Incentive valence differentially engages open- and closed-loop basal ganglia circuits during movement initiation

N Neil M. Dundon (Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California) E Elizabeth J. Rizor (Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California) J Joanne E. Stasiak (Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California) J Jingyi Wang T Taylor Li (Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California) K Kiana Sabugo (Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California) C Christina Villanueva (Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California) P Parker Barandon (Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California) V Viktoriya Babenko (Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California) R Renee Beverly-Aylwin (Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California) A Alexandra Stump (Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California) T Tyler Santander (Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies) A Andreea C. Bostan (Aligning Science Across Parkinson’s Collaborative Research Network) R Regina C. Lapate (Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California) S Scott T. Grafton (Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California)

Abstract

Incentives modulate voluntary movement, yet the circuitry channeling these signals into motor output remains unclear. Classical models emphasize a closed-loop circuit (CLC) linking dorsal putamen (PUTd) with the motor cortex, but this pathway is anatomically segregated from affective processing regions. Anatomical and clinical evidence point to an alternative: an open-loop circuit (OLC) from ventral putamen (PUTv) that may route affective signals to the motor cortex. Here, we conducted two experiments to test whether a functional OLC exists in humans and whether it is differentially engaged by incentive conditions. First, in 7 T resting-state fMRI (multi-echo), PUTv showed robust functional connectivity with both affective and motor regions, including the cingulate motor area, even after accounting for PUTd variance. This connectivity pattern supports the plausibility of an independent pathway linking affective basal ganglia regions to the motor cortex. Second, in 3 T task fMRI (incentivized reaching), jackpot (high-reward) and robber (high-loss avoidance) incentive conditions produced distinct behavioral and neural signatures. Jackpot produced a speed–accuracy trade-off, with faster movement initiation but more false starts. Neurally, this coincided with reduced engagement (BOLD responses relevant for initiation speed) in CLC nodes but not in OLC. Robber, in contrast, eliminated engagement in both OLC and CLC nodes, instead recruiting stopping-related regions (e.g., subthalamic nucleus), consistent with an avoidance phenomenology. Together, these findings support a versatile architecture for movement initiation that flexibly engages distinct cortico-subcortical circuits depending on incentive phenomenology, and offer a candidate mechanism through which affective salience and valence modulate voluntary movement.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 123, Issue 19
Published May 12, 2026
ISSN 0027-8424
Publisher National Academy of Sciences

Authors (15)

N

Neil M. Dundon

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California

E

Elizabeth J. Rizor

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California

J

Joanne E. Stasiak

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California

J

Jingyi Wang

T

Taylor Li

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California

K

Kiana Sabugo

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California

C

Christina Villanueva

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California

P

Parker Barandon

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California

V

Viktoriya Babenko

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California

R

Renee Beverly-Aylwin

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California

A

Alexandra Stump

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California

T

Tyler Santander

Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies

A

Andreea C. Bostan

Aligning Science Across Parkinson’s Collaborative Research Network

R

Regina C. Lapate

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California

S

Scott T. Grafton

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California