Improved outcomes in 17,908 acute myeloid leukemia patients across last three decades: Results from the multinational pethema registry
Abstract
Abstract Background: The therapeutic landscape of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has evolved substantially over the past three decades. While intensive chemotherapy (IC) was the mainstay until the mid-2000s, the advent of hypomethylating agents (HMA), venetoclax-based regimens, and targeted therapies (e.g., FLT3 or IDH1 inhibitors) has changed clinical practice, especially in older or unfit patients. However, population data describing the evolution of patient characteristics, treatment allocation, and outcomes remain limited. Methods: Out of 21,371 patients, we retrospectively analyzed 17,908 evaluable adult patients with newly diagnosed AML (non-APL) reported to the PETHEMA epidemiologic registry (NCT02607059) between 1990 and 2024 (Spain, Portugal, Colombia, Chile, Mexico, and Uruguay). Patients were grouped into three eras based on major therapeutic changes: 1990–2006 (one size fits all), 2007–2016 (tailored therapies), and 2017–2024 (targeted therapies). Variables included baseline characteristics, treatment and outcomes. Survival analyses used Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression. Results: Median age at diagnosis increased over time, from 62 years in 1990–2006 to 65 years in 2017–2024 (p<0.001), with patients aged ≥80 increasing from 6.9% to 14%. Despite this, baseline ECOG ≥2 decreased from 31% to 21% (p<0.001). Secondary AML increased from 20% to 31%, while extramedullary disease declined from 25% to 16% (p<0.001). No significant differences were observed in sex distribution. Hemoglobin levels declined slightly (median 9.0 to 8.8 g/dL; p=0.019), while median white blood cell and platelet counts remained stable through eras. Serum creatinine and bilirubin slightly decreased (p<0.001), and albumin increased modestly (p<0.001), suggesting improved baseline condition at diagnosis. Frontline treatment strategies evolved markedly. IC remained predominant but declined from 80% (in 1990-2006) to 67% (in 2017-2024), p<0.001. Non-intensive therapies rose from 1.1% to 23% (p<0.001), while best supportive care (BSC) declined from 20% to 10%, indicating broader access to active treatment. Within the IC group, conventional 7+3-like regimens remained dominant until 2016 (around 90%) but decreased to 71% in 2017–2024, with increasing use of CPX-351 (5.2%), IC+FLT3 inhibitors (10%), and IC+gemtuzumab ozogamicin (2.7%). In the non-intensive setting, venetoclax + HMA combinations emerged as a key component (31% in 2017-2024), although HMA monotherapy remained the most frequently administered option (48%). In contrast, low-dose cytarabine-based regimens declined from 65% to 16%. CR/CRi rates remained stable in the three periods for IC (65% vs. 61% vs. 63%%). The proportion of patients transplanted in first CR/CRi remained stable (23% vs. 18% vs. 20%). A shift from autologous to allogeneic transplant was evident: autologous transplant use declined from 15% to 3%, while allogeneic transplant increased from 8% to 17% (p<0.001). Among 17,908 patients, median overall survival (OS) improved significantly from 9.3 months in 1990–2006, 9.3 months in 2007-2016, and 12.8 months in 2017–2024 (p<0.001). In univariate analysis, OS improved in most subgroups during the last diagnostic period, including all age categories, both sexes, patients with ECOG <2, de novo AML, those treated with front-line IC (from 12.9 to 20.4 months), those who underwent allogeneic or autologous transplantation, and even among non-transplanted patients. However, no significant gains were observed in patients with ECOG ≥2, secondary AML, or those treated with non-intensive therapies or BSC. Median OS among patients aged <50 increased from 27.2 to 65.8 months, from 5.8 to 10.3 months among those aged 65–74, and from 3.0 to 6.1 months among those aged 75–79. Median OS for ECOG ≥2 patients remained poor across all periods (approximately 3 months). Survival in the BSC group declined from 1.6 to 0.6 months. In multivariate analyses, the diagnostic period remained independently associated with OS after adjusting for age, sex, AML type, ECOG status, transplant, and treatment strategy (p<0.001). Conclusions:This large real-world study spanning more than three decades highlights substantial improvements in survival and evolving treatment patterns in AML. Despite an older population, better functional status and supportive care, and increased use of both intensive and non-intensive active therapies likely contributed to improved outcomes.
