Integrated multi-omics study identifies ursolic acid as a novel therapeutic agent targeting the TNF-α/TAK1/IKKβ/NF-κB axis in hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome
Abstract
Abstract Background Hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) is a lethal complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with limited targeted therapies. The busulfan-cyclophosphamide (BUCY) conditioning regimen induces endothelial injury, thereby initiating a thromboinflammatory cascade. While TNF-α/NF-κB signaling is implicated in this process, its precise role and therapeutic targeting in SOS remain undefined. Ursolic acid (UA), a natural pentacyclic triterpenoid, possesses anti-inflammatory properties, yet its efficacy and mechanism in SOS are unknown. Methods Multi-omics integration: Network pharmacology identified shared drug (BUCY, UA) and post-HSCT disease (SOS) targets and enriched pathways (supported by GEO/ArrayExpress analysis). Molecular docking and dynamics (MD) simulations (GROMACS) assessed binding affinities and stability. Subsequently, surface plasmon resonance (SPR) quantified UA-TNF-α binding. In vitro: Primary rat HSECs were treated with BUCY ± UA, NF-κB was overexpressed (OE-p65 plasmid) or inhibited (BAY 11-7082). Apoptosis (Annexin V/PI flow cytometry), ROS (DCFH-DA), mRNA (qPCR), and protein (WB) levels of TNF-α/NF-κB pathway components and antioxidants were measured. In vivo: SOS was induced in male SD rats with BUCY. Rats received prophylactic UA, AAV-shRNA-p65 (liver-specific NF-κB knockdown), or vehicle. Endpoints included hepatic sinusoidal injuries (histology), serum biomarkers (ELISA), liver ROS, liver function, apoptosis markers, and target pathway analysis. Results Target identification and binding: network pharmacology and transcriptomics identified TNF-α signaling as the top shared pathway (KEGG q=3.2x10⁻⁵). MD simulations revealed stable binding of BUCY metabolites (e.g., acrolein, ΔG=-8.2 kcal/mol) and UA to TNF-α (Tyr59/Trp107, ΔG=-9.3 kcal/mol). SPR confirmed high-affinity UA-TNF-α binding (Kd=0.32 ±0.05μM). UA suppressed TAK1/IKKβ phosphorylation by 82.3% (p<0.001). In Vitro: BUCY significantly induced HSEC apoptosis (↑3.3-fold, p<0.001) and ROS (↑3.8-fold, p<0.001), activating TNF-α, p-TAK1, p-IKKβ, p-IκBα, p65, and downstream cytokines (ICAM-1, VCAM-1, IL-1β, IL-6, MMP9). UA co-treatment attenuated apoptosis (↓70%, p<0.001), ROS (↓3.1-fold, p<0.001), and NF-κB pathway activation. OE-p65 mimicked BUCY damage; UA or NF-κB inhibitor reversed it. In Vivo: BUCY induced SOS (85% incidence), elevated serum TNF-α (↑4.1-fold), ALT/AST (↑4.3-fold), liver ROS, and caused severe HSEC ultrastructural damage (SEM/TEM: loss of fenestrae, basement membrane disruption). UA prophylaxis significantly reduced SOS incidence (35%, p<0.01), serum TNF-α (↓74.2%), ALT/AST (↓87.4%, p<0.01), ROS, and restored sinusoidal architecture, comparable to AAV-shRNA-p65. UA and shRNA-p65 both suppressed hepatic p65, ICAM-1, VCAM-1, IL-1β, IL-6, MMP9, and apoptosis markers (TUNEL↓, BAX↓, Caspase-3↓, FASL↓, Bcl-2↑). UA uniquely enhanced antioxidants (SOD1↑3.2-fold, CAT↑) early, mitigating a biphasic NF-κB response: early compensatory antioxidant upregulation (SOD1↑) transitioning to exhaustion (T-AOC↓63%, p<0.001) in sustained injury. UA outperformed shRNA-p65 in systemic cytokine suppression and apoptosis reduction (Caspase-3↓79.3% vs ↓52.1%, p<0.001). Conclusion TNF-α/NF-κB signaling critically drives BUCY-induced HSEC injury and SOS. UA, a first-in-class natural TNF-α inhibitor, binds TNF-α with high affinity, thereby blocking downstream TAK1/IKKβ/NF-κB activation. This mechanism suppresses endothelial inflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis. Significantly, UA's efficacy in preventing SOS and protecting HSECs equals or surpasses NF-κB knockdown, demonstrating its polypharmacology. Collectively, the study redefines SOS pathogenesis as “TNF-α-initiated thromboinflammation” and strongly supports UA's clinical translation for preventing SOS/endothelial complications in HSCT.
Article Details
Authors (8)
Jie Wei
College of Energy, College of Materials, State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, School of Life Sciences, College of Physical Science and Technology, Discipline of Intelligent Instrument and Equipment, iChEM, Fujian Key Laboratory of Advanced Materials
Yuan Long
Min Wu
Yumei Huang
Zhaoping Gan
1The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Department of Hematology, Nanning, China
Zhenbin Wei
Donghong Deng
1The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Department of Hematology, Nanning, China
Rongrong Liu