LEEP: A randomised, window of opportunity, neoadjuvant trial examining the pharmacodynamic effects of ribociclib prior to radical prostatectomy for high-risk, localised prostate cancer.

T Tahlia Scheinberg (Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia) J James G Kench (Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia) P Peter Ferguson (2Research Associate, Lawson Health Research Institute., London, Canada) S Sarah Sutherland (Chris O'Brien Lifehouse and University of Sydney, NSW, Camperdown, Australia) M Martin R Stockler (The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia) K Kate Lynette Mahon (Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, Australia) P Phillip Stricker (Department of Urology, St. Vincent’s Hospital; St Vincent’s Prostate Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia) A Anthony M. Joshua (Immunology Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research) H Henry Woo (Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, Australia) R Ruban Thanigasalam (Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, Australia) N Nariman Ahmadi (Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, Australia) G Gavin M. Marx (Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia) I Ian D. Davis (School of Medicine, Monash University) S Shomik Sengupta (Monash University Eastern Health Clinical School, Box Hill, Australia) S Scott Leslie (Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, Australia) M Margaret M Centenera (South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia) L Lisa Butler (South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia) L Lisa Horvath

Abstract

392 Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) remains the second leading cause of cancer death in men. Neoadjuvant pharmacodynamic studies facilitate rational decisions about which therapies should progress to phase 2/3 trials. CDK4/6 inhibitors are effective in breast cancer, but have not demonstrated the same efficacy in metastatic PCa. LEEP assessed the pharmacodynamic effects of ribociclib, a highly selective oral CDK4/6 inhibitor, in hormone-naïve, high-risk, localised PCa. Methods: This open-label, window of opportunity trial randomised participants at 3 Australian sites in a 4:1 ratio to an experimental or control group. Participants in the experimental group were to be treated with ribociclib 400mg daily for 21 days prior to radical prostatectomy (RP). The primary endpoint was a 50% reduction in Ki-67 expression from the pre-treatment biopsy compared to the RP. Immune cell changes in peripheral blood and tissue were also examined. Results: Between November 2018 and October 2022,33 patients were randomised to either ribociclib or control. 17 participants in the ribociclib group and 7 in the control group were evaluable for response (9 not evaluable due to surgical delays (including COVID shutdowns) or insufficient cancer in the biopsy). When examining a random selection of cancer areas, 10/17 (58%) participants had a greater than 50% reduction in Ki-67, compared to only 2/7 (29%) in the control group. When examining hot spot areas of cancer (i.e. areas with the highest proportion of positive cells on low power estimation), only 5/17 (29%) participants had a greater than 50% reduction in Ki-67, compared to 0/7 (0%) in the control group. In peripheral blood, there were reductions in CD1c and CD141 dendritic cells and myeloid derived suppressor cells over 4 times points in the ribociclib (p>0.05, 0.05 and 0.05 respectively) vs. control groups (p=0.46, 0.14 and 0.14). In patients treated with ribociclib, there was no difference in circulating regulatory T cells (p=0.67). Within the PCa tissue, there was a reduction in regulatory T cells in the ribociclib group compared to controls (p=0.07), but no change in adjacent non-cancerous tissue (p=0.701). There was no difference in M1 or M2 macrophages between the ribociclib and control groups (M1: tumour p=0.307, adjacent non-cancer p=0.334; M2: tumour p=0.168, adjacent non-cancer p=0.130). Conclusions: Following neoadjuvant treatment with ribociclib, >50% reductions in Ki-67 were more frequent among those treated with ribociclib than controls. Reductions in Ki-67 were uncommon in more proliferative areas. Changes in the immune environment were consistent with breast cancer studies. We hypothesise that the more proliferative areas of cancer are less responsive to CDK4/6 inhibitors and this may in part explain the lower observed efficacy in mCRPC than metastatic breast cancer. Clinical trial information: ACTRN12618000354280 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 5_suppl
Published February 10, 2025
Pages 392-392
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (18)

T

Tahlia Scheinberg

Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia

J

James G Kench

Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia

P

Peter Ferguson

2Research Associate, Lawson Health Research Institute., London, Canada

S

Sarah Sutherland

Chris O'Brien Lifehouse and University of Sydney, NSW, Camperdown, Australia

M

Martin R Stockler

The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia

K

Kate Lynette Mahon

Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, Australia

P

Phillip Stricker

Department of Urology, St. Vincent’s Hospital; St Vincent’s Prostate Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia

A

Anthony M. Joshua

Immunology Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research

H

Henry Woo

Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, Australia

R

Ruban Thanigasalam

Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, Australia

N

Nariman Ahmadi

Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, Australia

G

Gavin M. Marx

Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia

I

Ian D. Davis

School of Medicine, Monash University

S

Shomik Sengupta

Monash University Eastern Health Clinical School, Box Hill, Australia

S

Scott Leslie

Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, Australia

M

Margaret M Centenera

South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia

L

Lisa Butler

South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia

L

Lisa Horvath