Is initial treatment with dasatinib for newly diagnosed chronic Phase chronic myeloid leukemia, followed by switching to imatinib for those that achieve MR3.0 at 12 months, an effective strategy? Results of the Phase 2 kinase inhibition with sprycel startup study

P Peter Browett (1University of Auckland, Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, Auckland, New Zealand) Z Zhenqiang Wu (2University of Auckland, Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Auckland, New Zealand) H Humphrey Pullon (3Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand, Waikato, Department of Haematology, Hamilton, New Zealand) J Jenny Yoon (4Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand, Te Toka Tumai, Department of Haematology, Auckland, New Zealand) M Melissa Firth (5University of Auckland, Cancer Trials New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand) S Shani Peleg (5University of Auckland, Cancer Trials New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand) E Emma-Jane McDonald (6Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand, Waitaha, Department of Haematology, Christchurch, New Zealand) S Sarah Benge (5University of Auckland, Cancer Trials New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand) B Bart Baker (7Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand, Palmerston North, Department of Haematology, Palmerston North, New Zealand) M Merit Hanna (9North Shore Hospital, Waitemata District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand) V Victoria Campion (9Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand, Capital Coast Health, Department of Haematology, Wellington, New Zealand) S Shahidul Islam G Gordon Royle (10Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand, Counties-Manukau, Department of Haematology, Auckland, New Zealand) N Nicky Lawrence (5University of Auckland, Cancer Trials New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand) K Katrina Sharples L Lucy Pemberton (3Southern Blood and Cancer Service, Dunedin Hospital, Dunedin, New Zealand)

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Frontline treatment of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) with the second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (2G-TKI) results in a more rapid and deeper molecular response than with imatinib (IM), but is associated with an increased risk of significant long term side effects. The aim of the KISS study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of initial therapy with the 2G-TKI dasatinib (DAS), followed by a switch to IM for those that achieved MR3.0 after 12 months of therapy. Methods A multicenter, prospective, open-label, single arm phase II trial of DAS, followed by IM in previously untreated participants (ppts) with CP-CML was conducted. Participants with CP-CML were commenced on DAS 100mg daily. Those achieving Major Molecular Response (MR3.0; BCR: ABL1 ≤0.1%) at 12 months, confirmed on repeat testing at 13 months, were eligible to switch to IM 400mg daily with a further two years of follow up. The primary outcome was maintenance of MR3.0 for 2 years after the switch to IM. Secondary outcomes included: progression free survival (PFS); failure free survival (FFS); overall survival (OS); the proportion of ppts who regain MR3.0 on DAS or other TKI therapy after having a confirmed loss of MR3.0 on IM; time to MR3.0, MR4.0 and MR4.5; adverse events (AEs); and quality of life (QoL). Proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for time to event outcomes were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results Ninety-six ppts were recruited between 17 July 2017 and 14 April 2022 across 9 New Zealand sites. Three ppts were ineligible due to variant transcript or baseline comorbidities and excluded. Baseline characteristics (n= 93) were: median age 53 years (range 19-79), 56% male, ELTS score 67% low, 27% medium and 5% high. Ten ppts (11%) had additional chromosomal abnormalities detected and 36 (39%) had b2a2 transcripts, 49 (53%) b3a2, and for 8 (9%) it was not determined. At 12 months, 79 ppts were assessed for eligibility to switch to IM; 14 ppts had discontinued DAS (ten due to toxicity, two due to ppt choice, one developed blast crisis and one developed glioblastoma). Of the 79 ppts, 56 (71%) achieved confirmed MR3.0, 3 had unconfirmed MR3.0 and 20 had not achieved MR3.0. Fifty of the 56 ppts who had achieved a confirmed MR3.0 consented to switch to IM. During the 2 years after switching to IM, 43 of the 50 (86%, 95% CI=73 to 94) retained MR3.0. Of the 7 who lost MR3.0; 5 regained it (4 switched back to DAS and 1 remained on IM due to prior non-adherence). Of the 2 who did not regain MR3.0, 1 stayed on IM and 1 switched back to DAS and then had disease progression at month 36. On commencing IM, 12/50 (24%) of ppts were in MR4.0 and 25/50 (50%) were in MR4.5. At the end of follow-up (24 months after starting IM) 3/46 (7%) were in MR4.0and36/46 (78%) ppts were in MR4.5. Four ppts withdrew before the last study visit; their last MR level was MR3.0 for 2 ppts and MR4.5for 2 ppts. Among the 50 who switched to IM 1 ppt had disease progression, 7 treatment failure, and 0 died, giving PFS, FFS and OS at 3 years from start of DAS of 98%, (95%CI=89 to 100), 86%, (95%CI=73 to 94) and 100%, (95%CI=93 to100) respectively. For the 50 ppts who switched to IM, 24% reported a severe symptom burden as per QoL score at 12 months (after 12 months of DAS), whilst 8% reported a severe symptom burden at 36 months (after 24 months of IM; missing for 7 ppts). Grade 3 or greater AEs were reported for 26% of these ppts in the first 12 months of DAS, and 36% of ppts throughout the 24 months of IM. For the total cohort (93 ppts) the proportion with Grade 3+ adverse events in the first 12 months of DAS was 39%. Conclusion This clinical trial investigated the efficacy of initial DAS with a planned switch to IM at 12 months for those achieving MR3.0. IM was well tolerated and effective in maintaining a molecular response in ppts that were in MMR after an initial 12 months of DAS therapy. This should be considered as a treatment strategy for inducing a deep and rapid molecular response but avoiding long term toxicity in patients with newly diagnosed CP-CML

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 2006-2006
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (16)

P

Peter Browett

1University of Auckland, Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, Auckland, New Zealand

Z

Zhenqiang Wu

2University of Auckland, Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Auckland, New Zealand

H

Humphrey Pullon

3Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand, Waikato, Department of Haematology, Hamilton, New Zealand

J

Jenny Yoon

4Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand, Te Toka Tumai, Department of Haematology, Auckland, New Zealand

M

Melissa Firth

5University of Auckland, Cancer Trials New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand

S

Shani Peleg

5University of Auckland, Cancer Trials New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand

E

Emma-Jane McDonald

6Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand, Waitaha, Department of Haematology, Christchurch, New Zealand

S

Sarah Benge

5University of Auckland, Cancer Trials New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand

B

Bart Baker

7Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand, Palmerston North, Department of Haematology, Palmerston North, New Zealand

M

Merit Hanna

9North Shore Hospital, Waitemata District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand

V

Victoria Campion

9Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand, Capital Coast Health, Department of Haematology, Wellington, New Zealand

S

Shahidul Islam

G

Gordon Royle

10Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand, Counties-Manukau, Department of Haematology, Auckland, New Zealand

N

Nicky Lawrence

5University of Auckland, Cancer Trials New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand

K

Katrina Sharples

L

Lucy Pemberton

3Southern Blood and Cancer Service, Dunedin Hospital, Dunedin, New Zealand