Initial phase 1b/2 study results of purinostat mesylate (PM) in combination with pomalidomide (POM) and low dexamethasone (DEX) in patients with RRMM.

L Lijuan Chen (Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University) H Huili Cai (10Yichang Central People's Hospital, Yichang, China) J Jin Lu (Center for Biological Physics, Arizona State University) T Ting Niu (Department of Hematology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu) N Na Gao Z Zhihua Zhang (State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai 200237, China) B Baijun Fang (1Department of Hematology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, zhengzhou, China) Z Zhenyu Yan (State Key Laboratory of Supramolecular Structure and Materials, Department of Chemistry Jilin University Changchun P. R. China) K Ke Tan (10Chengdu Zenitar Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd, Chengdu, China) R Rui Liang (State Key Laboratory of Discovery and Utilization of Functional Components in Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai Frontiers Science Center of TCM Chemical Biology, Institute of Interdisciplinary Integrative Medicine Research and Shuguang Hospital) W Wei Zhang

Abstract

TPS7581 Background: MM remains an incurable disease and resistance mechanisms are emerging. PM is a high selective HDAC I/IIb inhibitor. In phase I study, PM monotherapy had shown good tolerability and efficacy in relapsed/refractory (RR) hematologic malignancies including MM. A phase 1b/2 study is being conducted to further assess the efficacy and safety of PM combined with POM and low DEX (80mg/cycle) in RRMM. Methods: The ongoing phase 1b/2 study includes dose escalation followed by dose expansion. Eligible RRMM had received ≥1 prior line of therapy (LOT) including ≥1 PI and ≥1 IMiD. Cohort A (21D cycle) and Cohort B (28D cycle) of the PM combination regimens are assessed using 3+3 escalation design. Pts in Cohort A receive PM at levels of 4, 6, 8.4, 11.2 and 15mg/m 2 IV on D1,4,8,11; POM 4mg QD on D1-14; DEX 20mg on D1,4,8,11. Pts in Cohort B receive PM at same dose range to Cohort A, on D1,4,15,18; POM 4mg QD on D1-21; DEX 20mg on D1,4,15,18. Pts continue to receive PM until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary outcomes are DLT and ORR. Secondary outcomes include PFS et al. Results: As of Dec 23, 2025, 27 Pts were recruited including 6 in Cohort A and 21 in Cohort B. The dose had been escalated to 6mg/m 2 and 11.2mg/m 2 in Cohort A and B. Cohort A: Median age was 61.5 years, 66.7% male, 16.7% had prior ASCT. 2 (33.3%) Pts had high risk cytogenetics, including 1q21 duplication (n=1), t (4;14) (n=1) and 1p32 deletion (n=1). 6 Pts were evaluable with median 1 (1-3) prior LOT. The ORR was 50% with 1 sCR and 2 PR along with 1 MR. With a median F/U of 138 days, the median PFS was 151 days (95% CI, 21-NR). Median DOR was NR. The most common ≥ G3 TEAEs were neutropenia (83.3%), lymphocytopenia (83.3%) and thrombocytopenia (100%). No DLT was reported. Cohort B: Median age was 61.0 years, 57.1% male, 19.1% had prior ASCT and 19.1% had extramedullary disease (EMD). 7 (33.3%) Pts had high risk characteristics, including 1q21 duplication (n=7), t (4;14) (n=2) and early relapse after ASCT (n=3). Median prior LOT is 2 (1-5). Among 16 evaluable Pts, the ORR was 37.5% with 1 sCR, 1 CR, 3 VGPR and 1 PR; additional 4 Pts achieved MR. In 7 Pts given the dose of 8.4mg/m 2 , the ORR was 42.9% with 3 VGPR; 3 more Pts achieved MR. With median F/U of 104 days, the median PFS and DOR were NR. The most common ≥ G3 TEAEs were neutropenia (81.0%), lymphocytopenia (61.9%) and thrombocytopenia (38.1%). 1 DLT (G4 neutropenia) was reported. Moreover, in 4 Pts with EMD, 2 achieved objective response. In 4 Pts with super high risk (Double or Triple Hit/early relapse), 1 achieved sCR and 1 achieved VGPR. 1 Pt with prior 5-line therapy including BCMA-ADC had shown VGPR after treatment. Conclusion: PM as a highly selective HDACi in combination with POM and low DEX shown encouraging efficacy and safety in RRMM. Complicated cases with EMD, super high-risk characteristics or heavily pretreatment can benefit from the PM triplet therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT06484829 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (11)

L

Lijuan Chen

Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University

H

Huili Cai

10Yichang Central People's Hospital, Yichang, China

J

Jin Lu

Center for Biological Physics, Arizona State University

T

Ting Niu

Department of Hematology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu

N

Na Gao

Z

Zhihua Zhang

State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai 200237, China

B

Baijun Fang

1Department of Hematology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, zhengzhou, China

Z

Zhenyu Yan

State Key Laboratory of Supramolecular Structure and Materials, Department of Chemistry Jilin University Changchun P. R. China

K

Ke Tan

10Chengdu Zenitar Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd, Chengdu, China

R

Rui Liang

State Key Laboratory of Discovery and Utilization of Functional Components in Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai Frontiers Science Center of TCM Chemical Biology, Institute of Interdisciplinary Integrative Medicine Research and Shuguang Hospital

W

Wei Zhang