Article Details
Authors (55)
Jorge Labrador
1Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain
David Martinez-Cuadron
2Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain
Cristina Gil
Hospital Alicante, alicante, Spain
Mar Tormo
Hospital Clinico Universitary. INCLIVA Research Institute, Valencia 46010, Spain
Josefina Serrano
University Hospital Reina Sofia. IMIBIC. UCO, Cordoba, Spain
Pilar Martinez Sanchez
Hematology Department. Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
Eduardo Rodríguez-Arbolí
Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS/CSIC), University of Seville, Seville, Spain
Jose-Mario Mariz
8Instituto Portugués de Oncología Francisco Gentil de Oporto, IPO, Oporto, Portugal
Fernanda Trigo
9Centro Hospitalar São João, Oporto, Portugal
Teresa Bernal del Castillo
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias–Instituto Universitario del Principado de Asturias–Instituto Universitario de Oncología del Principado de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
Juan Miguel Bergua Burgues
Hospital San Pedro de Alcántara. Cáceres, Caceres, Spain
Carlos Rodríguez-Medina
Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas De Gran Canaria, Spain
Olga Salamero
13Hospital U. Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
Joana Brioso Infante
14Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisboa, Portugal
Juan Manuel Alonso-Domínguez
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ma, Canada
Pilar Herrera Puente
16Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Madrid, Spain
María Luz Amigo
17Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain
Susana Vives
18Hospital U. Germans Trias i Pujol ICO Badalona, Badalona, Spain
Raimundo García-Boyero
Hospital General Universitario de Castellón, Castellón, Spain
Lorenzo Algarra
37Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, Spain., Hematology Department, Albacete, Spain
Mercedes Colorado
Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
Monica Romero
22Hospital Guillermo Grant Benavente, Concepción, Spain
Claudia Sossa
23Clínica FOSCAL, Bucaramanga, Colombia
Maria Vidriales Vicente
24Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
Armando Mena Duran
25Hospital General de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
Celina Benavente
26Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
Esperanza Lavilla-Rubira
27Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain
Maria Jose Sayas Lloris
28Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset, Valencia, Spain
Emília Cortesão
29Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Veronica Lizama
30Hospital del Salvador, Providencia, Chile
Olga Arce-Fernández
31Hospital de Basurto, Bilbao, Spain
María García-Fortes
Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain
Maria Dolores Madrigal
33Hospital U. Virgen de la Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
Manuel Perez Encinas
34Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, USC, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Marta Valero-Nuñez
35Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain
Luis Felipe Casado Montero
4Hospital General Universitario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
Maria Teresa Olave Rubio
37Hospital Clínico U. Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
Ágata Almela
38Hospital Universitario de León, León, Spain
Diana Cuervo
39Hospital San José, Bogotá, Colombia
Victor Noriega Concepción
40Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, La Coruña, Spain
Marcela Espinoza
41Clínica Dávila, Santiago, Chile
Beatriz De Rueda Ciller
42Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
Manuel Barrios García
43Hospital Universitario Regional de Málaga, Málaga, Spain
Rosa Fernández
Bernardo Gonzalez Gonzalez
19Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain., Hematology Department, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
Carmen Montes
46Hospital Virgen de la Concha, Zamora, Spain
Christine Rojas
47Hospital Gustavo Fricke, Valparaíso, Chile
Esther Pérez-Santaolalla
48Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain
María Lourdes Amador Barciela
38Complejo Hospitalario Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain., Hematology Department, Pontevedra, Spain
ANA Yurena Oliva Hernandez
50Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Tenerife, Spain
Rebeca Rodriguez-Veiga
2Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain
Isabel Cano
2Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain
Evelyn Acuña-Cruz
2Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain
Antonio Solana-Altabella
Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe; Dep. of Pharmacy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
Pau Montesinos
Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain