Integrated multi-omic profiling reveals two biologically distinct subgroups of splenic marginal zone lymphoma with prognostic relevance
Abstract
Abstract Splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) is a rare B-cell malignancy mainly affecting the spleen, bone marrow, and peripheral blood. Clinical outcomes are variable, with potential transformation into aggressive large B-cell tumors with poor survival rates. Despite advances in targeted therapies, specific biomarkers are urgently needed to guide treatment as incidence continues to rise. This study aims to extend our knowledge of SMZL biology by integrating genetic, phenotypic, transcriptomic, and epigenetic data to establish more precise molecular classifications aimed at guiding personalized treatments. We defined epigenetically distinct subtypes of SMZL using DNA methylation array data of 142 patients divided into a discovery (n=86, 60%) and a validation cohort (n=56, 40%). K-means clustering of the top 2000 most variable CpG sites consistently identified two similar clusters in both cohorts. Bootstrapped univariate survival analyses revealed significant differences in time to first treatment (TTFT) between these clusters in both the discovery (p=.007) and validation cohorts (p=.024). Subsequent clustering on the entire cohort allowed us to classify the subgroups as SMZL-HR (high risk, n=58, 41%) and SMZL-LR (low risk, n=84, 59%), reflecting the observed differences in TTFT. Twelve clinico-biological features were significantly enriched in SMZL-HR cases, including female sex (p<.001) , IGHV1-2*04 usage (p<.001), gene mutations (KLF2 (p<.001), KMT2D (p=.0015), TRAF3 (p<.001), NOTCH2 (p=.015), BCL10 (p=.007)) and chromosomal alterations (del(7q), gain(3q), gain(12q) (all p<0.01)). SMZL-HR patients also had higher rates of therapeutic intervention (p<0.001), disease transformation (p=0.01), and mortality (p<0.001) compared to SMZL-LR patients. Tumour mutational burden (TMB) (p<0.001) and the fraction of the SBS40 (p<0.001) mutational signatures were also increased in SMZL-HR compared to SMZL-LR. In contrast, SMZL-LR was associated with MYD88 mutations (p=.02), Trisomy 12 and 3 (p<.001 and p=.02). We found that the DNA methylation-based proliferative history score epiCMIT was significantly higher in SMZL-HR than SMZL-LR patients (p<0.001). TMB was positively correlated with epiCMIT (r=0.35, p<.001), reinforcing the link between extensive tumor proliferative histories and the acquisition of somatic mutations. Telomere length (TL) data (median 3.1, range: 2.38-7.57 kb) showed a significant negative correlation with epiCMIT (R=-0.3, p=.001). Transcriptomic comparisons of SMZL-HR and SMZL-LR revealed 399 differentially expressed genes (232 under-expressed, 167 overexpressed; FDR<.05, log fold change >1.5). Gene set enrichment analysis highlighted pathways linked to elevated cell division, specifically E2F targets (NES=1.98, p<.01) and the G2M checkpoint (NES=2.07, p<.01), and KAMMINGA_EZH2 targets (NES=1.91, p=.006). Taken together, these results suggest that SMZL-HR clones have a history of and higher potential for cellular division, potentiated by EZH2 targets associated with chromatin modification/stabilization, providing enhanced cellular resilience against replicative stress. Univariate Cox regression analysis tested the impact 60 clinico-biological features on TTFT and overall survival (OS). SMZL-HR status (HR: 2.0, p=.0013) and epiCMIT >median (HR: 1.67, p=.014) were significantly linked to shorter TTFT (5 vs. 16 months). Additionally, 46% of patients were classified into a poor-risk “NNK-like” group and 20% into the “High-M” group, as defined by Bonfiglio and Arribas, respectively. Both groups were associated with shorter TTFT (HR: 1.57 and 1.9, p=0.002 and 0.008, respectively). Significant predictors of shorter OS included the SMZL-HR epitype (HR: 2.5, p=.025). SMZL-HR patients had significantly shorter TTFT regardless of their Bonfiglio/Arribas classification. Multivariate Cox analysis (including 130 patients with 91 events) with 4 covariates (SMZL-HR, epiCMIT, NNK-like, High-M), revealed that SMZL-HR was the only independent variable in the final model (HR: 2.63, p=.001). Overall, this study presents a comprehensive framework that integrates (epi)genomic data with survival analysis, identifying two distinct disease entities, each with a discrete biological and clinical landscapes. This enhanced understanding supports the potential for improved personalized treatment strategies as well as better prognostic assessment for patients with SMZL.
Article Details
Authors (44)
Helen Parker
1University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
Ben Stevens
1University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
Amatta Mirandari
1University College London Cancer Institute, Research Department of Haematology, London, United Kingdom
Carolina Jaramillo-Oquendo
1University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
Martí Duran-Ferrer
Lara Buermann
1University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
Harindra Amarasinghe
3Radcliffe Department of Investigative Medicine, Oxford, United Kingdom
Jaya Thomas
1University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
Louise Carr
1University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
Shama Syeda
1University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
Methusha Sakthipakan
1University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
Marina Parry
1University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
Matthew Rose-Zerilli
1University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
Zadie Davis
17Department of Haematology, Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, United Kingdom
Neil McIver-Brown
4University Hospitals Dorset, Department of Molecular Pathology, Bournemouth, United Kingdom
Aliki Xochelli
5Institute of Applied Biosciences, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece
Sarah Ennis
Lydia Scarfò
School of Medicine, Università Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan
Paolo Ghia
School of Medicine, Università Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan
Christina Kalpadakis
9University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
Gerassimos Pangalis
20Department of Haematology, Athens Medical Center, Psychikon Branch, Athens, Greece
Davide Rossi
Institute of Oncology Research, Bellinzona, Switzerland
Matthew Ahearne
11University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom
Marc PD Dr. Seifert
13Universitatsklinikum Essen, Institut fur zellbiologie, Essen, Germany
Christoph Plass
Dieter Weichenhan
Eva Kimby
16Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Lesley Ann Sutton
15Karolinska Institutet, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm, Sweden
Richard Rosenquist
19Karolinska Institutet, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm, Sweden
Guy Pratt
10Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, UK, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Francesco Forconi
19Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
Kostas Stamatopoulos
Institute of Applied Biosciences at the Centre for Research and Technology Hellas
Marta Salido
17Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
Raja Prince-Eladnani
18Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, United States
Catherine Thieblemont
15Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Hémato-Oncologie and Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
Laura Hilton
2Center for Lymphoid Cancer, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
Ryan Morin
Renata Walewska
20University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth, United Kingdom
Jose Martin-Subero
4Centro de Investigación Biomédica en red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
David Oscier
8University Hospitals Dorset, Department of Haematology, Bournemouth, United Kingdom
Christopher Oakes
1Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, United States
Jane Gibson
Dean Bryant
1University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
Jonathan Strefford
1University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom