Increased FXII activation in endovascular treated stroke patients on periprocedural antithrombotic treatment

A Angelique Ceulemans (1Maastricht Medical Center+, Department of Neurology, Maastricht, Netherlands) A Aarazo Barakzie (3Erasmus MC Cardiovascular Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Hematology, Rotterdam, Netherlands) M Moniek de Maat (3Erasmus MC Cardiovascular Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Hematology, Rotterdam, Netherlands) S Samantha Donkel (3Erasmus MC Cardiovascular Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Hematology, Rotterdam, Netherlands) H Heleen van Beusekom (4Erasmus MC Cardiovascular Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Division of Experimental Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Rotterdam, Netherlands) R Rick Dijkhuizen (5University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Translational Neuroimaging Group, Center for Image Sciences, Utrecht, Netherlands) B Bob Roozenbeek (6Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Rotterdam, Netherlands) D Diederik Dippel (6Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Rotterdam, Netherlands) W Wim van Zwam (Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands) H Hugo ten Cate (Department of Internal Medicine and Thrombosis Expertise Center, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands) H Henri Spronk (11Maastricht University Medical Center+, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht, Netherlands) R Robert van Oostenbrugge (8Maastricht University Medical Center+, Department of Neurology, Maastricht, Netherlands) M Magdolna Nagy (13Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Department of Biochemistry, Maastricht, Netherlands)

Abstract

Abstract Endovascular treatment (EVT) for large vessel occlusion in acute ischemic stroke patients (AIS) improves reperfusion rates, yet a considerable number of patients do not recover despite successful recanalization. Microvascular occlusions may underlie these reperfusion failures after EVT and periprocedural antithrombotic agents - unfractionated heparin (UFH) and/or acetylsalicylic acid (ASA)- may be administered to mitigate these complications. However, the MR CLEAN MED Trial, investigating the safety and efficacy of periprocedural UFH, ASA or UFH+ASA in AIS patients undergoing EVT, found an association between administration of these antithrombic agents and a higher rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages. Our recent work showed that EVT elicited activation of the contact system and microthrombi formation in a large animal stroke model. Neutrophil activation and NETosis may also impact secondary thromboinflammation, potentiating thrombogenesis even in the presence of UFH and ASA, while exacerbating bleeding risk. Thus, safer and more effective antithrombotic drugs are needed. Prior studies implicate neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) in AIS through direct cellular activation, coagulation stimulation, and inflammation. Heparin can dismantle NETs, potentially improving outcomes; however, links between NETs and coagulation activity in AIS patients remain unclear. To better characterize the thrombo-inflammatory mechanisms in humans we carried out a prespecified substudy of the MR CLEAN MED Trial, addressing plasma biomarkers, exploring the full coagulation cascade alongside markers of neutrophil activation/NETosis. The clinical outcomes included function (in)dependence (mRS), mortality, stroke severity (NIHSS) and follow-up infarct volume (FIV). Plasma samples collected at three time points (T0 = baseline; T1 = 1 hour post-EVT; T2 = 24 hours post-EVT) of 216 patients from the MR CLEAN MED Trial, were included. Coagulation activity was assessed by measuring activated coagulation factor (F) XII (FXIIa), FXIa, FIXa, FXa, FVIIa and thrombin (T) in complex with their natural inhibitors (antithrombin (AT), C1-esterase inhibitor (C1Inh) or alpha-1-antitrypsin (a1AT)) using ELISA. NETs markers (Histone-DNA, MPO-DNA complex, citrullinated Histone H3) were measured with ELISA. Correlations between coagulation activity and NETs were analyzed via Pearson correlation; related-Samples Friedman's two-way ANOVA by ranks and multivariable regression was used for analyzing differences in coagulation and associations with outcomes, including interaction terms for coagulation activity and NETs. Among patients receiving EVT only (n=53), FXIIa:AT and FXIIa:C1Inh showed no significant changes over time. In the UFH (n=60) and UFH+ASA (n=55) groups, FXIIa:AT significantly increased at T1 compared to baseline (UFH: 35.8 pM [17.2–111.2] vs. 116.5 pM [52.9–284.5], p=0.002; UFH+ASA: 31.2 pM [20.8–76.1] vs. 94.8 pM [45.2–182.0], n.s.), returning to baseline by T2 (31.2 pM [16.2–51.5], p=0.000; 28.5 pM [12.6–57.3], p=0.016, respectively). ASA-treated patients (n=48) showed a significant increase in FXIIa:C1Inh at T1 (1210.2 pM [990.1–1368.0] vs. 1478.4 pM [1224.3–1590.6], p=0.031). FXIa:C1Inh showed a similar pattern in the ASA group, but not in UFH-treated patients. In the UFH+ASA group, FXIa:a1AT decreased at T1 versus baseline (29.5 pM [13.7–65.1] vs. 18.1 pM [3.6–37.4], p=0.071), returning near baseline at T2 (33.5 pM [5.4–47.0], n.s.). Standard care showed no change in FXIIa or FXIa, but FVIIa:AT increased at T1 (153.3 pM [80.2–386.7] vs. 302.3 pM [190.0–761.3], n.s.). Coagulation activity showed low to moderate correlation with NETs markers in all groups. In the UFH+ASA group, there was a moderate to strong correlation between FXIIa:AT and FXIa:a1AT, FXIa:α1AT and FXa:AT, and FXIa:a1AT and histone-DNA. No significant associations were found between coagulation activity and outcomes. In summary, periprocedural antithrombotic treatment in EVT-treated stroke patients increased FXII activation compared to EVT only. However, coagulation activity did not associate with outcomes, nor were interactions found between NETs presence and coagulation activity on outcome measures. Based on these and previous animal data, FXIIa or downstream FXIa ± NETosis inhibition may hold promise to improve periprocedural antithrombotic management, balancing efficacy and bleeding risk.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 1358-1358
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (13)

A

Angelique Ceulemans

1Maastricht Medical Center+, Department of Neurology, Maastricht, Netherlands

A

Aarazo Barakzie

3Erasmus MC Cardiovascular Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Hematology, Rotterdam, Netherlands

M

Moniek de Maat

3Erasmus MC Cardiovascular Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Hematology, Rotterdam, Netherlands

S

Samantha Donkel

3Erasmus MC Cardiovascular Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Hematology, Rotterdam, Netherlands

H

Heleen van Beusekom

4Erasmus MC Cardiovascular Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Division of Experimental Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Rotterdam, Netherlands

R

Rick Dijkhuizen

5University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Translational Neuroimaging Group, Center for Image Sciences, Utrecht, Netherlands

B

Bob Roozenbeek

6Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Rotterdam, Netherlands

D

Diederik Dippel

6Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Rotterdam, Netherlands

W

Wim van Zwam

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands

H

Hugo ten Cate

Department of Internal Medicine and Thrombosis Expertise Center, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands

H

Henri Spronk

11Maastricht University Medical Center+, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht, Netherlands

R

Robert van Oostenbrugge

8Maastricht University Medical Center+, Department of Neurology, Maastricht, Netherlands

M

Magdolna Nagy

13Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Department of Biochemistry, Maastricht, Netherlands