Impact of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) on detection of ctDNA in patients with early-stage lung cancer: Interim findings from the prospective SABR-DETECT trial.
Abstract
3044 Background: Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is the preferred curative treatment for inoperable patients with stage I/IIA non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In cases where the tumor is inaccessible or biopsy carries a high risk of complications, SABR is offered even in the absence of a tissue diagnosis, based on a high likelihood of malignancy as calculated by validated predictive models. In these situations, a blood based liquid biopsy detecting circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can serve as an aide to confirm malignancy and allow molecular testing. However, low ctDNA yield in early stage NSCLC presents a challenge for diagnosis. This study hypothesizes that ctDNA detection rates will improve by combining assessment of pre- and post-SABR plasma samples. Methods: This is a multi-institutional study including two cohorts: 1) patients with suspected stage I/IIA NSCLC, with a pretreatment likelihood of malignancy of ≥60% on Herder or Brock models, and 2) patients with biopsy-proven NSCLC. SABR was delivered according to standard guidelines. Plasma was collected for ctDNA analysis before and 24-72 hours following the first fraction of SABR. SHIELDING ULTRA MRD panel of hotspot regions in 2365 cancer-related genes with ultra-high sensitivity was used for ctDNA analysis (mutation + fragment profile + CNV). In this pre-planned interim analysis, we report on the secondary objective: to assess the impact of SABR on detection rates of ctDNA. Results: Paired plasma samples (pre- and post-SABR) were tested for 69 patients. After quality control analysis, 66 paired samples were analyzed and included in this interim analysis. The median age was 76 years (range, 56-89) and 36 (54%) were male. The median concentration of circulating free DNA (ng/mL) did not increase from pre- (5.5, inter quartile range (IQR): 3.3-8.1) to post-SABR (5.7, IQR: 4.1-7.6) (P=0.82). The ctDNA detection rate in pre-SABR samples was 22.7% versus 27.3% in post-SABR samples (Table). Interestingly, in 10 patients (15.2%), ctDNA became detectable in post-SABR samples and in 7 patients (10.6%) the ctDNA was no longer detectable in the post-SABR samples. The ctDNA remained undetectable in 41 patients (62.1%). 37.9% of patients had detectable ctDNA either before or after SABR. Conclusions: The diagnostic yield of ctDNA for confirming malignancy in early stage NSCLC is improved by testing both the pre- and the post-SABR samples, collected within 24-72 hours after the first fraction of SABR. This approach may improve the diagnostic rates of liquid biopsies for patients with presumed NSCLC undergoing SABR, warranting further investigation of ctDNA detection before and shortly after treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT05921474 . ctDNA detection rates (N=66). Pre-SABR Post-SABR n (%) detected detected 8 (12.1%) not detected detected 10 (15.2%) detected not detected 7 (10.6%) not detected not detected 41 (62.1%)
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Saurav Verma
Sympascho Young
Verspeeten Family Cancer Centre, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
Thomas Kennedy
Lockheed Martin Space, Littleton, CO, USA.
Morgan Black
5Western University, Department of Oncology, London, Canada
Britney Messam
Verspeeten Family Cancer Centre, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
Emma Churchman
Verspeeten Family Cancer Centre, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
Joanna Laba
Verspeeten Family Cancer Centre, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
George B Rodrigues
Verspeeten Family Cancer Centre, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
Yee Ung
Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
May Tsao
Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Christopher Goodman
Verspeeten Family Cancer Centre, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
Melody Qu
Verspeeten Family Cancer Centre, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
Pencilla Lang
Brian P. Yaremko
Verspeeten Family Cancer Centre, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
Andrew Warner
Ningyou Li
Geneseeq Research Institute, Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing, China
Ruoying Yu
Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing, China
Alexander V. Louie
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
David A. Palma
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
Daniel Adam Breadner
Verspeeten Family Cancer Centre, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada