication data, exposures were analyzed as inpatient phenotypes. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, mechanical ventilation, acute kidney injury requiring dialysis, length of stay (LOS), hospital cost (cost-to-charge ratio–adjusted), and APR-DRG severity. National estimates accounted for NIS discharge weights, hospital clustering, and stratification; outcomes were compared within lineage by APS/TMA phenotype status and across lineages among phenotype-positive admissions. Results: Among an estimated 4,808,274 cancer hospitalizations nationally, 11.8% involved hematologic malignancies and 88.2% solid tumors; the APS/TMA phenotype occurred in 0.48% of admissions. In solid tumors, APS/TMA phenotype admissions had higher mortality (8.74% vs 4.06%), mechanical ventilation (5.37% vs 2.42%), and dialysis-requiring acute kidney injury (1.19% vs 0.39%) versus non-APS/TMA admissions. In hematologic malignancies, APS/TMA phenotype admissions similarly had higher mortality (13.04% vs 6.55%), mechanical ventilation (8.33% vs 3.67%), and dialysis-requiring acute kidney injury (6.85% vs 2.26%). Among APS/TMA phenotype admissions, hematologic malignancies had longer LOS (17.69 vs 9.34 days) and higher costs ($91,950 vs $36,058) than solid tumors. Mean APR-DRG severity was higher in APS/TMA phenotype admissions for hematologic malignancies versus solid tumors (3.48 vs 3.20) and exceeded non-APS/TMA admissions in both lineages (hematologic: 2.94; solid: 2.51). Conclusions: APS/TMA phenotypes identify a rare but high-acuity subgroup of cancer hospitalizations, with greater inpatient severity and resource use in hematologic malignancies than solid tumors. These national estimates highlight lineage-specific differences in ICU-level care, dialysis use, LOS, and cost, supporting heightened surveillance and rapid escalation for phenotype-positive admissions.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (5)
Fiza Farrukh
Sunrise Health GME Consortium, Las Vegas, NV
Tarek Tabbah
Sunrise Health GME Consortium, Las Vegas, NV
Daniel Thomas Jones
HCA Sunrise Health GME Consortium - MountainView Hospital, Las Vegas, NV
Kyaw Zin Thein
3Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Las Vegas, United States
Pinak Shah
From Gagnon Cardiovascular Institute, Morristown Medical Center, Morristown, NJ (P.G.); Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital (A.S., R.T.H., M.B.L.), the Cardiovascular Research Foundation (D.J.C., R.T.H., B.R., M.B.L.), and Weill Cornell Medicine (B.R.), New York, and St. Francis Hospital and Heart Center, Roslyn (D.J.C.) — all in New York; University of Colorado Health, Medical Center of the Rockies, Loveland (J.B.O.); Laval University, Quebec, QC (P.P.), St. Paul’s Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (P.B., J.L.), and McMaster University, Hamilton, ON (T.S.) — all in Canada; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (B.R.L., K.G.); Emory University, Atlanta (V.B.); the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and Stanford Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford (W.F.F.), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto (W.F.F.), California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco (D.V.D.), Cedars–Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (R.R.M.), and Edwards ...