In-class transition from bortezomib to ixazomib-based regimens in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: A retrospective, observational, real-world study conducted in China
Abstract
Abstract Background Proteasome inhibitors (PIs) are cornerstone therapeutic agents in the management of multiple myeloma. Given that myeloma typically necessitates long-term treatment, intravenous PIs such as bortezomib are often associated with treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs). For transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), transitioning from initial bortezomib (V)-based induction therapy to a regimen incorporating the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib may provide a more convenient and sustainable approach to prolonged PI therapy, while maintaining favorable efficacy and safety profiles. This real-world study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of such a transition strategy in this patient population. Method This ongoing study is a single-center, non-interventional, retrospective analysis conducted on patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma (MM), utilizing data from the Chinese National Longitudinal Cohort of Haematologic Diseases (NICHE)-MM registry. This registry is a longitudinal database maintained by the Institute of Haematology, Blood Diseases Hospital (IHBDH) in China. The retrospective analysis included adult patients aged ≥18 years with transplant-ineligible NDMM who underwent an in-class transition from bortezomib to ixazomib-based regimens between April 12, 2018, and March 31, 2024. Data were obtained from the NICHE-MM registry. The primary endpoint of the study was the overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints encompassed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results A total of 107 transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM received initial induction therapy with bortezomib-based regimens, followed by a transition to ixazomib-based continuous therapy. The median age was 63 years (range: 33–80), with 49% of the patients being male. The majority (77%) had an ECOG performance status of 0–1. Additionally, 36% of patients were classified as ISS stage III, 24% had R-ISS stage III disease. Comorbidities were observed in 52% of patients, including hypertension (48%), renal disorders (23%), cardiovascular disorders (29%), diabetes (16%), liver disorders (23%), and cerebrovascular diseases (4%). Patients received a median duration of 3.4 months (range: 0.1–16.3 months) of initial treatment with V-based regimens. The most common V-based regimens included VRd (bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone, 48.6%), Vd (bortezomib, dexamethasone, 28.0%), VCd (bortezomib, cyclophosphamid, dexamethasone, 23.4%), VAd (bortezomib, Aclarubicin, dexamethasone, 11.2%), and others. Following initial treatment, patients transitioned to ixazomib (I)-based regimens for continuation therapy. The most frequently used I-based regimens were IRd (Ixazomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone, 50.5%), Id (Ixazomib, dexamethasone, 31.8%), ICd (Ixazomib, cyclophosphamid, dexamethasone, 7.5%), and others. The ORR following the treatment transition was 79%. Among these patients, 68% achieved a very good partial response (VGPR) or better, and 47% achieved a complete response (CR). As of March 31, 2025, with a median follow-up of 34.9 months, the median PFS was 38.0 months (95% CI: 28.78, not reached), with a 12-month PFS rate of 80%. The median OS had not been reached, and the 12-month OS rate was 92%.. The safety profile of ixazomib was consistent with findings from previous clinical trials. Conclusion The findings of our real-world study conducted in China align with those of the US-MM6 real-world study carried out in the U.S. population. This observational study involving transplant-ineligible NDMM patients in China indicates that switching from bortezomib to ixazomib-based regimens allows for extended continuous PI-based therapy, offering favorable efficacy, acceptable safety, and enhanced treatment convenience. Despite the presence of multiple comorbidities among the patient cohort, this therapeutic strategy may serve as a viable treatment option for individuals with transplant-ineligible NDMM.
Article Details
Authors (9)
Jieqiong Zhou
1State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300020, China
Gang An
Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Tianjin, China
Yuntong Liu
1Department of Medical Oncology, LeBow Institute for Myeloma Therapeutics and Jerome Lipper Myeloma Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
Wenqiang Yan
1State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300020, China
Chenxing Du
1State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300020, China
Shuhui Deng
1State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300020, China
Weiwei Sui
1State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China
Yan Xu
Lugui Qiu