Lanreotide-octreotide switch in advanced gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (giNETs).

C Carolina Ribeiro Victor (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Universidade de São Paulo and Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), São Paulo, Brazil) M Marília Polo Mingueti Silva (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Universidade de São Paulo and Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Sao Paulo, Brazil) C Camila Soares Araujo de Carvalho (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) R Renata Colombo Bonadio (Instituto D’Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), São Paulo, Brazil) C Cassio Murilo Trovo Hidalgo Filho (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) M Maria Cecilia Mathias (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Universidade de São Paulo and Grupo Oncoclinicas, São Paulo, Brazil) L Lucas Stangler (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) R Rafaela Naves (Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino, São Paulo, Brazil) C Camila Motta Venchiarutti Moniz (Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo; Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil) J Jorge Sabbaga (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Universidade de São Paulo and Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), São Paulo, Brazil) P Paulo Marcelo Hoff (Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo and Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino, São Paulo, Brazil)

Abstract

623 Background: Somatostatin analogs (SSA) are the mainstay treatment for advanced giNETs. However, more needs to be understood about the interchangeability and efficacy of commercially available options in sequential use. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of the lanreotide (Lan)—octreotide (Octre) switch in patients with advanced giNETs who experienced no disease progression during octreotide therapy. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients with advanced giNETs treated at a single Brazilian cancer center between 2009 and 2021. We included all patients who received octreotide without disease progression and subsequently switched to lanreotide, due to institutional changes in local guidelines. Endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Among 199 patients with advanced giNETs treated with SSA, 53 transitioned to lanreotide after octreotide and were evaluated. The median age was 54 years (range 21 - 83). The majority had midgut (N=32, 60.4%) or pancreatic (N=16, 30.2%) tumors, with Ki67 index ≤ 2% (N=28, 52.8%) or 3 - 20% (N=20, 37.7%). Carcinoid syndrome was present in 25 patients (47%). Thirty-three patients (62.3%) received octreotide 20 mg before transitioning, while 20 (37.7%) received octreotide 40 mg. The median duration of previous octreotide use before transitioning to lanreotide was 34 months. The ORR and DCR with lanreotide were 10.6% and 89.4%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 34 months, 17 patients experienced progression or death, and the median PFS was not reached. The three-year PFS was 67.2% (95% CI 52.6% - 78.2%). PFS was not affected by previous octreotide dosage (40 mg vs 20 mg: HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.22 - 1.81, P=0.400) or duration (> 36 vs ≤ 36 months: HR 1.44, 95% CI 0.53 - 3.88, P=0.464). With 14 deaths during the follow-up period, the three-year OS was 72.4% (95% CI 57.7% - 82.7%). Conclusions: Our data suggest that switching to lanreotide after octreotide in giNETs without progression maintains the efficacy of SSA, regardless of previous octreotide dosage or duration.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 2_suppl
Published January 10, 2026
Pages 623-623
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (11)

C

Carolina Ribeiro Victor

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Universidade de São Paulo and Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), São Paulo, Brazil

M

Marília Polo Mingueti Silva

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Universidade de São Paulo and Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Sao Paulo, Brazil

C

Camila Soares Araujo de Carvalho

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

R

Renata Colombo Bonadio

Instituto D’Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), São Paulo, Brazil

C

Cassio Murilo Trovo Hidalgo Filho

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

M

Maria Cecilia Mathias

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Universidade de São Paulo and Grupo Oncoclinicas, São Paulo, Brazil

L

Lucas Stangler

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

R

Rafaela Naves

Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino, São Paulo, Brazil

C

Camila Motta Venchiarutti Moniz

Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo; Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil

J

Jorge Sabbaga

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Universidade de São Paulo and Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), São Paulo, Brazil

P

Paulo Marcelo Hoff

Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo and Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino, São Paulo, Brazil