Itacitinib for the prevention of IEC therapy–associated CRS: results from the 2-part phase 2 INCB 39110-211 study

M Matthew J. Frigault (3Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA) R Richard T. Maziarz (2Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR) J Jae H. Park A Aleksandr Lazaryan (Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United States) N Nirav N. Shah (Medical College of Wisconsin) J Jakub Svoboda (Institute of Science and Technology Austria) L Lazaros Lekakis (20Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Miami Hospital and Clinics, Miami, United States) R Ran Reshef (13Division of Hematology/Oncology, Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cell Therapy Program, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY) C Christine L. Phillips (9Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH) L Lea Burke (24Incyte Corporation, Wilmington, United States) J Jing Lei (State Key Laboratory of Loess Science, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences) M Michael Pratta (1Incyte Corporation, Wilmington, United States) R Rodica Morariu-Zamfir (12Incyte Biosciences International Sàrl, Morges, Switzerland) J John F. DiPersio (Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis)

Abstract

Abstract Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell (IEC)–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are common complications after IEC therapy for hematologic malignancies. This 2-part phase 2 study (INCB 39110-211) investigated the safety and efficacy of itacitinib, a potent, highly selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor with broad anti-inflammatory activity, for the prevention of CRS and ICANS in patients who received commercial CD19-directed IEC therapy. Patients in part 1 received 200 mg itacitinib once daily 3 days before IEC therapy (axicabtagene ciloleucel [axi-cel], brexucabtagene autoleucel, or tisagenlecleucel) through day 26 with guidelines for use of other CRS/ICANS interventions. In part 2 (double-blind), patients were randomized to receive 200 mg itacitinib twice daily or placebo 3 days before IEC therapy with axi-cel. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with CRS grade ≥2 by day 14 using the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy consensus grading system. Overall, 111 patients were enrolled (63 in part 1; 48 in part 2); 109 patients were analyzed for efficacy and 110 for safety. By day 14, grade ≥2 CRS occurred in fewer patients on 200 mg twice daily itacitinib (17.4%) than on placebo (56.5%; P = .003). The proportion of patients with grade ≥2 ICANS by day 28 was lower than with placebo (8.7% vs 21.7%). Itacitinib was well tolerated, with pyrexia being the most common treatment-emergent adverse event (200 mg itacitinib twice daily, 43.5%; placebo, 50.0%), and itacitinib-related cytopenias were manageable. Itacitinib did not affect IEC therapy efficacy (objective response rate at 6 months, 39.1% [200 mg itacitinib twice daily] vs 26.1% [placebo]). This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04071366.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue 4
Published July 24, 2025
Pages 422-436
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (14)

M

Matthew J. Frigault

3Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

R

Richard T. Maziarz

2Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR

J

Jae H. Park

A

Aleksandr Lazaryan

Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United States

N

Nirav N. Shah

Medical College of Wisconsin

J

Jakub Svoboda

Institute of Science and Technology Austria

L

Lazaros Lekakis

20Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Miami Hospital and Clinics, Miami, United States

R

Ran Reshef

13Division of Hematology/Oncology, Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cell Therapy Program, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY

C

Christine L. Phillips

9Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH

L

Lea Burke

24Incyte Corporation, Wilmington, United States

J

Jing Lei

State Key Laboratory of Loess Science, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences

M

Michael Pratta

1Incyte Corporation, Wilmington, United States

R

Rodica Morariu-Zamfir

12Incyte Biosciences International Sàrl, Morges, Switzerland

J

John F. DiPersio

Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis