Isatuximab plus pomalidomide-dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Subgroup analysis by prior anti-CD38 exposure from the phase 3 IRAKLIA trial.
Abstract
7516 Background: With the growing use of anti-CD38 therapies in early multiple myeloma (MM) management, there is a need for data in patients previously exposed to anti-CD38 therapy to guide decision making. In the Phase 3 IRAKLIA trial (NCT05405166), patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) received the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody isatuximab (Isa) subcutaneously (SC) delivered via an innovative on-body injector (OBI) or intravenously (IV), with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Pd). In this post hoc analysis, we examined outcomes in IRAKLIA patients with vs without prior anti-CD38 exposure. Methods: RRMM patients ≥18 years with ≥1 prior line of therapy including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor were randomized to receive Isa SC (n=263) or IV (n=268) weekly in Cycle 1, then every 2 weeks, with Pd. Patients with prior anti-CD38 exposure <9 months (mos) before randomization or intolerance to anti-CD38 were excluded. Refractory patients were defined as those who failed to achieve minimal response on treatment or had progression within 60 days after last dose. Patients receiving Isa SC or IV were pooled. Results: Overall, 67 patients (12.6%) had prior anti-CD38 exposure with a median washout period of 20.2 mos, of which 26 (38.8%) were anti-CD38 refractory. Baseline characteristics were largely consistent between patients with or without prior anti-CD38 exposure; the median follow-up for the overall population was 12 mos. Patients with prior anti-CD38 exposure had an overall response rate (ORR) of 52.2%, 12-mo progression-free survival (PFS) rate of 40.6%, and median PFS of 8.5 mos. In patients without prior exposure, an ORR of 73.5%, 12-mo PFS of 68.8%, and non-estimable (NE) median PFS were reported. Anti-CD38 non-refractory vs refractory patients had an ORR of 48.8% vs 57.7%, 12-mo PFS of 38.9% vs 42.2%, and median PFS of 9.0 vs 7.5 mos. Patients with a longer washout period (>median of 20.2 mos) had an ORR of 63.6%, 12-mo PFS of 61.8% and NE median PFS, whereas patients whose prior anti-CD38 therapy ended more recently (≤median of 20.2 mos) had an ORR of 41.2%, 12-mo PFS of 19.2%, and median PFS of 6.7 mos. The safety profile of Isa + Pd was similar in patients with vs without prior anti-CD38 exposure. Conclusions: Isa + Pd demonstrated clinical benefit across anti-CD38–naïve, anti-CD38–exposed, and anti-CD38–refractory patients. A washout period >median of 20.2 mos resulted in outcomes comparable to those in anti-CD38–naïve patients, and outcomes were consistent between anti-CD38–exposed and anti-CD38–refractory patients after a >9-mo washout period. Efficacy of Isa + Pd in patients with prior anti-CD38 exposure from the IRAKLIA trial presents an opportunity to address an unmet need in a difficult-to-treat patient population. Clinical trial information: NCT05405166 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Albert Oriol Rocafiguera
10Hematology Department, Institut Català d’Oncologia and Institut Josep Carreras, Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Spain
Marek Hus
Raimundo Gazitua
Servicio de Hematologia, Instituto Oncologico Fundacion Arturo Lopez Perez, Santiago, Chile
Aijun Liao
Wojciech Janowski
3Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, Australia
Cindy Lee
12Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
Gabor Mikala
18South Pest Central Hospital, National Institute for Hematology and Infectious Diseases, Budapest, Hungary
Artur Jurczyszyn
17Jagiellonian University Medical College, Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Center, Department of Hematology, Cracow, Poland
Alejandro Berkovits
3Inmunocel, Santiago, Chile
Jin Lu
Center for Biological Physics, Arizona State University
Fredrik Schjesvold
Silvia Ling
Andrew Spencer
Sikander Ailawadhi
17Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
Tondre T. Buck
Spartanburg Medical Center, Center for Hematology/Oncology, Spartanburg, SC
Umer Khan
11Sanofi, Cambridge, United States
Florence Suzan
Sanofi Research & Development, Vitry-Sur-Seine, France
Maya Stefanova-Urena
22Sanofi, Morristown, United States
Vania Hungria
Clinica São Germano, São Paulo
Ivan Špička
9Charles University and General Faculty Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic