Impact of unplanned readmission to the same facility within 30 days following robot-assisted and laparoscopic hemicolectomy for early-onset non-metastatic colon cancer.

Abstract

111 Background: Colon cancer in younger populations has risen in recent years, prompting changes in screening guidelines. Hemicolectomy remains integral for standard treatment for non-metastatic early-onset colon cancer, and many institutions have adopted robot-assisted approaches for this procedure. However, high costs associated with this technology along with mixed data regarding survival benefits and post-surgical complications warrant further investigations on the specific advantages of robot-assisted surgery. This study aims to examine the impact of unplanned readmission to the same facility within 30 days following surgery for patients receiving robot-assisted and laparoscopic hemicolectomy on long-term survival for early-onset non-metastatic colon cancer to see how current paradigms of colon cancer treatment extend to early-onset patients. Methods: The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients under the age of 50 receiving a minimally invasive hemicolectomy for primary non-metastatic colon cancer diagnosed between 2016-2020. Patients were stratified based on surgical approach and whether they underwent an unplanned readmission to the same facility within 30 days following surgery, and survival differences were calculated log-rank test and Cox regression analysis that included co-variates related to tumor characteristics, patient demographics, and facility characteristics. Results: 5,076 patients were identified, with 577 receiving a robot-assisted approach and 4,499 receiving a laparoscopic approach. Multivariate analysis found no significant difference in long-term survival between patients receiving a laparoscopic versus robot-assisted approach (HR: 0.893, 95% CI: 0.687-1.161, p=0.398). Additionally, multivariate analysis found that unplanned readmission within 30 days did not have a significant impact on long-term survival outcomes for patients receiving a robot-assisted approach (HR: 0.856, 95% CI: 0.257-2.848, p=0.800), but it did find worsened survival outcomes for the laparoscopic approach (HR: 1.535, 95% CI: 1.070-2.203, p=0.020). Conclusions: Patients receiving laparoscopic hemicolectomy for early-onset non-metastatic colon cancer appear to have worsened overall long-term survival outcomes when undergoing an unplanned readmission to the same facility within 30 days of surgery when compared to patients receiving a robot-assisted surgical approach. However, it also appears that overall, both surgical approaches have similar overall long-term survival. Further research on how robot-assisted surgery impacts survival and post-surgical complications in patients with early-onset non-metastatic colon cancer is warranted to examine how this advancing technology could improve cancer care.