Induction ipilimumab plus nivolumab followed by consolidating chemoradiotherapy as bladder-sparing treatment in stage II/III urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: The phase 2 Indi-Blade trial.
Abstract
LBA637 Background: Radical cystectomy remains the most commonly used curative treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Bladder-sparing options are typically for patients (pts) with limited tumors, or those unfit for cystectomy. Effective systemic induction therapy could broaden the population eligible for bladder-sparing treatment. The NABUCCO trial showed promising pathological complete responses (43-46%) and a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 70% using neoadjuvant ipilimumab (ipi) + nivolumab (nivo) in stage III MIBC pts. We hypothesize that induction immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is an effective bladder-sparing approach in MIBC pts. Methods: Indi-Blade is a multicenter, single-arm, phase-II trial, enrolling cT2-4aN0-2 MIBC pts. Treatment consists of ipi 3mg/kg (day 1), ipi 3mg/kg + nivo 1mg/kg (day 22) and nivo 3mg/kg (day 43), followed by standard-of-care CRT using mitomycin C and fluoropyrimidines (5FU or capecitabine. The primary endpoint is two-year bladder-intact event-free survival (BI-EFS), estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Events are defined as muscle-invasive, nodal or distant recurrence; cystectomy; switch to chemotherapy or death by any cause. With a two-sided alpha of 0.05, a sample size of n = 50 has 81.3% power to exclude an estimated BI-EFS of 50% (median 24 months), with a target two-year BI-EFS of 70% (median 46.6 months). Secondary endpoints include OS, toxicity and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis. Results: 50 pts were enrolled between February 2022 and February 2024. Pts had cT2N0 (22; 44%), cT3N0 (21; 42%) and cN+ (7; 14%) MIBC. 45/50 pts (90%) proceeded to CRT following induction ICI. After a median follow-up of 28.7 months (interquartile range 22.6 – 34.7), the primary endpoint of estimated two-year BI-EFS was met at 76% (95%CI 0.65-0.89; p < 0.001). Estimated two-year OS was 96% (95%CI 0.9-1.0). Grade ≥3 immunotherapy-related AEs occurred in 24% of pts; grade ≥3 CRT related AEs occurred in 6%. ctDNA positive status was associated with significantly shorter BI-EFS compared to ctDNA negatives at both baseline (HR = 4.5, p = 0.02) and after induction ICI (HR = 6.1, p = 0.02). Pts who were ctDNA negative at baseline or post-ICI had an 88.6% and 88.4% two-year BI-EFS, respectively. ctDNA clearance in baseline ctDNA positive pts occurred in 76.9% (10/13 evaluable pts) post-ICI and 91.7% (11/12) post-CRT. Conclusions: Induction ipi + nivo followed by CRT provided encouraging two-year BI-EFS and OS in MIBC pts. ctDNA negative pts at either baseline or post-ICI had high rates of BI-EFS. Potent systemic induction ICI followed by CRT is an effective bladder-sparing treatment strategy for a broad population of MIBC pts. Clinical trial information: NCT05200988 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Jan-Jaap Jelmer Mellema
Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Chantal Stockem
Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Cameron Herberts
Natera, Inc., Austin, TX
Samantha K. Cheung
Natera, Inc., Austin, TX
Daniel J. Vis
Bas W.G. Van Rhijn
Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Laura Mertens
Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Thierry N. Boellaard
Maurits L. van Montfoort
Sara Balduzzi
Jeantine De Feijter
Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Johannes Cornelis van der Mijn
Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Joost L Boormans
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
Martine Franckena
Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
Richard Meijer
University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Juus L. Noteboom
University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Eva E. Schaake
Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Debbie G.J. Robbrecht
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
Britt B.M. Suelmann
University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Michiel S. Van Der Heijden
Department of Medical Oncology Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam Netherlands