Inadequate social support and household material hardship among children with pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A report from the Children's oncology group Trial AALL1731
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: Parents of children with cancer living in poverty experience higher rates of psychological distress during childhood cancer treatment and existing psychosocial interventions have been less effective for this population. High parental distress predicts poor mental health for parents and children in survivorship and impairs cognitive bandwidth and executive function–key for decision-making and treatment adherence. Household material hardship ([HMH] food, housing, utility or transportation insecurity), a concrete poverty measure, is independently associated with 2 to 5 times the risk of severe psychological distress among parents of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Identifying risk factors for HMH that may be modifiable with supportive care interventions is critical to improve disparities in parental distress. Social support—the perceived availability of emotional and tangible support from family, peers and the community—has been linked to better coping, lower psychological distress, and improved health-related outcomes in adult oncology. Its relationship to HMH in childhood cancer has not been explored. We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the Children's Oncology Group (COG) trial AALL1731, the first COG ALL trial to systematically collect parent-reported social determinants of health, examining the association between social support and HMH at start of ALL therapy. Methods: Children ages 1-9 with de novo NCI standard risk B-ALL, who spoke English, Spanish or French and enrolled on AALL1731 (NCT03914625) at a US or Canadian site from September 2020 to July 2024 could opt-in to a longitudinal, correlative “Household Material Hardship and Neurocognitive Late Effects” study. Parents/guardians of participants completed a 75-item survey at 4-timepoints: baseline (during Induction), start of maintenance, end of therapy, and 1-year post-therapy. This secondary, interim analysis explored the association between baseline parent-reported social support and baseline HMH. The primary exposure of interest was social support as measured by the validated 8-item Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (mMOS-SSS)—which uses a Likert scale to query how often someone is available to help you in domains of emotional (e.g. turn to for suggestions about a personal problem) and concrete (e.g. prepare meals) supports—dichotomized as inadequate social support (mMOS-SSS <70) vs adequate (≥70). The primary outcome of HMH was defined as present (at least one of food, housing, utility or transportation insecurity) vs absent. Univariable and multivariable analyses adjusting for child race/ethnicity, age, sex, insurance, primary language, marital status, and parent education were performed. Results: A total of 1487 participants contributed data from 179 sites; of these 1067 (72%) had evaluable mMOS-SSS and HMH data to comprise the analytic cohort. Participants were mostly mothers (76%), married (79%), and preferred English as a primary language (81%). Half of patients (52%) were Non-Hispanic White, 25% Hispanic, and 7% Black; 330 (31%) reported inadequate social support. In unadjusted logistic regression, participants with inadequate social support had 4.1-times (95% CI 3.1, 5.4) higher odds of HMH at baseline. Upon adjustment, those with inadequate social support had 2.9-times (95% CI 2.1, 3.9) higher odds of HMH. Analyses of associations between baseline social support and longitudinal development of HMH and parent psychological distress are pending mature data. Conclusion: Inadequate social support at the start of ALL therapy is independently associated with the presence of HMH—a known risk factor for severe parent psychological distress during cancer treatment. These data identify social support as a potential target for interventions to improve parent and child well-being. Parents of children with ALL face substantial and prolonged psychosocial burdens due to financial, logistical, and emotional strain over the >2-year care trajectory. We will investigate whether adequate social support protects against financial toxicity (including the development of new HMH) and parent psychological distress during treatment once data mature. Future work will include partnering with parents and psychosocial providers to adapt existing models of social support interventions (individualized psychobehavioral interventions, peer-based interventions, and community-based interventions) for the pediatric oncology setting.
Article Details
Authors (21)
Selena Murcia Mendez
1University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Pediatrics, Dallas, United States
Morgan Paul
3Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Data Science, Boston, United States
John Kairalla
2University of Florida - Children's Oncology Group, Gainesville, United States
Cindy Wang
Department of Biostatistics, Colleges of Medicine, Public Health, and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville
Sunyu Kang
2Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Data Science, Boston, United States
Sarah Alexander
Division of Haematology–Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto
Peter Cole
5Rutger's Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, New Brunswick, United States
Iris Paltin
1Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, United States
Rahela Aziz-Bose
1Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, United States
Colleen Kelly
1Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, United States
Haley Newman
1Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Division of Oncology, Philadelphia, United States
Daniel Zheng
Mignon Loh
13Ben Towne Center for Childhood Cancer Research and the Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Elizabeth Raetz
11NYU Langone Health, New York, United States
Stephen Hunger
9Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, United States
Meenakshi Devidas
Department of Global Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
David Teachey
4Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Division of Oncology and Center for Childhood Cancer Research, Philadelphia, United States
Rachel Rau
10Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, United States
Sumit Gupta
Division of Haematology–Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto
Kira Bona
5Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
Puja Umaretiya
4UT Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, Dallas, United States