Isatuximab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma: dynamics of MRD negativity in the IMROZ study

R Robert Z. Orlowski (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States) M Meletios A. Dimopoulos X Xavier Leleu (Service Hématologie, Hôpital Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France) T Thierry Facon (6Department of Hematology, University Hospital and INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche S1277, Lille, France) T Tadao Ishida (Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo) R Roman Hajek I Ivan Špička (9Charles University and General Faculty Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic) J Joanna Romejko-Jarosińska V Vladimir Vorobyev (11SP Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow, Russia) B Britta Besemer (Department of Internal Medicine II, University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany) S Sevgi Kalayoğlu Beşışık (13Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey) P Pawel Robak (14Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź, Poland) T Tomas Jelinek (Department of Hemato-oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic) H Hartmut Goldschmidt (Internal Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, German-Speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group Study Group, Heidelberg University Hospital and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany) T Thomas Martin (16Department of Hematology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) M Mohamad Mohty S Sandrine Macé (18R&D, Sanofi, Vitry-sur-Seine, France) E Ercem Kodas (18R&D, Sanofi, Vitry-sur-Seine, France) C Christina Tekle (19Sanofi, Cambridge, MA) A Andrea T. Shafer (19Sanofi, Cambridge, MA) P Philippe Moreau

Abstract

Abstract Quadruplet therapy with Isa-VRd (isatuximab, Velcade [bortezomib], Revlimid [lenalidomide], and dexamethasone) followed by Isa-Rd in the randomized phase 3 IMROZ study provided a significant progression-free survival benefit to transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). In the primary analysis, more Isa-VRd/Isa-Rd–treated patients achieved minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity and MRD-negative complete response (CR) at any time point than patients receiving VRd followed by Rd. Here, we report landmark analysis results of MRD negativity over time and its impact on clinical outcomes in IMROZ. Treatment with Isa-VRd/Isa-Rd led to deeper responses, with higher rates of MRD negativity and MRD-negative CR at the end of induction and during maintenance vs VRd/Rd, up to 60 months of follow-up. Benefit with Isa-VRd/Isa-Rd was observed across key patient subgroups, including older (>70 years) and frail patients. Time to progression (TTP) was significantly prolonged with Isa-VRd/Isa-Rd vs VRd/Rd in patients who converted from MRD negative to MRD positive at any time point. In a landmark analysis of the time of conversion to MRD positivity, TTP in patients who converted from MRD negative at the end of induction to MRD positive also favored Isa-VRd/Isa-Rd. Evaluating MRD status of patients at >1 time point may therefore be useful to support decisions on treatment selection and treatment continuation/discontinuation. Our findings on the degree of MRD negativity and MRD-negative CR benefit achieved during induction and maintenance by patients receiving Isa-VRd/Isa-Rd vs VRd/Rd extend the IMROZ primary analyses and further support Isa-VRd as standard of care for frontline treatment of transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03319667.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 147, Issue 23
Published June 04, 2026
Pages 2760-2769
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (21)

R

Robert Z. Orlowski

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States

M

Meletios A. Dimopoulos

X

Xavier Leleu

Service Hématologie, Hôpital Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France

T

Thierry Facon

6Department of Hematology, University Hospital and INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche S1277, Lille, France

T

Tadao Ishida

Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo

R

Roman Hajek

I

Ivan Špička

9Charles University and General Faculty Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

J

Joanna Romejko-Jarosińska

V

Vladimir Vorobyev

11SP Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow, Russia

B

Britta Besemer

Department of Internal Medicine II, University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

S

Sevgi Kalayoğlu Beşışık

13Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey

P

Pawel Robak

14Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź, Poland

T

Tomas Jelinek

Department of Hemato-oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic

H

Hartmut Goldschmidt

Internal Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, German-Speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group Study Group, Heidelberg University Hospital and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany

T

Thomas Martin

16Department of Hematology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

M

Mohamad Mohty

S

Sandrine Macé

18R&D, Sanofi, Vitry-sur-Seine, France

E

Ercem Kodas

18R&D, Sanofi, Vitry-sur-Seine, France

C

Christina Tekle

19Sanofi, Cambridge, MA

A

Andrea T. Shafer

19Sanofi, Cambridge, MA

P

Philippe Moreau