Interim Results of the CMML intercept study: A prospective observational study to evaluate the role of acute inflammation in CMML disease progression
Abstract
Abstract Background: Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a universally fatal adult myeloid neoplasm with a median survival of 32 months and no approved therapies that alter its natural history. Although most patients initially present asymptomatically, disease progression (DP) is inevitable and its biological triggers remain poorly understood. Anecdotes and small case series suggest that acute inflammatory events (AIE) may precipitate hyperleukocytosis and DP in some patients, but fragmented care in the U.S. has hindered large-scale retrospective analyses. To address this gap, we launched a prospective, multi-institutional observational study to systematically evaluate the relationship between AIEs and DP. Our aim is to identify modifiable, cell-extrinsic stressors that contribute to disease destabilization and inform strategies for prolonging the indolent phase of CMML. Methods: We enrolled patients with WHO-defined CMML in a clinically asymptomatic state, defined by: (1) MPN-SAF TSS <20, (2) no CMML-directed therapy, (3) no symptomatic splenomegaly, and (4) transfusion independence. Key exclusions included active malignancy, uncontrolled infection, or inability to attend monthly visits. Over 24 months, participants underwent monthly interviews to document AIEs, including flares of chronic illness e.g. gout, infections, surgery procedures, cardiovascular events, and trauma. AIE severity was graded by hospitalization status. Blood samples were collected at each visit, with bone marrow collected when clinically indicated. Cytokine profiling was performed using Olink Reveal assays, and genomic data were integrated to assess mutation-specific inflammatory patterns. DP was defined by worsening symptoms (MPN-SAF TSS ≥20 with ≥50% increase), new transfusion needs, therapy initiation, symptomatic splenomegaly, or transformation to CMML-2/AML. Descriptive statistics summarized baseline and AIE data. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression models. Results: A total of 102 patients were enrolled over 2 years, with a median follow-up of 1 year (range, 0.5–1.5). The median age was 72 years; 71 were male and 31 female. By FAB criteria, 38 had myeloproliferative-type CMML, and 8 met WHO 2022 criteria for CMML-2. CPSS-Mol risk distribution was: 49.0% low, 26.5% intermediate-1, 37.3% intermediate-2, and 3.99% high. A total of 260 AIE were recorded in 77 patients. The most common AIEs were surgical procedures (n=115 events in 53 patients), flares of chronic disease (n=99 in 38), and infections (n=87 in 47). DP occurred in 28 patients: 18 met symptom-defined criteria, 13 met disease-defined criteria, and 3 met both. Longitudinal labs showed significant post-AIE increases in WBC (6.29 → 7.73 ×10⁹/L, p = 0.02) and platelets (112 → 131 ×10⁹/L, p = 0.03), with no change in hemoglobin (p = 0.27). Progressors had significantly lower hemoglobin than non-progressors (11.6 vs. 12.7 g/dL, p = 0.037), with no differences in WBC or platelet counts (p > 0.5). Among those with DP, 25 of 28 had at least one AIE. AIE presence was significantly associated with DP (OR 3.76, p = 0.04). Flares of chronic disease conferred a threefold increased risk of DP (OR 3.37, p = 0.008) and remained an independent risk factor after adjusting for CPSS-Mol risk (OR 3.6, p = 0.009). Severe AIEs requiring hospitalization trended toward higher risk but were not statistically significant (OR 2.3, p = 0.09). Among the 44 patients with genomic data, all AIE-positive patients (29/29) harbored at least one epigenetic regulator mutations (TET2, DNMT3A, ASXL1, IDH1/2), compared to 12/15 AIE-negative patients (p = 0.034). Signaling mutations (JAK2, CBL, NRAS, KRAS) were also enriched in AIE-positive cases (11/29 vs. 1/15, p = 0.035). No significant differences were found in spliceosome or tumor suppressor mutations. No genomic features distinguished progressors from non-progressors, regardless of whether there was an AIE. Conclusion: In this interim analysis of a prospective multi-institutional CMML cohort, AIE were significantly associated with DP. Ongoing work is aimed at sequentially annotating genomic alterations and profiling secreted factors before and after AIEs. While this study continues to accrue and mature, these findings support inflammation as a modifiable driver to CMML biology and progression and lay the groundwork for future studies investigating inflammatory or supportive interventions to delay disease evolution.
Article Details
Authors (25)
Zhuoer Xie
Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United States
Christy James
1Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States
Niraj Neupane
1Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States
Ekrem Turk
1University of South Florida/ H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Department of Malignant Hematology, Tampa, United States
Julie Braish
1Moffitt Cancer Center, Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tampa, United States
Hana Qasim
1Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States
Angela Consagra
30University of Florence, MDS Unit, Hematology, AOU Careggi - Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Florence, Italy
Maria Balasis
1Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States
Joshua Traina
1Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States
Zena Komrokji
1Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States
Christopher Ryder
1Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States
Amy McLemore
1Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States
Surendra Neupane
1Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States
Danielle Rud
4Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
Qianxing Mo
1Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States
Valeria Santini
7DMSC University of Florence, AOUC, MDS Unit, Hematology, Florence, Italy
Swayam Joshi
1Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States
Kavita Ghia
1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, United States
Andrew Kuykendall
Moffitt Cancer Cancer and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, United States
Jeffrey Lancet
Moffitt Cancer Cancer and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, United States
Rami Komrokji
Moffitt Cancer Cancer and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, United States
Dana Rollison
1Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States
David Sallman
Moffitt Cancer Cancer and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, United States
Mrinal Patnaik
5Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
Eric Padron
Moffitt Cancer Cancer and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, United States