Iopofosine I-131 after BTK inhibitors in Waldenström macroglobulinemia: CLOVER-WaM subgroup efficacy and safety.
Abstract
7094 Background: Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM) remains incurable with current available therapeutic options. Treatment options for relapsed/refractory pts are limited and often continuous, underscoring the need for new agents with novel mechanisms of action and pt-centered, fixed duration therapy. Iopofosine I 131 is a novel radiopharmaceutical compound composed of a lipid raft-targeting phospholipid ether covalently bound to 131 I, a beta emitting radioisotope. Here, we report preliminary sub-group results of the CLOVER-WaM study [NCT02952508] in WM pts treated with a Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase inhibitor (BTKi) immediately prior to iopofosine. Methods: Eligible WM pts had received >2 prior therapies and had symptomatic disease requiring therapy according to consensus recommendations for WM. Treatment consisted of 2 cycles of iopofosine I 131 administered at 15 mCi/m 2 on days 1 and 15 of each 57-day cycle. The primary efficacy endpoint was major response rate (MRR; partial response or better, as determined by the modified IWWM-VI). Secondary and exploratory endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), treatment-free survival (TFS), progression free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), and clinical benefit rate (CBR; stable disease or better). Herein, efficacy endpoints were assessed in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population (all pts who received ≥60 mCi total administered dose of iopofosine I 131), and whose treatment regimen prior to iopofosine included a BTKi. Safety was evaluated using CTCAE v4.03 in pts who received ≥1 dose of iopofosine. Data cut off for this analysis was Jan. 16, 2026. Results: As previously reported, 65 pts were dosed and 55 are included in the mITT population. Of those, 22 (40%) had received a BTKi containing regimen immediately prior to iopofosine; and 11 who previously received at least 2 regimens utilizing BTKis and 12 who were refractory to rituximab. In this subgroup, median age was 70.5 (range 55-88), 17 (77%) were male, and 5 (23%) were female. The median number of prior therapies was 3 (range 2-7), 15/22 (68%) were MYD88 mutated and 18/22 (82%) were TP53 wildtype. The MRR was 15/22 (68.2%), ORR was 19/22 (86.4%) and CBR was 100%, median PFS was 12 months (range 1.6 to 28.0) and median TFS was 19.1 months (range 2.5-34.4). Grade ≥ 3, related treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) occurring in > 10% of pts included anemia (41%), leukopenia (41%), neutropenia (58%), and thrombocytopenia (86%). Conclusions: Iopofosine I 131 demonstrated significant efficacy; 100% CBR, 86.4% ORR and 68.2% MRR with a median PFS of 12 months (range: 1.6 – 28.0 months) in a pt population with no current standard of care therapy. The treatment was well-tolerated with a manageable toxicity profile with cytopenias as the only Grade 3 or greater TEAE. Based on the results of this pivotal trial, iopofosine I 131 could be a promising novel treatment for WM pts after BTKi therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02952508 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (16)
Jarrod Longcor
Cellectar Biosciences, Inc, Florham Park, NJ
Sikander Ailawadhi
17Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
Maria Gavriatopoulou
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Jennifer Peterson
Johns Hopkins University School of, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos
1Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
Ghassan El-Haddad
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
Levy Moshe
Texas Oncology – Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX
Judith Trotman
Jorge Julio Castillo
Bing Center for Waldenström Macroglobulinemia, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
Francisco J. Hernandez-Ilizaliturri
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
Ajay K. Nooka
Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta
Shirley D'Sa
1University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
Clark Cutrer
1University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, United States
Sheeba K. Thomas
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
Katherine Oliver
Cellectar Biosciences, Florham Park, NJ
Larry D. Anderson
1Myeloma, Waldenstrom’s, and Amyloidosis Program, Section of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX