INCB057643, a bromodomain and extra-terminal protein inhibitor, in combination with ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis: A phase 1 study of safety and efficacy

J Justin Watts (2Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Medicine, Miami, United States) A Anthony Hunter (3Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, United States) J Junichiro Yuda (4National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan) A Ahmed Abdulgawad (2Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom) A Anna Halpern (1University of Washington, Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), Seattle, United States) M Maria Teresa Gomez Casares (Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain) E Ellen Ritchie (2Weill Cornell Medical College, Department of Medicine, New York, United States) R Rosa Ayala Diaz (1Hospital 12 de Octubre, Hematología, Madrid, Spain) F Francesca Palandri (2Seragnoli Hematology Institute, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy) A Alessandra Iurlo (1Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy) J Jesus Maria Hernandez Rivas (8Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, IBSAL, IBMCC, CSIC, Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Salamanca, Spain., Hematology Department, Salamanca, Spain) V Vikas Gupta K Keita Kirito B Brandi Reeves (2University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Chapel Hill, United States) P Pankit Vachhani (25University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Center, Birmingham, United States) P Prithviraj Bose (5University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States) M Massimiliano Bonifacio (1University of Verona, Department of Engineering for Innovation Medicine, Section of Innovation Biomedicine, Verona, Italy) B Brandon McMahon (1University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Hematology, Aurora, United States) S Srinivas Tantravahi (16Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, United States) J Jun Choi (2NYU Langone Health, Perlmutter Cancer Center, Medical Oncology and Hematology, New York, United States) A Alessandro Lucchesi (3IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Hematology Unit, Meldola, Italy) K Kittika Poonsombudlert (1University of Iowa Healthcare, Department of Hematology, Oncology, Blood & Bone Marrow Transplantation, Iowa City, United States) L Lea Burke (24Incyte Corporation, Wilmington, United States) F Feng Zhou F Fred Zheng (24Incyte Corporation, Wilmington, United States) A Alessandro Maria Vannucchi (10University of Florence, Florence, Italy)

