Impact of timing of diagnosis and breastfeeding on postpartum breast cancer outcomes.

D Daniella Klebaner (Stanford University Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford, CA) N Natalie Park (2Stanford University, Department of Radiology, Palo Alto, United States) C Carol Marquez (Stanford University Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford, CA) K Kimberly Stone (Stanford University Department of Surgery, Stanford, CA) S Susan Crowe (Stanford University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford, CA) F Fauzia Riaz (Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA) M Melinda L. Telli (Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.) K Kathleen C. Horst (Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA)

Abstract

e12537 Background: Pregnancy-associated and postpartum breast cancers (PABC/PPBC) have a worse prognosis than other breast cancers. We hypothesized that patients diagnosed earlier postpartum and those breastfeeding (BF) at diagnosis would have inferior outcomes compared to patients diagnosed later or non-BF patients. Methods: We identified PPBC patients diagnosed at our institution 2 years (2-year PP) or 2-5 years (2-5 year PP) following a live birth. Clinicopathologic details, BF status at diagnosis, mastitis in the 6 months prior to diagnosis, and whether symptoms of PPBC were initially attributed to BF or lactational change by the patient or a provider were ascertained via chart review. Characteristics were compared between groups using chi-square or Kruskall-Wallis tests. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess overall survival (OS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Results: From 2002 to 2024, 60 2-year PP patients and 101 2-5 year PP patients were identified. The 2-5 year PP group was older (median age 39.6 vs 37.4 years, p<.001) and less likely to be BF (7% vs 60%, p<.001) at the time of diagnosis. Patients in the 2-5 year PP group were diagnosed at a lower clinical T-stage (50% vs 20% T1, 36 vs 17% T3-4, p<.001) and N-stage (61% vs 37% N0, 11% vs 29% N2-3, p=.01) compared to the 2-year PP group. There was a trend toward decreased metastasis (3% vs 12%, p=.06) and lower grade (13% vs 5% Grade 1, 55% vs 65% Grade 3, p=.2) at diagnosis for 2-5 year PP vs 2-year PP patients. Estrogen and progesterone receptor positivity and triple negative disease did not differ between groups, but HER2+ disease was more common among 2-year PP patients (36% vs 17%, p=.01). Among 2-year PP patients, BF at diagnosis showed a trend toward increased clinical nodal involvement (71% vs 50%, p=.17), metastasis at diagnosis (17% vs 4%, p=.3), and HER2 positivity (44% vs 22%, p=.13). BF patients were significantly more likely to have a diagnosis of mastitis in the 6 months preceding PPBC diagnosis (31% vs 4%, p=.03) and to have their PPBC symptoms initially attributed to BF or lactational change (58% vs 4%, p<.001). There was no difference in months postpartum at diagnosis between BF and non-BF patients (median 11.8 vs 13.5 months, p=.7). Median follow-up was 54 months. The 2-year PP group had inferior OS (5-year OS 79% [95% CI 67-93] vs 97% [95% CI 93-100], p<.001) and MFS (5-year MFS 74% [95% CI 60-90] vs 93% [95% CI 87-99], p=.003) compared to 2-5 year PP patients. Among the 2-year PP group, there was a trend toward worse OS (5-year OS 74% [95% CI 59-93] vs 86% [95% CI 70-100], p=.08) and significantly worse MFS (5-year MFS 62% [95% CI 45-86] vs 91% [95% CI 75-100], p=.032) for those BF vs not BF at diagnosis. Conclusions: Breast cancer diagnosed in the first two years postpartum has a worse prognosis compared to later PPBC. Breastfeeding at diagnosis is associated with inferior outcomes and may lead to delayed diagnosis due to misattribution of symptoms to lactational change.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (8)

D

Daniella Klebaner

Stanford University Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford, CA

N

Natalie Park

2Stanford University, Department of Radiology, Palo Alto, United States

C

Carol Marquez

Stanford University Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford, CA

K

Kimberly Stone

Stanford University Department of Surgery, Stanford, CA

S

Susan Crowe

Stanford University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford, CA

F

Fauzia Riaz

Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA

M

Melinda L. Telli

Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.

K

Kathleen C. Horst

Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA