Iparomlimab and tuvonralimab (PD-1/CTLA-4 bifunctional antibody) monotherapy or combination therapy in patients with advanced solid tumors treated.
Abstract
e23358 Background: Patients with advanced solid tumors that progress after first-line treatment, particularly after PD-(L)1 inhibitor therapy, face limited treatment options. Iparomlimab and Tuvonralimab (QL1706) exert PD-1 inhibition while preserving the ADCC effect of CTLA-4 to deplete Treg cells. the anti-CTLA-4 antibody was engineered to have a shorter elimination half-life (t1/2) to reduce its exposure and lower the risk of irAEs,achieving a balance of enhanced efficacy and reduced toxicity.This multicenter real-world study evaluates the clinical utility of QL1706 in patients with advanced solid tumors, with a particular focus on those receiving 2nd-line and beyond treatments, including in the immunotherapy rechallenge setting. Methods: We enrolled patients with histologically confirmed advanced solid tumors who had received QL1706 (monotherapy or combination) as 2nd-line and beyond treatment across six clinical centers. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR),disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS),and overall survival (OS). Results: As of December 31, 2025, 50 patients were evaluable (NSCLC, 24%; gastric, 16%; HCC, 14%; rectal, 14%; others, 32%). In the overall cohort(n = 50; median age 62.0; 70% male),the ORR was 26.0% (13/50; 95% CI, 13.4–38.6) and DCR was 88.0% (44/50; 95% CI, 78.7–97.3) according to RECIST version 1.1.The median PFS and OS have not yet been reached (with a median follow-up of 6.7 months).Robust disease control was maintained across later lines, with ORR of 42.9% (6/14) and DCR of 92.9% (13/14) in 3rd-line settings.In the immunotherapy rechallenge subgroup (n = 32; median age 65.0), QL1706 demonstrated encouraging activity despite prior PD-(L)1 failure, with an ORR of 18.8% (6/32; 95% CI, 4.0–33.1) and a DCR of 84.4% (27/32; 95% CI, 71.1–97.7). At a median follow-up of 6.3 months, median PFS was 7.5 months (95% CI, 4.1–10.9), median OS was not yet reached.In the overall population,immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occurred in 26% of patients. Notably, Grade 3 irAEs were limited to 5.4% (primarily pneumonitis and elevated AST), showing a more favorable safety profile compared to historical anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 combination therapies. No treatment-related deaths were reported. Conclusions: In this study, QL1706 demonstrated a manageable safety profile and encouraging antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors as 2nd-line and beyond treatment.Notably, QL1706 could be a potential treatment regimen for patients receiving immunotherapy rechallenge after prior PD-(L)1 failure. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2500106339.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (10)
Jie Liu
Lin Wei
Department of Infectious Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
Jie Li
Shuhong Liu
Baozhong Wang
Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaochen, China
Jingang Cheng
QiLu Hospital of Shandong University DeZhou Hospital, Dezhou, China
Yi Xie
Junbao Xu
Shandong Provincial Public Health Clinical Center, Jinan, China
Ronghui Yuan
Shandong Provincial Public Health Clinical Center, Jinan, China
Zhongfa Zhang