Is reflux hypersensitivity truly a functional gastrointestinal disorder? A retrospective cross-sectional study

Y Yanping Wu S Siyu Liao T Tianyao Qu J Jiaxuan Zhou F Fei Dai (Interdisciplinary Research Center on Biology and Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences) B Bin Qin (Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy Materials Chemistry of Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry) X Xiaoyu Xu (State Key Laboratory of Systems Medicine for Cancer, School of Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Medical Robotics and Shanghai Academy of Experimental Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University) J Jun Zhang Y Yan Cheng (Key Laboratory of Polar Materials and Devices (MOE), School of Information and Electronic Engineering (School of Integrated Circuits Science and Engineering), East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.)

Abstract

Background According to Rome IV, reflux hypersensitivity (RH) represents a novel form of functional esophageal disorder. This study was designed to compare the clinical features of three types of endoscopic-negative heartburn: RH, nonerosive reflux disease (NERD), and functional heartburn (FH). Methods Patients with heartburn in a medical center from 01/01/2017 to 10/31/2021 were included. This article presented a blinded retrospective analysis of 24 h MII–pH and HRM tracings from patients with NERD, RH, and FH to compare their clinical characteristics. Results A total of 118 patients were included in the study. There were no significant differences in age, sex, BMI, smoking status, or drinking history among RH, NERD and FH. Functional dyspepsia (FD) symptoms were more prone to exist in FH than in NERD (P < 0.05), whereas hiatal hernia was more prevalent in NERD and RH than in FH (P < 0.05). The incidence of anxiety and depression gradually increased in the NERD, RH, and FH groups (P >  0.05). The distal MNBI and PSPW index of the NERD and RH groups were lower than those of the FH group (P < 0.05). The distal MNBI showed good diagnostic potential. Conclusions Clear pathological alterations, which are distinct from those of other FGIDs, are observable in RH. It might be inappropriate to categorize RHs within FGIDs.

Article Details

Journal PLoS ONE
Volume / Issue Vol. 20, Issue 1
Published January 17, 2025
Pages e0316226
ISSN 1932-6203
Publisher Public Library of Science

Journal Info

PLoS ONE

Public Library of Science

ISSN: 1932-6203 Open Access Health Sciences

Authors (9)

Y

Yanping Wu

S

Siyu Liao

T

Tianyao Qu

J

Jiaxuan Zhou

F

Fei Dai

Interdisciplinary Research Center on Biology and Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences

B

Bin Qin

Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy Materials Chemistry of Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry

X

Xiaoyu Xu

State Key Laboratory of Systems Medicine for Cancer, School of Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Medical Robotics and Shanghai Academy of Experimental Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

J

Jun Zhang

Y

Yan Cheng

Key Laboratory of Polar Materials and Devices (MOE), School of Information and Electronic Engineering (School of Integrated Circuits Science and Engineering), East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.