Integrin α <sub>V</sub> β <sub>3</sub> -targeted imaging for identification of lung cancer and mapping of lymph-node metastases: A prospective, multicenter, self-controlled phase 3 trial (TRIIL study).
Abstract
8017 Background: Integrin α V β 3 mediates tumor formation, invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis. 99m Tc-3PRGD2, a first-in-class radiopharmaceutical targeting integrin α V β 3 , was advanced into a phase 3 clinical trial for evaluation of lung cancer via single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT), with mapping the lymph-node metastases as the primary objective. Methods: A prospective, multicenter, phase 3 trial of 99m Tc-3PRGD2 SPECT/CT enrolled 409 patients with solid lung lesions ≥ 1.5×1.0 cm in high suspicion of lung cancer (TRIIL; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04233476; chinadrugtrials.org.cn identifier: CTR20191465). A self-controlled design was used for a head-to-head comparison with the conventional metabolic imaging via F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18 F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT. The primary outcome was to define the superiority of diagnostic specificity of 99m Tc-3PRGD2 SPECT/CT over that of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in assessment of lymph-node metastases of lung cancer. The secondary outcomes included the other diagnostic values and safety. Results: No severe adverse event was observed in 407 patients with complete safety data. In 268 patients with pathological diagnosis of the lung tumors, no significant difference was found between 99m Tc-3PRGD2 SPECT/CT and 18 F-FDG PET/CT for detection of lung malignancies (sensitivity, 96% vs 98%, P = 0.083). In 259 patients with pathological diagnosis of 1601 lymph-node stations, 99m Tc-3PRGD2 SPECT/CT demonstrated superiority over 18 F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnostic specificity (74% vs 50%, P < 0.001) and accuracy (70% vs 55%, P < 0.001) for mapping the lymph-node metastases station-by-station, with a relatively lower sensitivity (55% vs 75%, P < 0.001) mainly due to spatial resolution limitation of the current SPECT systems. In a semi-quantitative analysis of the tumor-to-background ratios in each method, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.69 for 99m Tc-3PRGD2 SPECT/CT and 0.63 for 18 F-FDG PET/CT ( P = 0.13), respectively, for discriminating lymph-node stations with and without metastasis. In a case-by-case analysis, the integrin α V β 3 -targeting 99m Tc-3PRGD2 SPECT/CT corrected the false-positive diagnosis of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in 344 lymph-node stations from 152 (59%) of the 259 patients, providing more accurate evaluation of lymph-node metastasis in 116 (45%) patients, whereas 18 F-FDG PET/CT held better diagnosis of the lymph-node involvement only in 40 (15%) patients. Conclusions: This trial substantiates the advantages of the integrin imaging for mapping the lymph-node metastases of lung cancer, and paves the way for 99m Tc-3PRGD2 SPECT/CT to be evolved into a universally accessible and cost-efficient technique for tumor diagnosis and staging, and further towards precise therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT04233476 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (19)
Zhaohui Zhu
Department of Nuclear Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Diagnosis and Therapy in Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Shaoli Song
Department of Nuclear medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
Xuemei Wang
Shi Gao
China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
Xiaoli Lan
Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
Zhi Yang
Jun Xin
Xiangsong Zhang
Department: Department of Nuclear Medicine Institution: First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat‐Sen University Guangzhou Guangdong China
Xiaohong Ou
West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
Jianjun Liu
Sijin Li
Naixin Liang
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Huimin Sui
Guozhu Hou
Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
Rongxi Wang
Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
Hannan Gao
Haojun Chen
The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China
Hongda Chen
Fan Wang