Impact of regorafenib treatment on overall survival (OS) in advanced sarcoma patients.
Abstract
11556 Background: Regorafenib has been evaluated in several sarcoma clinical trials and the common primary endpoint of these studies was Progression-Free Survival (PFS) according to RECIST, with OS as secondary endpoint. We aimed to assess the impact of regorafenib on OS using pooled analysis of REGOSARC (NCT01900743, five cohorts: liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, other soft tissue sarcoma and non-adipocytic sarcoma post-pazopanib) and (NCT02389244, four cohorts: osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, chondrosarcoma and chordoma). Both trials were placebo-controlled trials with potential switch to regorafenib in placebo-arm at progression. Methods: The primary endpoint was OS in months (mo.) from randomisation estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. The Hazard Ratio (HR) of death in a Cox model was stratified by histological . We used 2 methods for controlling regorafenib switch on OS: Rank-Preserving Structural Failure Time Model (RPSFTM; White et al. 1997) and Modified Iterative Parametric Estimation (MIPE: Zhang et al. 2016), with bootstrap-based 95%CI for both methods. Two populations were considered: in the primary analysis included all patients in both trials (n=355), and in secondary analysis excluded chordoma and liposarcoma patients (n=289), since regorafenib failed to demonstrate activity in these subtypes. Results: In primary analysis, the median age was 56.0 years (range, 16.0; 85.0); 325 patients (91.5%) had metastatic disease. 218 (61.4%) patients had soft tissue sarcoma and 137 (38.6%) patients had bone sarcoma. Median follow-up was 70.9 mo (IQR: 54.0-87.5). The median OS was 9.5 mo. (95%CI, 7.7-12.4) in Placebo arm versus 12.8 mo. (95%CI, 11.0-15.8) in regorafenib arm (HR: 0.85 (95%CI, 0.67-1.06); p=0.148). When correcting regorafenib switch effect, the estimated HR was 0.59 (0.31-1.25) and 0.62 (0.27-1.46) using RPSFTM and MIPE methods, respectively. Conclusions: In this pooled analysis, we observe a marked difference in OS, but which does not reach the , even after exclusion of chordomas and liposarcomas patients (20%-risk reduction, with p=0.083). After controlling for the switch effect, the corrected effect of regorafenib increased dramatically from 20% risk-reduction of death to a 45%-50% reduction in the population excluding chordomas and liposarcomas.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (12)
Clemence Leguillette
Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
C. Schiffler
Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
Jennifer Wallet
CH Valenciennes, Valenciennes, France
Sylvie Chabaud
Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
Jean-Yves Blay
Loic Lebellec
Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
Maud Toulmonde
Benjamin Verret
Gustave Roussy and Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
Marta Jimenez
Precision Medicine Group, Unicancer, IHU-National PRecISion Medicine Center in Oncology, Paris, France
Marie Vanseymortier
Oscar Lambret Comprehensive Cancer Center, Lille, France
Marie-Cécile Le Deley
Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
Nicolas Penel
Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France