Inotuzumab ozogamicin leads to high rates of measurable residual disease negativity for patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in morphologic remission

H Hannah Goulart (1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, Houston, United States) E Elias Jabbour (Department of Leukemia The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA) N Nitin Jain F Fadi Haddad J Jayastu Senapati (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center) R Rita Khouri (1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, Houston, United States) G Guillermo Garcia-Manero W William Wierda (1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States) F Farhad Ravandi (Department of Leukemia The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA) N Naveen Pemmaraju (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States) K Kelly Chien (1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, Houston, United States) R Rebecca Garris (1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States) N Nicholas Short (1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States) H Hagop Kantarjian (2Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX)

Abstract

Abstract Background The eradication of measurable residual disease (MRD) is essential for sustaining long-term remission in patients (pts) with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-cell ALL). Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is a CD22-targeting antibody that demonstrates efficacy in the frontline and relapsed/refractory setting. Here, we provide the 3-year updated results from a phase 2 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of reduced dose InO in pts with B-cell ALL in morphologic remission with detectable MRD. Methods Adult pts with B-ALL in remission with detectable MRD were eligible. For pts with Philadelphia (Ph)-negative ALL, MRD positivity was defined by least 1x10-4 by multiparameter flow cytometry (FCM) and/or any level by next-generation sequencing (NGS) for immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor gene rearrangements (IG/TR) at sensitivity of 1x10-6. For pts with Ph-positive ALL, MRD positivity was defined as a ratio of BCR::ABL1 to ABL1 by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of ≥0.01% or detectable MRD at a level of at least 1x10-4 by FCM and/or any level by NGS for IG/TR. InO was administered at 0.6 mg/m2 on Day 1 and 0.3 mg/m2 on Day 8 of Cycle 1, and 0.3 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8 of Cycles 2-6. All pts received ursodiol for hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) prophylaxis. Pts with Ph-positive ALL received a concomitant BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Results Between November 201-May 2025, 37 pts with a median age of 49 years (range, 19-71 years) were enrolled. Twenty-eight pts (76%) were in first complete remission (CR1) and 9 (24%) were in CR2 and beyond. Twenty pts (54%) had Ph–positive ALL. The remaining pts (n=17, 46%) had Ph-negative ALL; 8 pts (47%) had Ph-like ALL. Twenty-four pts (65%) received prior blinatumomab, 4 pts (11%) previously received CAR T, and 5 pts (14%) had previously undergone allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT). Pts received a median of 3 cycles (1-6) of InO. Twenty-five pts (68%) responded and achieved MRD-negativity by either FCM, NGS, or PCR overall. For pts with Ph-negative ALL, 12 (71%) received InO for MRD-positivity by FCM; 10 of these pts (83%) became MRD-negative by FCM after a median of 0.87 months (0.7-1.4). Nine out of 11 (81%) pts with available NGS-MRD testing became NGS-MRD negative. For pts with Ph-positive ALL, 9 (45%) received InO for MRD-positivity by FCM (7 of these pts [78%] also had positive BCR::ABL1 transcripts); all of these pts (100%) became MRD-negative by FCM after a median of 0.9 months (0.7-1.7). Nine pts (45%) with negative MRD by FCM received InO for BCR::ABL1 transcript positivity; 2 of these pts (22%) became BCR::ABL1 transcript negative after a median of 0.8 months (0.7-0.9). Four out of 6 (67%) pts with available NGS-MRD testing became NGS-MRD negative. Out of all enrolled pts, 7 (19%) received InO for isolated NGS-MRD positivity; 4 (57%) became NGS-MRD negative. At last follow-up, 11 pts (32%) have relapsed (including 3 non-responders and 8 responders; 7 in CR1 and 4 in CR2+; none had received ASCT prior to relapse; 3 had become NGS-MRD negative with InO). 19 pts (51%) remain alive in CR and 7 pts (19%) died in CR (n=2 septic shock, n=1 renal failure, n=1 multiorgan failure, n=1 hospice care, n=2 unknown). Of the pts who achieved NGS-MRD negativity, (n=13), 3 (23%) relapsed (none received ASCT). Only 1 pt received ASCT post achievement of NGS-MRD negativity. After a median follow-up of 39 months (1-63), the median overall survival (OS) was 40 months, with a 3-year OS rate of 59%. The median OS for Ph-positive ALL vs. Ph-negative ALL was 61 months vs. 40 months (p=0.99), with 3-year OS rates of 67% vs. 55%, respectively. The median OS for pts treated in CR 1 vs. CR2+ was 61 months vs. 14 months (p=0.06). In responding pts who achieved MRD-negativity (either by FCM or NGS) to InO, for pts who underwent ASCT vs. no ASCT, the 3-year OS rate was 71% vs. 56%, respectively, (p=0.6), with 3-year EFS rates of 57% vs. 44%, respectively (p=0.43). Most adverse events were low grade; SOS occurred in 3 pts (8%): 1 pt with Ph-negative ALL developed SOS 2 weeks after ASCT and recovered with defibrotide; 2 pts with Ph-positive ALL developed SOS while on concomitant ponatinib. Conclusion InO results in high rates of MRD-negativity in pts with B-cell ALL and positive MRD, with clearance of MRD by FCM and NGS achieved in the majority of pts. Our data support the use of InO as an effective and safe method of MRD-eradication, especially in earlier lines of treatment.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 3348-3348
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (14)

H

Hannah Goulart

1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, Houston, United States

E

Elias Jabbour

Department of Leukemia The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA

N

Nitin Jain

F

Fadi Haddad

J

Jayastu Senapati

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

R

Rita Khouri

1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, Houston, United States

G

Guillermo Garcia-Manero

W

William Wierda

1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States

F

Farhad Ravandi

Department of Leukemia The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA

N

Naveen Pemmaraju

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States

K

Kelly Chien

1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, Houston, United States

R

Rebecca Garris

1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States

N

Nicholas Short

1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States

H

Hagop Kantarjian

2Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX