Isatuximab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma: dynamics of MRD negativity in the IMROZ study
Abstract
Abstract Quadruplet therapy with Isa-VRd (isatuximab, Velcade [bortezomib], Revlimid [lenalidomide], and dexamethasone) followed by Isa-Rd in the randomized phase 3 IMROZ study provided a significant progression-free survival benefit to transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). In the primary analysis, more Isa-VRd/Isa-Rd–treated patients achieved minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity and MRD-negative complete response (CR) at any time point than patients receiving VRd followed by Rd. Here, we report landmark analysis results of MRD negativity over time and its impact on clinical outcomes in IMROZ. Treatment with Isa-VRd/Isa-Rd led to deeper responses, with higher rates of MRD negativity and MRD-negative CR at the end of induction and during maintenance vs VRd/Rd, up to 60 months of follow-up. Benefit with Isa-VRd/Isa-Rd was observed across key patient subgroups, including older (>70 years) and frail patients. Time to progression (TTP) was significantly prolonged with Isa-VRd/Isa-Rd vs VRd/Rd in patients who converted from MRD negative to MRD positive at any time point. In a landmark analysis of the time of conversion to MRD positivity, TTP in patients who converted from MRD negative at the end of induction to MRD positive also favored Isa-VRd/Isa-Rd. Evaluating MRD status of patients at >1 time point may therefore be useful to support decisions on treatment selection and treatment continuation/discontinuation. Our findings on the degree of MRD negativity and MRD-negative CR benefit achieved during induction and maintenance by patients receiving Isa-VRd/Isa-Rd vs VRd/Rd extend the IMROZ primary analyses and further support Isa-VRd as standard of care for frontline treatment of transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03319667.
Article Details
Authors (21)
Robert Z. Orlowski
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
Meletios A. Dimopoulos
Xavier Leleu
Service Hématologie, Hôpital Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
Thierry Facon
6Department of Hematology, University Hospital and INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche S1277, Lille, France
Tadao Ishida
Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo
Roman Hajek
Ivan Špička
9Charles University and General Faculty Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
Joanna Romejko-Jarosińska
Vladimir Vorobyev
11SP Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow, Russia
Britta Besemer
Department of Internal Medicine II, University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
Sevgi Kalayoğlu Beşışık
13Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
Pawel Robak
14Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź, Poland
Tomas Jelinek
Department of Hemato-oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
Hartmut Goldschmidt
Internal Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, German-Speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group Study Group, Heidelberg University Hospital and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
Thomas Martin
16Department of Hematology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Mohamad Mohty
Sandrine Macé
18R&D, Sanofi, Vitry-sur-Seine, France
Ercem Kodas
18R&D, Sanofi, Vitry-sur-Seine, France
Christina Tekle
19Sanofi, Cambridge, MA
Andrea T. Shafer
19Sanofi, Cambridge, MA
Philippe Moreau