Impact of targeted therapies (TT) and immunotherapy (IO) on outcomes in patients (pts) with anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC): International data from the Spanish GETNE registry.

J Jorge Hernando T Tiago Nunes (Instituto Portugues de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, Lisboa, Portugal) J José Miguel Rodellar (Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain) A Alejandro Garcia-Alvarez A Antia Fernandez (Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Santiago De Compostela, Spain) G German Iglesias Álvarez (Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, ISPA, Oviedo, Spain) I Isaac Ceballos (Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain) M Maria Plana (Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'hospitalet De Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain) C Carlos Gonzalez (Millenium Nucleus in NanoBioPhysics) R Rosa Bella Cueto (Hospital Parc Tauli, Sabadell, Spain) M Maria Luisa Isidro (Hospital Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain) J Javier Martinez-Trufero G Gloria Marquina N Nieves Martinez Lago (Department of Medical Oncology. Hospital Clínico Universitario e Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain) G Guillermo Crespo (Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain) R Raquel Jimeno (Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain) I Isabel Lorenzo-Lorenzo P Pablo Ayala de Miguel (Medical Oncology Department. Hospital Universitario San Pedro de Alcántara, Cáceres, Spain) V Victoria Alcazar (Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa, Madrid, Spain) J Jaume Capdevila

Abstract

e18154 Background: The systemic treatment landscape in ATC is rapidly evolving, with promising therapies such as BRAF-targeted therapy (TT) and immunotherapy (IO). Despite the historically poor prognosis of ATC, certain patient populations achieve prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) with these treatments. While conventional chemotherapy (CT) has limited efficacy, it remains a key component of the treatment sequencing. This study aim is to describe treatment outcomes in a nationwide cohort of ATC patients (pts) in the era of novel systemic therapies. Methods: A retrospective analysis of ATC pts was conducted using the Spanish Registry of Advanced Thyroid Cancer (REGETNE-TIROIDES) across 17 centers in Spain and Portugal. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, molecular profiling, types of systemic treatment, treatment outcomes, and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Results: A total of 214 pts (age 70y, 56.5% female) were included. 8.4% had stage IVA, 34.5% IVB, and 57.1% IVC at diagnosis. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed in 81.8% of pts, identifying frequent alterations, including BRAF (25%), P53 (15.5%), NRAS (14.2%), TERT (12.2%), and PAX8 (10.1%). One ALK-rearrangement and no RET or NTRK were identified. First-line systemic therapy was given to 67.2% of pts: CT (32%), TT (10.4%), and MKI-IO combinations (7.2%). Second-line therapy was given to 46.7%, mostly chemotherapy. Among BRAF-mutant population, TT was used as first-line treatment in 46.2%. The median OS of the cohort was 4.5 months. Multivariate analysis identified NGS access and BRAF mutation as significant prognostic factors. Metastatic pts treated with IO (17.5 vs 2.8 months, p=0.002) or MKI-IO combo (21 vs 4.3 months, p=0.007) had significantly improved survival. However, TT in the BRAF-mutant population showed not significantly impact on OS (10.1 vs 5.7 months). Conclusions: Access to NGS and the use of IO or IO combinations are key factors associated with improved OS in ATC pts. Further clinical trials are needed to explore additional treatment strategies for this challenging population.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

J

Jorge Hernando

T

Tiago Nunes

Instituto Portugues de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, Lisboa, Portugal

J

José Miguel Rodellar

Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain

A

Alejandro Garcia-Alvarez

A

Antia Fernandez

Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Santiago De Compostela, Spain

G

German Iglesias Álvarez

Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, ISPA, Oviedo, Spain

I

Isaac Ceballos

Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain

M

Maria Plana

Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'hospitalet De Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

C

Carlos Gonzalez

Millenium Nucleus in NanoBioPhysics

R

Rosa Bella Cueto

Hospital Parc Tauli, Sabadell, Spain

M

Maria Luisa Isidro

Hospital Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain

J

Javier Martinez-Trufero

G

Gloria Marquina

N

Nieves Martinez Lago

Department of Medical Oncology. Hospital Clínico Universitario e Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain

G

Guillermo Crespo

Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain

R

Raquel Jimeno

Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain

I

Isabel Lorenzo-Lorenzo

P

Pablo Ayala de Miguel

Medical Oncology Department. Hospital Universitario San Pedro de Alcántara, Cáceres, Spain

V

Victoria Alcazar

Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa, Madrid, Spain

J

Jaume Capdevila