Abstract

Abstract Background: The pathophysiology of myelofibrosis (MF) and other hematologic malignancies is modulated by the epigenetic reader bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) protein. Combination therapy with the BET inhibitor INCB057643 and the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor ruxolitinib (RUX) has been shown to synergistically reduce levels of various pro-inflammatory cytokines, reduce disease burden, and reverse bone marrow fibrosis in myeloproliferative neoplasm models. Methods:This analysis of an ongoing phase 1, open-label, 3+3 dose-escalation/expansion study (NCT04279847) is evaluating INCB057643 combination therapy (during dose escalation: starting dose 4 mg once daily [qd] up to the maximum tolerated dose of 10 mg qd established with INCB057643 monotherapy; during dose expansion: starting dose 4 mg qd or 8 mg qd given continuously) as add-on to RUX in adults with MF and suboptimal response to RUX or who were JAK inhibitor (JAKi) naive. The INCB057643 starting dose for each patient was selected based on baseline platelet count, and intra-patient dose upward titration was allowed based on protocol-defined criteria (up to 10 mg qd). Safety and tolerability is the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints include spleen volume response (≥35% reduction from baseline [SVR35] at Week 24), symptom response (≥50% reduction from baseline in Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form total symptom score [TSS50] at Week 24), and anemia response (sustained hemoglobin increase ≥1.5 g/dL [if transfusion independent at baseline] or transfusion independence [if dependent at baseline] for ≥12 weeks). Results:As of March 17, 2025,23 patients were treated in dose escalation (all with suboptimal response to RUX; 11 ongoing) and 13 in dose expansion (all ongoing; suboptimal response to RUX, n=9; JAKi-naive, n=4). Median (range) INCB057643 exposure was 334 (85–749) days in dose escalation; in dose expansion, exposure was 112 (12–172) days in suboptimal response to RUX and 27 (19–34) in newly enrolled JAKi-naive patients. All patients were evaluable for safety. Thrombocytopenia (50%, n=18/36) was the most common treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 39% (n=14/36) of patients, with the most common (≥20%) being thrombocytopenia (22%, n=8/36) and anemia (22%, n=8/36). Serious TEAEs occurred in 25% (n=9/36) of patients, with 6% (n=2/36; grade 3 hematoma and grade 3 pyrexia) considered related to INCB057643 treatment. Gastrointestinal (17%, n=6/36) and hepatic (alanine aminotransferase increased, 8% [n=3/36]; aspartate aminotransferase increased, 8% [n=3/36]) TEAEs related to INCB057643 treatment were uncommon and manageable (all were grade 1–2). There were no fatal events that were considered related to INCB057643 treatment. One patient experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (6 mg, thrombocytopenia), and 2 patients had leukemic transformation (4 mg and 8 mg; both with suboptimal response to RUX and multiple high-risk factors for leukemic transformation, with 1 in accelerated phase at baseline). Among patients with a Week 24 efficacy assessment (all of which were in the suboptimal response to RUX group), SVR35 was achieved by 5 of 23 (22%) evaluable patients at Week 24 and by 8 of 28 (29%) patients as best overall response (BOR) at any time. SVR25 at Week 24 was reached by 8 of 23 (35%) patients, and 10 of 28 (36%) patients had a BOR of SVR25. At Week 24, 11 of 21 (52%) evaluable patients achieved a TSS50; 20 of 29 (69%) patients had a BOR of TSS50, and 21 of 29 (72%) had TSS30. Durable anemia response lasting ≥12 weeks occurred in 7 of 28 (25%) evaluable patients, regardless of transfusion status at baseline. Conclusions:INCB057643 combination therapy with RUX was generally well tolerated on a continuous dosing schedule, with few treatment-related serious TEAEs and no treatment-related fatal events, and was associated with improvement in spleen size, marked improvement in symptom burden, and anemia responses. Dose expansion is ongoing for the 4- and 8-mg combination in both the add-on therapy group and in JAKi-naive patients.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 5574-5574
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (26)

J

Justin Watts

2Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Medicine, Miami, United States

A

Anthony Hunter

3Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, United States

J

Junichiro Yuda

4National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan

A

Ahmed Abdulgawad

2Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom

A

Anna Halpern

1University of Washington, Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), Seattle, United States

M

Maria Teresa Gomez Casares

Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain

E

Ellen Ritchie

2Weill Cornell Medical College, Department of Medicine, New York, United States

R

Rosa Ayala Diaz

1Hospital 12 de Octubre, Hematología, Madrid, Spain

F

Francesca Palandri

2Seragnoli Hematology Institute, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy

A

Alessandra Iurlo

1Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy

J

Jesus Maria Hernandez Rivas

8Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, IBSAL, IBMCC, CSIC, Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Salamanca, Spain., Hematology Department, Salamanca, Spain

V

Vikas Gupta

K

Keita Kirito

B

Brandi Reeves

2University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Chapel Hill, United States

P

Pankit Vachhani

25University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Center, Birmingham, United States

P

Prithviraj Bose

5University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States

M

Massimiliano Bonifacio

1University of Verona, Department of Engineering for Innovation Medicine, Section of Innovation Biomedicine, Verona, Italy

B

Brandon McMahon

1University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Hematology, Aurora, United States

S

Srinivas Tantravahi

16Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, United States

J

Jun Choi

2NYU Langone Health, Perlmutter Cancer Center, Medical Oncology and Hematology, New York, United States

A

Alessandro Lucchesi

3IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Hematology Unit, Meldola, Italy

K

Kittika Poonsombudlert

1University of Iowa Healthcare, Department of Hematology, Oncology, Blood & Bone Marrow Transplantation, Iowa City, United States

L

Lea Burke

24Incyte Corporation, Wilmington, United States

F

Feng Zhou

F

Fred Zheng

24Incyte Corporation, Wilmington, United States

A

Alessandro Maria Vannucchi

10University of Florence, Florence, Italy