Insights into clonal and CBC changes at disease evolution among ccus patients

Y Yazan Jabban (1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States) R Rong He K Kurt Bessonen (1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States) P Patricia Greipp (1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States) D Dragan Jevremovic (1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States) D David Viswanatha (1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States) J James Foran (6Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Jacksonville, United States) T Talha Badar (Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States) C Cecilia Arana Yi (2Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, United States) Y Yael Kusne (5Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, United States) A Antoine Saliba (1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States) M Mehrdad Hefazi Torghabeh (2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States) A Aasiya Matin (1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States) W William Hogan (1Mayo Clinic, Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Rochester, United States) A Abhishek Mangaonkar (1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States) M Mithun Shah (1Mayo Clinic, Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Rochester, United States) H Hassan Alkhateeb (1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States) M Mrinal Patnaik (5Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States) A Aref Al-Kali (1Mayo Clinic, Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Rochester, United States)

Abstract

Abstract Background: Clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) is defined as clonal hematopoiesis in the absence of a hematologic neoplasm, along with unexplained cytopenia. While several studies have identified risk factors and developed scores to predict progression to overt myeloid neoplasms, the clinical and molecular features during the progression process remain poorly understood. Aim: Evaluate the clinical and clonal characteristics of patients with CCUS, with a focus on the longitudinal evolution of clonal and clinical parameters over time. Methods: After IRB approval, we retrospectively reviewed charts of patients with unexplained cytopenia (2015-2024), recording data at the time of CCUS diagnosis (WHO 2022 diagnostic criteria) and at time of follow-up bone marrow biopsy after diagnosis. Follow-up CBC and karyotype data were recorded for patients who had repeat bone marrow biopsies (n= 111), while follow-up clonal parameters and risk scores were calculated for those who underwent repeat NGS (n= 74). A reduction or expansion in clone size was defined as a change exceeding 5% (CE5%), or change exceeding 10% (CE10%) from the baseline value. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from diagnosis to last follow-up. For statistical analysis, we used BlueSky Statistics V10.3.1. Results: 214 CCUS patients (median age 73, 68% males) were included. At baseline, 30% of patients had abnormal cytogenetics, with del (20q) being the most common one (8%; n= 18), followed by trisomy 8 (6%; n= 13), and loss of chromosome Y (5%; n= 10). The median number of mutations was 2 (range, 1-5), with the most common mutations TET2 (38%), SRSF2 (21.5%), ASXL1 (21%), ZRSR2 (18.5%), DNMT3A (9.5%), and U2AF1 (9%). Most patients had high risk CHRS (60%), followed by intermediate (30%), and low risk (10%). On the other hand, 41% had high risk CCRS, 29% had intermediate risk, and 30% had low risk. After a median follow-up of 46 months, 62 patients died (median OS not reached). A decrease in the white blood cell (WBC) count from the time of diagnosis to follow-up was more frequently seen among CCUS patients who progressed to MN (70% vs 50%, p= 0.04), however, changes in hemoglobin and platelets did not differ between those who progressed and those who did not (p> 0.05). Although the frequency of abnormal karyotypes at diagnosis was similar between patients who eventually progressed (28%) and those who did not (31%) (p= 0.6), 4 (2%) patients with initially normal karyotypes acquired chromosomal abnormalities during follow-up, and all progressed to MDS. Among the 74 patients who had follow-up NGS, 31% acquired new mutations, clonal expansion of pre-existing mutations were seen in 54% using CE5% and 19% per CE10%, and 16% developed new variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Acquiring new pathogenic mutations was similar in patients who progressed to MN compared to those who did not progress (34% vs 28%, p= 0.6). On the other hand, clonal expansion was significantly more observed in patients who progressed compared to those who did not, using both CE5% (73% vs 31%, p = <0.001) and CE10% (27% vs 9%, p= 0.03). At follow-up, ASXL1 was the most commonly acquired mutation among patients who did not progress (4 cases), followed by TET2 (2 cases), and U2AF1, GATA2, DNMT3A, SF3B1, ZRSR2, TP53, and CBL (1 case each). On the other hand, SRSF2, SETBP1, CBL, JAK2, TET2, and RUNX1 were more frequently acquired among those who progressed to myeloid neoplasms (each appeared in 2 patients). When recalculating CCRS, CHRS, IPSS-M, and IPSS-R at follow-up for patients who had repeat NGS, there was no significant difference in score changes - either upward or downward - between those who progressed and those who did not (p> 0.05). Conclusion: In CCUS patients who progressed to myeloid neoplasms, WBC decline, clonal expansion (more frequent), and evolving chromosomal aberrations (less frequent) were observed, supporting the value of longitudinal genomic and clinical monitoring in CCUS.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 5621-5621
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (19)

Y

Yazan Jabban

1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States

R

Rong He

K

Kurt Bessonen

1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States

P

Patricia Greipp

1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States

D

Dragan Jevremovic

1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States

D

David Viswanatha

1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States

J

James Foran

6Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Jacksonville, United States

T

Talha Badar

Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States

C

Cecilia Arana Yi

2Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, United States

Y

Yael Kusne

5Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, United States

A

Antoine Saliba

1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States

M

Mehrdad Hefazi Torghabeh

2Mayo Clinic, T Cell Engineering Laboratory, Rochester, United States

A

Aasiya Matin

1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States

W

William Hogan

1Mayo Clinic, Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Rochester, United States

A

Abhishek Mangaonkar

1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States

M

Mithun Shah

1Mayo Clinic, Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Rochester, United States

H

Hassan Alkhateeb

1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States

M

Mrinal Patnaik

5Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States

A

Aref Al-Kali

1Mayo Clinic, Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Rochester, United States