Incorporation of Novel Synthetic Glycolipids in Liposomal Nanoparticles Affects Opsonization and In Vivo Clearance
Abstract
ABSTRACT Mimicking cell membrane glycocalyx, saccharide modification of nanoparticles offers a potent means to regulate their in vivo fate. Here, we investigate how glycosylation (i.e., glucose, galactose, fructose, mannose, and N ‐acetylglucosamine) regulates liposomal nanoparticle interactions with plasma proteins and immune cells, which further determine their biodistribution and therapeutic efficacy. While fructose conferred the greatest enhancement in tumor cell uptake in vitro, N ‐acetylglucosamine‐modified nanoparticles achieved the highest tumor accumulation and markedly attenuated systemic clearance in vivo, highlighting a pronounced disparity between in vitro and in vivo performance. The compromised in vivo efficacy of glycosylated nanoparticles was linked to significant clearance in blood, liver, and spleen, primarily mediated by blood monocytes, hepatic stellate cells, and splenic macrophages. Proteomics revealed that adsorption of immunoglobulin G (IgG) and complement C3 facilitates in vivo clearance of nanoparticles. Moreover, IgG deposition further promotes subsequent C3 binding. Notably, N ‐acetylglucosamine markedly mitigates IgG and C3 adsorption, leading to prolonged circulation and enhanced tumor accumulation and inhibition. Benefiting from glycosylation‐regulated protein corona, doxorubicin‐loaded N ‐acetylglucosamine‐modified liposomal nanoparticles achieved superior antitumor efficacy compared with other glycosylated formulations. This study establishes a clear correlation between glycosyl ligand identity, protein corona composition, and in vivo performance, providing fundamental insights for rational design and clinical translation of glycosylated nanomedicines.
Article Details
Authors (19)
Yingjie Yu
Xuehan Li
State Key Laboratory of Marine Food Processing and Safety Control Key Laboratory of Marine Drugs Chinese Ministry of Education Ocean University of China Qingdao China
Yu Gao
Shijia Tao
State Key Laboratory of Marine Food Processing and Safety Control Key Laboratory of Marine Drugs Chinese Ministry of Education Ocean University of China Qingdao China
Xiaofei Li
Institute of Crystalline Materials
Lemei Zhao
State Key Laboratory of Marine Food Processing and Safety Control Key Laboratory of Marine Drugs Chinese Ministry of Education Ocean University of China Qingdao China
Wenshuai Han
State Key Laboratory of Marine Food Processing and Safety Control Key Laboratory of Marine Drugs Chinese Ministry of Education Ocean University of China Qingdao China
Hao Fan
Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ying Qiu
Man Wang
State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines (SKLNM) and Department of Medicinal Chemistry
Luying Zhou
State Key Laboratory of Marine Food Processing and Safety Control Key Laboratory of Marine Drugs Chinese Ministry of Education Ocean University of China Qingdao China
Xiaoyan Fang
Wenhua Yang
Haiyang Zhang
School of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics
Volker Mailänder
Department of Dermatology University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg‐University Mainz Germany
Daniel Crespy
Department of Materials Science and Engineering School of Molecular Science and Engineering Vidyasirimedhi Institute of Science and Technology VISTEC Rayong Thailand
Katharina Landfester
Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research
Shuai Jiang
State Key Laboratory of Chemical Reaction Dynamics and Dalian Coherent Light Source, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics
Xiangzhao Mao