Impact of prior treatment setting on the efficacy of rucaparib vs physician’s choice in <i>BRCA</i> -mutated castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in TRITON3.
Abstract
5054 Background: Rucaparib significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) versus physician’s choice of docetaxel or an androgen-receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) (abiraterone or enzalutamide) in men with BRCA mutations who were chemotherapy-naïve in the mCRPC setting and had received one prior ARPI in the phase 3 TRITON3 trial (NCT02975934). This post-hoc analysis evaluated whether the timing of prior ARPI therapy impacted the efficacy of rucaparib. Methods: Patients were randomized 2:1 to rucaparib (600 mg BID) or physician’s choice of docetaxel or ARPI, after progression on 1 prior second-generation ARPI in any setting. The primary endpoint was rPFS. Outcomes were analyzed according to whether patients received the prior ARPI in the metastatic castration sensitive (mCSPC) or castration resistant (mCRPC) setting. Data cutoff was August 25, 2022. Results: Of the 302 BRCA1/2 patients, 68 received prior ARPI in the mCSPC setting (42 rucaparib; 26 physician’s choice) and 234 in the mCRPC setting (159 rucaparib; 75 physician’s choice). Baseline characteristics were generally similar. Prior treatments in the mCSPC and mCRPC groups, respectively, included abiraterone (73.5% vs 53.0%), enzalutamide (29.4% vs 48.3%), and docetaxel (17.6% vs 24.8%). Median rPFS favored rucaparib over physician’s choice in both groups (mCSPC: 13.6 vs 8.2 months; HR 0.60 [95% CI, 0.32–1.15]; mCRPC: 11.2 vs 5.8 months; HR 0.43 [95% CI, 0.30–0.61]). Median OS was similar between treatments in both settings (mCSPC: 23.2 vs 21.7 months; HR 0.81 [95% CI, 0.47–1.41]; mCRPC: 23.2 vs 21.0 months; HR 0.91 [95% CI, 0.66–1.25]). Treatment-related adverse events occurred at comparable rates (89.6% vs 86.1%). Conclusions: Rucaparib demonstrated efficacy in patients with BRCA-mutated mCRPC, regardless of whether prior ARPI was administered in the mCSPC or mCRPC setting. Clinical trial information: NCT02975934 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (18)
Srikala S. Sridhar
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto
Karim Olivier Fizazi
Centre Oscar Lambret, University of Paris-Saclay, Lille, France
Alan Haruo Bryce
Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
Simon Chowdhury
Charles J. Ryan
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Teresa Alonso-Gordoa
Jose Angel Arranz
Gregorio Marañón University General Hospital, Madrid, Spain
Alison Jane Birtle
University of Manchester, Manchester, University of Lancashire and Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, United Kingdom
Ian Byard
ICON Cancer Centre, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Francesco Carrozza
Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Ospedale Santa Maria delle Croci, AUSL Romagna, Ravenna, Italy
Ugo De Giorgi
Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy
Ignacio Duran
Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
Jean-Charles Goeminne
CHU-UCL-Namur site Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium
Evan R. Goldfischer
Premier Medical Group of the Hudson Valley, Poughkeepsie, NY
Marc-Oliver Grimm
Darrin Despain
Pharma&, New York, NY
Marcia Craib
Pharma&, New York, NY
Henriette Lindberg
Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark