Key Drivers of Activity and Selectivity in Cu‐Based Catalysts for Methanol Synthesis From CO <sub>2</sub> : Insights From Atomically Dispersed Promoters

N Nat Phongprueksathat (Catalysis Engineering Department of Chemical Engineering Delft University of Technology Delft The Netherlands) G Gina Noh (Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences ETH Zürich Zurich Switzerland) S Scott R. Docherty (Columbia University , , , ,) D Damian Vico van Berkel (Catalysis Engineering Department of Chemical Engineering Delft University of Technology Delft The Netherlands) Y Yannik Stiefel (Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences ETH Zürich Zurich Switzerland) C Christophe Copéret A Atsushi Urakawa (Catalysis Engineering Department of Chemical Engineering Delft University of Technology Delft The Netherlands)

Abstract

ABSTRACT The synergistic Cu–metal oxide (Cu–MO x ) interface is critical for selective CO 2 hydrogenation to methanol, yet its mechanistic function, the central, long‐debated feature of industrial Cu/ZnO/Al 2 O 3 , remains ambiguous. Using operando transient DRIFTS‐SSITKA, we elucidate the roles of M + sites (Zn 2+ , Ga 3+ , and In 3+ ) on model Cu─M/SiO 2 catalysts prepared by surface organometallic chemistry (SOMC). X‐ray absorption spectroscopy reveals that these promoters restructure from alloys after reduction to cationic species at the interface under reaction conditions. We find the promoter's electronic effect on formate bond strengths provides quantitative descriptors for both activity and selectivity. All catalysts follow a common formate spillover mechanism, with methoxy hydrogenation/desorption as the rate‐limiting step. The intrinsic CH 3 OH formation rate follows a Sabatier‐type volcano with C─O bond strength, while selectivity correlates linearly with C─H bond strength (a proxy for the formate decomposition barrier). Cu─Ga/SiO 2 shows the fastest spillover, suppressing CO formation and yielding the highest selectivity; Cu─Zn/SiO 2 has optimal binding for the highest activity; In 3+ binds formate too strongly, creating a kinetic trap on the strong‐binding side of the volcano. These findings bring mechanistic clarity to the debated Cu─Zn(O) synergy, showing selectivity is governed by a balance of electronic stabilization and spillover dynamics.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 1, Issue 1
Published August 05, 2026
ISSN 1433-7851
Publisher Wiley

Journal Info

Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Wiley

ISSN: 1433-7851 Physical Sciences

Authors (7)

N

Nat Phongprueksathat

Catalysis Engineering Department of Chemical Engineering Delft University of Technology Delft The Netherlands

G

Gina Noh

Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences ETH Zürich Zurich Switzerland

S

Scott R. Docherty

Columbia University , , , ,

D

Damian Vico van Berkel

Catalysis Engineering Department of Chemical Engineering Delft University of Technology Delft The Netherlands

Y

Yannik Stiefel

Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences ETH Zürich Zurich Switzerland

C

Christophe Copéret

A

Atsushi Urakawa

Catalysis Engineering Department of Chemical Engineering Delft University of Technology Delft The Netherlands