Impact of time-of-day administration of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on pathologic complete response in esophageal cancer: A multi-site review over two decades.

J Justin Fang (Sam Houston State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Conroe, TX) E Ethan T. Hanks (UTHealth Houston (The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston), Houston, TX) J Jenny Jing Li (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) M Mariela A. Blum Murphy (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) J Jaffer A. Ajani J Joe Y. Chang Z Zhongxing X. Liao (Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) Q Quynh Nguyen W Wayne L. Hofstetter (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) K Kyle Gregory Mitchell (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) M Mara Antonoff (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) G Garrett L. Walsh (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) D David C. Rice (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) R Reza J. Mehran (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) S Stephen Swisher A Ara A. Vaporciyan Z Zachary Buchwald (Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA) R Ravi Rajaram (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) S Steven H. Lin D David Qian (Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX)

Abstract

346 Background: Recent studies have consistently demonstrated associations between survival and time-of-day administration of oncologic treatments (i.e. immunotherapy and radiotherapy). However, the reported outcomes of OS and PFS are inextricably linked to confounding factors that also influence treatment appointments. We present the first report of surgical pathology as a more objective and unbiased measure of time-of-day related treatment efficacy in the neoadjuvant setting. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of all patients with non-metastatic esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy within a multi-site academic hospital system between 2004 and 2024. Achievement of pathologic complete response (pCR) was correlated with receipt of at least 60% of radiotherapy (RT) fractions after 12:00 using both univariate and multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for clinicopathologic characteristics. Results: This study consisted of 789 patients with post-surgery median follow-up of 43 months (IQR 20–105). Patient characteristics were balanced between those who did and did not undergo at least 60% of RT fractions after 12:00 (Table, P>0.05), except for the use of proton therapy (P=0.001). Receipt of at least 60% of RT fractions after 12:00 was associated with significantly higher rate of pCR (25 vs. 13%, OR 2.10 [95% CI 1.22–3.60], P univar =0.007). This finding remained robust to multivariable adjustment for age, sex, ethnicity/race, smoking status, ECOG performance, tumor location, histology (type, grade, features), cancer stage, RT modality, and concurrent chemotherapy regimen (OR 2.22 [95% CI 1.20–4.08], P multivar =0.011). Patients who received at least 60% of RT fractions after 12:00 also had longer median OS (87 vs. 44 months, HR 0.75 [95% CI 0.58–0.98], P multivar =0.034). Time-of-day administration of chemotherapy infusions was not associated with pCR or OS. Conclusions: In neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer, we found that receipt of more afternoon RT treatments was independently associated with improved outcomes as measured by both surgical pathology and OS. Additional mechanistic and prospective clinical studies of chronotherapy are warranted. Received ≥60% RT fractions after noon,N=622 (%) Received <60% RT fractions after noon,N=127 (%) P-value Median age [IQR] 62 [54–68] 62 [54–67] 0.656 Female 83 (13) 20 (16) 0.317 Never-smoker 176 (27) 26 (20) 0.183 ECOG 0–1 613 (93) 120 (94) 0.572 Adenocarcinoma histology 604 (91) 111 (87) 0.184 Signet ring cell features 99 (15) 26 (20) 0.144 Distal esophageal primary 606 (92) 114 (90) 0.495 Overall stage I–II / III / IVA 69 (10) / 435 (66) / 158 (24) 10 (8) / 81 (64) / 36 (28) 0.456 Received proton therapy 201 (30) 20 (16) 0.001

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 2_suppl
Published January 10, 2026
Pages 346-346
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

J

Justin Fang

Sam Houston State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Conroe, TX

E

Ethan T. Hanks

UTHealth Houston (The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston), Houston, TX

J

Jenny Jing Li

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

M

Mariela A. Blum Murphy

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

J

Jaffer A. Ajani

J

Joe Y. Chang

Z

Zhongxing X. Liao

Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Q

Quynh Nguyen

W

Wayne L. Hofstetter

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

K

Kyle Gregory Mitchell

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

M

Mara Antonoff

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

G

Garrett L. Walsh

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

D

David C. Rice

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

R

Reza J. Mehran

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

S

Stephen Swisher

A

Ara A. Vaporciyan

Z

Zachary Buchwald

Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA

R

Ravi Rajaram

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

S

Steven H. Lin

D

David Qian

Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX