Impact of RNA sequencing on diagnosis and therapy: Early results from a tertiary cancer center in India.
Abstract
e23522 Background: RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) can detect gene fusions and expression-linked copy-number events that may be missed or remain ambiguous on standard workup. We evaluated the real-world clinical utility of RNA-seq specifically through fusion and amplification detection, focusing on whether results changed diagnosis and/or altered treatment. Methods: We reviewed consecutive patients undergoing RNA-seq at our center. Utility endpoints were captured prospectively/retrospectively in the dataset as (1) diagnosis change owing to RNA-seq and (2) treatment-course change owing to RNA-seq. For this analysis, RNA-seq “unique yield” was defined as fusion and/or amplification reported. Outcomes were summarized overall and by sarcoma/mesenchymal vs other cancers. Results: Among 26 evaluable patients, RNA-seq identified fusions and/or amplifications in 13/26 (50.0%) (fusions: 12/26 [46.2%]; amplifications: 3/26 [11.5%]). Diagnosis changed owing to RNA-seq in 4/26 (15.4%), and all diagnosis-changing cases were fusion-driven (4/4). Treatment-course change attributable to RNA-seq was documented in 6/25 (24.0%) patients with evaluable treatment-impact data. Fusion/amplification yield was higher in sarcoma/mesenchymal tumors (8/14 [57.1%]) than in other cancers (5/12 [41.7%]). Diagnosis change owing to RNA-seq occurred in 3/14 (21.4%) sarcoma/mesenchymal cases and 1/12 (8.3%) other cancers; treatment change owing to RNA-seq was observed in 3/13 (23.1%) vs 3/12 (25.0%), respectively. Conclusions: In this real-world cohort, RNA-seq demonstrated meaningful clinical utility primarily through fusion/amplification detection, with 15.4% diagnosis changes and 24.0% treatment changes attributable to RNA-seq. Impact was enriched in fusion/amplification-positive cases, supporting RNA-seq as a high-value adjunct test—particularly in diagnostically challenging sarcoma/mesenchymal tumors and selected carcinomas. Diagnosis change owing to RNA-seq (fusion-driven). Case Pre-RNA working diagnosis Histopathology Key RNA-seq finding (fusion/amp) Post-RNA integrated diagnosis / implication (as recorded) 1 Metastatic adenocarcinoma, CUP Adenocarcinoma FGFR–FILIP1 fusion Likely cholangiocarcinoma (site-of-origin reclassification) 2 Atypical teratoid / rhabdoid tumor ATRT, metastatic SS18–SSX2 fusion (t(18;X)) Fusion-consistent synovial sarcoma biology → diagnostic reclassification 3 Spindle cell tumor (low malignant potential; SMC differentiation) Spindle cell tumor (low malignant potential; SMC differentiation) LRRFIP1–ALK fusion ALK-rearranged IMT biology confirmed → diagnostic refinement/reclassification 4 Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) Spindle cell tumor (intermediate malignant potential; myogenic differentiation) RRBP1–USP6 fusion Nodular fasciitis (benign) → diagnosis changed to benign entity
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (12)
Ankita Singh
Prashant Mehta
8Amrita Hospital, Faridabad, Faridabad, India
Moushumi Suryavanshi
Amrita School of Medicine, Amrita Vishwavidyapeetham, Faridabad, India
Vidit Kapoor
Amrita School of Medicine, Amrita Vishwavidyapeetham, Faridabad, India
Saphalta Baghmar
Amrita School of Medicine, Amrita Vishwavidyapeetham, Faridabad, India
Gaurav Khanna
University of California, San Diego ,
Arupparna Sengupta
Amrita School of Medicine, Amrita Vishwavidyapeetham, Faridabad, India
Pravas Chandra Mishra
Amrita School of Medicine, Amrita Vishwavidyapeetham, Faridabad, India
Swati Pabbi
Amrita School of Medicine, Amrita Vishwavidyapeetham, Faridabad, India
Rahul Kumar
Anshul Jain
Amrita School of Medicine, Amrita Vishwavidyapeetham, Faridabad, India
Jagsahib Kaur
Amrita School of Medicine, Amrita Vishwavidyapeetham, Faridabad, India