Investigating clinical associations between genomic alterations and prostate cancer lineage states using circulating tumor cell RNA sequencing.

K Katharine Tippins (University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison, WI) J Joshua Michael Lang (University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI) M Marina Nasrin Sharifi (University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI) J Jamie M Sperger (University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI) S Shannon Reese (University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI) A Amy K Taylor (University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison, WI) V Viridiana Carreno (University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI) A Alex Chang (University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI) M Meghan Wells (Hematology/Oncology Facility, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI) J John M Floberg (University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI) H Hamid Emamekhoo S Shuang Zhao (Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Cluster Science, Beijing Key Laboratory of Photoelectronic/Electrophotonic Conversion Materials, Frontiers Science Center for High Energy Materials, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Advanced Technology Research Institute (Jinan), Advanced Research Institute of Multidisciplinary Science) D David Kosoff

Abstract

256 Background: Resistance to Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors (ARPI) in metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) is universal and can be driven by complex genomic alterations. The evolution of lineage state transitions from adenocarcinomas to neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) has also been shown to drive treatment resistance and poor survival. Identifying the timing and association of genomic mutations with lineage state transitions has been limited by the need for serial tumor biopsies. We report an integrated analysis of clinical next-generation sequencing (NGS) data and mPC lineage states with a novel circulating tumor cell (CTC) RNA sequencing methodology. Methods: We collected 273 samples from 117 unique patients with mPC in a prospective biomarker trial. CTCs were purified via immunomagnetic capture on an automated microfluidic technology and analyzed via RNA-seq. A subset of patients had a clinical grade genetic test performed on a contemporary metastatic tissue biopsy. We compared CTC gene expression for lineage states (luminal A, luminal B, NEPC) with somatic gene mutation subtypes known to confer resistance to ARPIs (AR, p53, RB, PTEN, HRR genes) and overall survival (OS). Results: Single sample pathway analysis of high CTC purity samples identified four transcriptional phenotypes: luminal A-like (LumA), luminal B-like (LumB), low proliferation (LP), and neuroendocrine (NE). Compared to patients with low CTC burden/purity (median OS not reached), patients with LumA and LP phenotypes had similar survival, patients with LumB and NE CTC phenotypes had shorter survival (LumB: median OS 6m, HR 9.1 [3.8-21.8], p<0.0001, NE: median OS 3.7m, HR 11.8 [2.4-57.2], p=0.0019). AR alterations were found in samples with prior ARPI exposure and at similar frequencies across all CTC phenotypes but NE where they were absent. RB mutations were enriched in the unfavorable CTC phenotypes (LumB, NE; p=0.0288). Integrating CTC phenotype with presence or absence of at least one high risk genomic alteration (AR, RB, TP53, PTEN), patients with favorable CTC phenotype (Low burden, LP and LumA) and no high risk alterations had the longest median survival (median OS NR), followed by patients with favorable phenotype but a high risk alteration (median OS 12.7m), patients with an unfavorable phenotype (LumB, NE) but no high risk alteration (median OS 8m), and unfavorable phenotype with a high risk alteration (median OS 4m). Conclusions: Somatic mutations in mCRPC influence lineage state acquisitions and treatment resistance. Lineage state transitions themselves are associated with poor outcomes and decreased survival which is worsened in the presence of high-risk genetic mutations including RB. This data presents potentially targetable patient populations that would benefit from treatment intensification and early disease monitoring for more aggressive mCRPC subtypes.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 5_suppl
Published February 10, 2025
Pages 256-256
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (13)

K

Katharine Tippins

University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison, WI

J

Joshua Michael Lang

University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI

M

Marina Nasrin Sharifi

University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI

J

Jamie M Sperger

University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI

S

Shannon Reese

University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI

A

Amy K Taylor

University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison, WI

V

Viridiana Carreno

University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI

A

Alex Chang

University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI

M

Meghan Wells

Hematology/Oncology Facility, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI

J

John M Floberg

University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI

H

Hamid Emamekhoo

S

Shuang Zhao

Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Cluster Science, Beijing Key Laboratory of Photoelectronic/Electrophotonic Conversion Materials, Frontiers Science Center for High Energy Materials, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Advanced Technology Research Institute (Jinan), Advanced Research Institute of Multidisciplinary Science

D

David Kosoff