Izalontamab brengitecan (iza-bren) versus chemotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): A multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III study.
Abstract
4008 Background: Chemotherapy plus a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor is the standard first-line treatment for PD-L1 expressing advanced ESCC. However, most patients (pts) inevitably develop resistance to first-line therapy, and second-line chemotherapy shows an ORR of less than 10% and a median OS of less than 6 mo, highlighting the urgent need for novel therapeutics. Iza-bren is a potentially first-in-class ADC consisting of an EGFR-HER3 bispecific antibody conjugated to a potent topoisomerase I inhibitor Ed-04 via a cleavable linker. Iza-bren has shown promising clinical activity in previously treated ESCC pts in phase I study. Here, we present results from a phase III, randomized, open-label, multicenter study conducted in China evaluating the efficacy and safety of iza-bren versus chemotherapy as second line treatment for advanced ESCC. Methods: Pts with recurrent or metastatic ESCC who had progressed after first-line treatment with a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized (1:1) to receive iza-bren (2.5 mg/kg at D1D8 Q3W) or physician’s choice of chemotherapy (irinotecan, paclitaxel, or docetaxel Q3W). Dual primary endpoints were OS and PFS by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) per RECIST v1.1. Results: As of Oct 17, 2025, a total of 497 pts were randomized to iza-bren (n = 249) or chemotherapy (n = 248). Baseline characteristics were balanced between the two groups. At interim analysis, median follow-up for OS was 7.8 mo in the iza-bren group and 7.6 mo in the chemotherapy group. Iza-bren has demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in both OS and PFS by BICR compared with chemotherapy. The median OS was 9.8 mo (95% CI, 7.9 to 11.0) with iza-bren and 7.2 mo (95% CI, 6.2 to 8.2) with chemotherapy (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.83; P = 0.0004). The median PFS by BICR was 4.2 mo (95% CI, 3.6 to 4.5) with iza-bren and 2.0 mo (95% CI, 1.6 to 2.7) with chemotherapy (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.63; P < 0.0001). ORR by BICR was 35.3% for iza-bren and 13.1% for chemotherapy. Grade≥3 TRAEs, which were predominantly hematologic in nature, occurred in 85.1% in the iza-bren group and 60.2% in the chemotherapy group. TRAEs leading to drug discontinuation were 2.0% in the iza-bren group and 3.3% in the chemotherapy group. TRAEs leading to death were 1.2% in the iza-bren group and 1.6% in the chemotherapy group. Conclusions: The study met both dual primary endpoints at prespecified interim analysis. Iza-bren demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in OS and PFS compared with chemotherapy in pts with recurrent or metastatic ESCC who had progressed after first line PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus platinum-based chemotherapy. The safety profile was manageable. The results support iza-bren as a new second-line standard of care for ESCC. Clinical trial information: NCT06304974 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (19)
Zhihao Lu
Key Laboratory of Life‐Organic Analysis of Shandong Province School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Qufu Normal University Qufu 273165 P.R. China
Zhangzhou Huang
Department of Thoracic Medical Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
Xiangjiao Meng
Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
Yun Fan
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
Tao Wu
Qingsong Pang
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
Feng Wang
Yanqiao Zhang
Shegan Gao
Tianshu Liu
Department of Medical Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai
Jin Zhou
Department of Oncology Sichuan Cancer Hospital Chengdu China
Yong Fang
Ning Li
Wei Li
Guochun Cao
Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, China
Sa Xiao
Hai Zhu
Yi Zhu
Lin Shen