Interferon signaling and outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in FinXX, CALGB 40603 (Alliance) and real-world clinico-genomic data.

S Saranya Chumsri (Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) Y Yi Liu S Sachin Kumar Deshmukh (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ) J Jodi Carter (Dept of Oncology, Edmonton, AB, Canada) H Heikki Joensuu R Roberto Antonio Leon-Ferre (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) D David Zahrieh (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) J Judy Caroline Boughey (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) J James N. Ingle (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) F Fergus Couch E Evanthia T. Roussos Torres M Maryam B. Lustberg (Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT) D Daniel G. Stover (Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center–James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus) W William M. Sikov (Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI) A Ann H. Partridge (Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston) L Lisa A. Carey (Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC Health, Chapel Hill, NC) G George W. Sledge M Matthew P. Goetz K Keith L. Knutson (Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) E E. Aubrey Thompson (Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL)

Abstract

569 Background: Several studies established the prognostic role of both the amount and locations of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in TNBC. Three distinct immunotypes were described based on the amount and locations of TILs: immune enriched (IN), immune excluded, and immune desert. Using single-cell spatial transcriptomic analysis in the Mayo Clinic TNBC cohort, our previous studies showed the central role of interferon (IFN) signaling in IN phenotype. Herein, we evaluated the association between IFN and outcomes in TNBC in 3 independent datasets. Methods: NanoString IO360 was performed in 114 samples from FinXX (NCT00114816) to generate 22-gene IFNα and 33-gene IFNγ signatures. RNA sequencing was performed in 388 samples from CALGB 40603 (NCT00861705). 3038 TNBC samples were tested by WTS (NovaSeq; Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ). Median values were used as cut-offs for high vs low IFNγ RNA expression and 18-gene IFNγ signature scores. Caris Life Science CODEai was used to evaluate real-world overall survival (OS) obtained from insurance claims and calculated from tissue collection to last contact using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, ANOVA, and Cox regression were used. Results: A high 22-gene IFNα signature score was associated with significantly improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) in FinXX (hazard ratio [HR] 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14-0.74, p 0.007) and OS (HR 0.28, 95%CI 0.12-0.66, p 0.003). Similar findings were observed with 33-gene IFNγ signature with significant improvement in RFS (HR 0.21, 95%CI 0.09-0.51, p < 0.001) and OS (HR 0.18, 95%CI 0.08-0.44, p < 0.001). Furthermore, in CALGB 40603, both IFNα and IFNγ scores were positively associated with pathologic complete response (pCR: IFNα p 0.019 and IFNγ p 0.007) and residual cancer burden (RCB: IFNα p 0.044 and IFNγ p 0.013). Using the Caris data platform to further validate, we identified 2899 TNBC patients (pts) with genomic and clinical outcome data. High IFNγ expression was associated with significant improvement in OS (25.95 vs 17.43 months; HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.59 – 0.72, p < 0.001). Similarly, pts with high IFNγ signature scores had significant improvement in median OS (25.79 vs 16.22 months; HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.6 – 0.73, p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study underscores the pivotal role of IFN signaling in TNBC. High IFNα and IFNγ signatures were consistently associated with improved RFS, OS, higher pCR rates, and lower RCB across clinical trial cohorts and real-world data. These findings signify IFN signaling as a potential key biomarker and therapeutic target in TNBC. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171; Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Mayo Clinic Breast Cancer SPORE (P50CA116201-17), Bankhead Coley, W81XWH-15-1-0292, P50CA015083, R35CA253187; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . Genentech. Clinical trial information: NCT00114816 and NCT00861705 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 569-569
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

S

Saranya Chumsri

Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

Y

Yi Liu

S

Sachin Kumar Deshmukh

Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ

J

Jodi Carter

Dept of Oncology, Edmonton, AB, Canada

H

Heikki Joensuu

R

Roberto Antonio Leon-Ferre

Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

D

David Zahrieh

Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

J

Judy Caroline Boughey

Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

J

James N. Ingle

Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

F

Fergus Couch

E

Evanthia T. Roussos Torres

M

Maryam B. Lustberg

Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

D

Daniel G. Stover

Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center–James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus

W

William M. Sikov

Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI

A

Ann H. Partridge

Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston

L

Lisa A. Carey

Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC Health, Chapel Hill, NC

G

George W. Sledge

M

Matthew P. Goetz

K

Keith L. Knutson

Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

E

E. Aubrey Thompson

Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL