Isotopic evidence for volatile loss driven by South Pole-Aitken basin–forming impact

H Heng-Ci Tian C Chi Zhang W Wen-Jun Li D Dingshuai Xue (State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric and Environmental Coevolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) J Jing Wang (Hunan Cancer Hospital Changsha China) W Wei Yang Y Yan-Hong Liu (State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric and Environmental Coevolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) Y Yangting Lin X Xian-Hua Li (State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric and Environmental Coevolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) F Fu-Yuan Wu

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that the lunar farside experienced a magma ocean evolution similar to that of the nearside. Thus, the nearside-farside dichotomy, such as volcanism and crustal thickness, is likely related to the South Pole-Aitken (SPA) basin–forming impact. Although the noritic clasts found in Chang’e-6 (CE6) samples may originate from crustal remelting induced by the SPA impact, how (and whether) the lunar mantle was modified by this event remains unclear. Here, we present the first high-precision iron (Fe) and potassium (K) isotopic measurements of CE6 low-Ti basalts, revealing higher δ 56 Fe (0.13 to 0.21‰) and δ 41 K (0 to 0.09‰) in these basalts compared to their Apollo and Chang’e-5 (CE5) counterparts (δ 56 Fe: 0 to 0.11‰; δ 41 K: −0.29 to −0.04‰). The heavy Fe and K isotopic signatures are unlikely to be derived from cosmogenic effects or the addition of impactor-derived materials. Instead, the heavy Fe isotopes can be explained by partial melting and fractional crystallization processes. For K isotopes, however, the data require that the mantle source beneath the SPA basin had a heavier K isotopic composition than that of the nearside mantle, most likely resulting from evaporation caused by the SPA-forming impact. Our results thus provide robust evidence for significant impact-induced modification of the lunar mantle and demonstrate that large-scale impacts may have played a key role in creating lunar asymmetry.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 123, Issue 3
Published January 20, 2026
ISSN 0027-8424
Publisher National Academy of Sciences

Authors (10)

H

Heng-Ci Tian

C

Chi Zhang

W

Wen-Jun Li

D

Dingshuai Xue

State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric and Environmental Coevolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences

J

Jing Wang

Hunan Cancer Hospital Changsha China

W

Wei Yang

Y

Yan-Hong Liu

State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric and Environmental Coevolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Y

Yangting Lin

X

Xian-Hua Li

State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric and Environmental Coevolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences

F

Fu-Yuan Wu