Initial treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia with low-dose high-frequency rituximab followed by addition of acalabrutinib

C Charles Chu (2Department of Medicine and Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, United States) C Clare Heffernan (1University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, United States) N Nydia Jaimes-Delgadillo (1University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, United States) C Christine Herne (1University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, United States) J Jennifer Bruno (1University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, United States) A Andrea Baran P Paul Barr (1University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, United States) R Ronald Taylor (3University of Virginia, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Charlottesville, United States) J John Ashton M Michael Elliott (Sanger Heart and Vascular Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States) C Clive Zent (2Department of Medicine and Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, United States)

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Rituximab is effective at removing circulating CLL cells by inducing antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP). This ADCP could be limited by low CLL cell CD20 levels (innate or acquired), intrinsic CLL cell resistance to ADCP, inadequate serum levels of antibody or complement, or finite innate immune cytotoxic capacity. We conducted correlative studies on samples from our phase II clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03788291) for treatment-naïve CLL patients with progressive disease starting with low-dose, high-frequency rituximab monotherapy followed by addition of the second-generation covalent binding Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) acalabrutinib to obtain data to improve the performance of this regimen. Methods: Thirty-eight untreated CLL patients with progressive disease received 50 mg intravenous (IV) rituximab on cycle 1 day 1 (C1D1), followed by 50 mg of subcutaneous (SQ) rituximab 48h later (C1D3), and then 50 mg SQ rituximab twice weekly for 23 weeks. Acalabrutinib (100 mg every 12h) was initiated on C1D8 and continued for at least one year. Peripheral blood samples were collected pre-treatment on day 1 (C1D1pre), one hour after start of IV infusion (C1D1-1h), at completion of infusion (C1D1post), on day 3 before and after SQ rituximab (C1D3pre, C1D3post), on day 8 before and after therapy (C1D8pre, C1D8post), on day 15 before and after therapy (C1D15pre, C1D15post), and on day 1 of each subsequent 4-week cycle until C7D1 and then on C9D1. These samples were assessed for CLL cell counts, complement C3 fragment deposition, and cell marker levels (e.g. CD20) by flow cytometry. Serum complement (CH50 titer) and rituximab levels were assayed. Single-cell RNA sequencing was performed on seven patient samples. Lymph node volume was measured clinically. In vitro ADCP assays evaluated CLL cell sensitivity to antibody-mediated cytotoxicity. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: Low-dose IV rituximab rapidly reduced median circulating CLL cells to 15% of baseline (95% CI 8%-27%) within 1h, with no further decrease at infusion completion (p=0.94). By C1D3pre, CLL counts rebounded to 76% of baseline (95% CI 70%-83%; p<0.0001) with a slight reduction (68% of baseline) at C1D3post (95% CI 60%-80%; p=0.004), but no significant reduction (78% of baseline) at the end of the first week (C1D8pre, 95%CI 71%-90%; p=0.32). Serum rituximab was 2.2 mg/ml (95%CI 1.3-2.7) at 1h and significantly higher 10.3 mg/ml (95%CI 5.3-13.4) at C1D1post (p<0.0001). CLL cell CD20 levels decreased by C1D1-1h to 67% of baseline (95%CI 53%-73%; p=0.002) and to 42% (95%CI 33%-55%) of baseline at C1D1post (p<0.0001). CH50 decreased throughout the rituximab infusion to a nadir of 55 units/ml (95%CI 47-64; p<0.0001), which is within normal range (38.9–89.9 units/ml). Palpable lymph node volume decreased to 34% (95%CI 22%-48%) of baseline after one week. C1D8 addition of acalabrutinib mobilized CLL cells into circulation with an increase to 210% of baseline by C1D15 (p<0.0001). CLL cell counts subsequently decreased to 2.7% of baseline by C9D1 (p<0.0001). Compared to C1D8pre, CLL CD20 levels decreased to 56% (95% CI 44%-71%; p=0.0004) after 1 week of acalabrutinib therapy (C1D15pre). During this week, expression of CLL cell MS4A1 (coding for CD20) decreased to 48%(95%CI 0.44-0.53; p<0.0001). CD20 levels remained stable over the subsequent duration of rituximab therapy (C2D1 to C7D1; p=0.68) and thenCD20 levels increased following cessation of rituximab therapy (C7D1 to C9D1; p=0.004). Conclusion: One week of low dose rituximab effectively reduced CLL tumor burden. Clearance of circulating CLL cells stopped within 1h of initiation of first rituximab IV dose. This was not due to insufficient serum rituximab, low serum complement, or loss of CLL cell CD20. Alternative explanations include limited innate immune cytotoxic capacity and innate CLL cell resistance to ADCP. Resistance to ADCP is currently being tested in vitro on these samples. Addition of acalabrutinib was associated with improved treatment response and a significant decrease in expression of MS4A1 by circulating CLL cells with progressive decrease in CLL cell CD20 levels until cessation of rituximab therapy. This was likely due to BCR pathway signaling inhibition by acalabrutinib. These data suggest that BTKi could decrease the efficacy of antibody therapy and could be informative about the design of future clinical trials.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 2131-2131
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (11)

C

Charles Chu

2Department of Medicine and Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, United States

C

Clare Heffernan

1University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, United States

N

Nydia Jaimes-Delgadillo

1University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, United States

C

Christine Herne

1University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, United States

J

Jennifer Bruno

1University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, United States

A

Andrea Baran

P

Paul Barr

1University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, United States

R

Ronald Taylor

3University of Virginia, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Charlottesville, United States

J

John Ashton

M

Michael Elliott

Sanger Heart and Vascular Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

C

Clive Zent

2Department of Medicine and Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, United States